Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


VOTING RIGHTS ACT: Heller offers English-only bill

Plan would repeal federal requirement that cities, counties provide bilingual ballots




WASHINGTON -- Rep. Dean Heller dusted off a hot-button issue Tuesday, introducing a bill that would require voter ballots to be in English only.

Heller's bill would repeal Voting Rights Act provisions that require cities and counties to provide bilingual ballots when 5 percent of voting-age citizens are deemed by the U.S. census to be limited in English.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say




  • Heller, a Reno Republican who is seeking re-election, was secretary of state before entering Congress in 2007. He said the most frequent complaint he heard in Carson City involved Spanish-language ballots in Clark and Washoe counties.

    "There was not anything I could do about it because it was a federal issue," Heller said. "Now that I am in a federal position, I can."

    Heller said bilingual ballots are an unfunded mandate in the 36 states that are required to supply them. He said the ballots are contrary to the goal of getting immigrants to assimilate.

    "If you are going to be successful in this country you have to learn the language," Heller said. "Too many times the federal government encourages people not to learn the language."

    The voting rights requirement also takes effect when more than 10,000 potential voters in a county or city are English-limited.

    Voting rights rules also cover language ballots for American Indians and native Alaskans. Heller said he created exceptions for those groups because "they were here first."

    Elko, Nye and White Pine counties have printed ballots in Shoshone. Ballots in the Paiute language have been provided in Lyon County, and another native language is represented in Humboldt County, said Rob Toonkel, communications director for U.S. English, a group that promotes English as the official language.

    Congress debates the issue periodically, usually as part of its reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act. The bilingual ballot requirement was added to the law in 1975.

    Most recently, the House in 2006 defeated an English-only ballot amendment. At that time, Rep. Jon Porter and then-Rep. Jim Gibbons, both Republicans, voted for an English-only ballot while Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., voted against it.

    Toonkel said ballot language bills are a tough sell because opponents frame them as anti-voter rights.

    Wade Henderson, president of the Leadership Council on Civil Rights, said the Heller bill was mean-spirited and was introduced against a backdrop of anti-immigrant fervor.

    "Guaranteeing access to a ballot is a constitutional right," Henderson said. "I am pretty confident that Representative Heller's bill will gain virtually no traction."

    The bill "would disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens who are not fully fluent in English," said Brent Wilkes, national executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens.

    Wilkes said the bill is based on a faulty premise that immigrants do not want to learn English. If anything, he said, newcomers are becoming fluent in English a generation faster than they were before because of mass media exposure.

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 22 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Ken wrote on May 09, 2008 10:23 AM: Let's call this what it is. It is an attempt to bring up a small piece of a larger "wedge" issue for political purposes. Rep. Heller was selected because this sort of legislation will play well in his district.

    The immigration debate in this country hasn't changed in 200 years. It is easy to blame our economic woes on those that take the lowest paying jobs. How are the English skills of today's immigrants any different than walking through any of the "ethnic" neighborhoods of big cities back in the 1920s and 1930s? It's not.

    There are more important issues than what langugages are placed on ballots facing this country. This is merely a political ploy to keep debate alive in an election year.


    Report abuse

    Michael Ray Thompson wrote on May 07, 2008 08:26 PM: I'm a conservative Republican. I don't understand the fuss caused by the bilingual ballot. People need to understand what they are voting for. We have aids for illiterate people, for blind people. Why not have ballots in foreign languages as well?


    Report abuse

    UNLVStud wrote on May 07, 2008 06:46 PM: My grandparents immigrated here and learned English as well. My point is that even though they learned English, it didn't follow that they understood or grasped in the same way complex issues such as ballot initiatives with legally complicated language. Obviously those issues translated into their native language would've helped them. That's the point where I loose support for Heller's change in the law.

    I agree that all US citizens should learn and be proficient in English.

    For the record, even if the current law was in place when my grandparents came over to the States, it wouldn't help them as they didn't speak Spanish or live in an area where 10,000 spoke their language.

    Based on most of the comments, Heller's exceptions for Native Americans should not be supported either. Seems like a pure English-only or the current law are the only two options.

    Why give an exception to Native Americans and not to other groups?

    If it's just the, "They were here first" argument Heller states as his reason for the exceptions, then it should follow that in Nevada an additional exception should be made. Spanish speaking individuals were here first. Therefore an exception should be made for them as well. Thus we come full circle to the current state of the law.


    Report abuse

    Joe C wrote on May 07, 2008 06:40 PM: To Ron,
    I have to disagree with you our best and brightest educated elite, educators, congress, church leaders and our so called business leaders have supported the illegal invasion to exploit; after it became harder to exploit black Americans.

    The idea is to get people off government assistance and illegal immigration has reversed that with lower wages and displaced citizens.

    Our best and brightest and so-called tolerant humanitarians have been fine with subjugated labor.
    We need to open opportunity not stifle wages.
    We face a complexities of agendas including mexico’s harmful agenda.


    Report abuse

    ron wrote on May 07, 2008 05:42 PM: Hooray for Heller! In addition, voting privledges should be granted only to those who contribute as much or more) in taxes as they take through social programs. Voters should also need to pass an IQ test with a score of approximately 80. Why would we not want our best and brightest choosing our leaders? We shouldn't give people on permanent government assistance the opportunity to elect leaders who will continue those policies. The so-called "Voting Rights Act" is terrible legislation. To 'UNLV Stud': the effort to learn English must come from the individuals who need it, not from the taxpayers. My grandparents immigrated here and learned basic English on their own. Let's return to the concept of individual responsibility! Liberal Democrats are destroying this country.


    Report abuse

    Joe C wrote on May 07, 2008 04:56 PM: You mean a government representative actually wants to follow the will of the American people and expect immigrants to assimilate.
    What next actually enforce immigration laws and put criminal employers in jail, secure or borders, and stop aid to illegal aliens.

    Never happen, do you know why?
    It makes common sense and the majority of Americans want that done.
    It’s just a dream… Government bought and paid for and a racist illegal invasion doesn’t matter to them.


    Report abuse

    Alan wrote on May 07, 2008 03:50 PM: Everyone talks about the USA and there laws on immigration. You must have a passport to enter Mexico and all the other countries, you are not allowed to own land in Mexico, or receive assistance unless you can prove Mexican citizenship. when arrested you are not allowed a free phone call to the USA. Immigration from south America or USA is dealt with the Mexican outlaw government and jailed until sent back to their country. Close the f borders and ask for proof of Citizenship and if not seeya. Again DEMONCRATS say no.


    Report abuse

    urnuts wrote on May 07, 2008 03:24 PM: I'm tired of us catering to the immigrants that refuse to learn the language. This is America - learn english. If you don't want to learn the language, go back to your backward nation. Spending millions because Pedro or Maria can not speak. If we are going to be fair, we might as well have the languages of all nationalities on the ballots. It would look like the phone book. AMERICA FIRST.


    Report abuse

    Me wrote on May 07, 2008 01:25 PM: Three cheers for Heller....
    Hip Hip Hooray...
    Hip Hip Hooray...
    Hip Hip Hooray...


    Report abuse

    Marge wrote on May 07, 2008 01:21 PM: If you can't speak it learn it like my great grandparents, grandparents and parents did. I'm sick of looking around and seeing signs in Spanish. This is America. How about reverse discrimination now. I need to speak Spanish to get a job in my own country. The next time these illegals have their rallys, bring in the National Guard, load them up and drop them back in Mexico where they belong. Let's have a massive tactic against these illegals. I can say I hate what this country has become.


    Read All Comments