Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Casinos, teachers discuss tax plan

Negotiations aimed at finding alternative to raising gaming tax

The state teachers union is in talks with gaming companies about a possible agreement to call off an initiative petition that would raise gaming taxes.

Under the proposed deal being discussed, the tax on hotel rooms would be increased instead, and the new revenue collected put toward schools.


Most Popular Stories
  • Planet Hollywood fined for Prive nightclub's actions
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Doctor recalls trip to Jackson's suite
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • A bad night at the Minxx during NBA weekend
  • SENATOR'S AFFAIR: Hamptons given $96,000 in gifts
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • SENATOR'S AFFAIR: Ensign wounds keep festering




  • The ballot initiative being circulated by the Nevada State Education Association would increase taxes on gross gaming receipts and put the money toward education needs.

    Dan Hart, a spokesman for the teachers union, confirmed the negotiations Wednesday but declined to go into specifics, saying the details are tentative and subject to change.

    "There are discussions about alternatives to raising the gaming tax going on between prominent members of the gaming community and representatives of the teachers union," he said. "There is a real possibility that something might be worked out here. The preliminary stages have been encouraging."

    The talks are between union and gaming officials; lawmakers would have to pass any such measure by a two-thirds margin in both the state Senate and Assembly because it involves increasing taxes.

    Gov. Jim Gibbons, who has pledged not to raise taxes, would veto the plan, said his spokesman, Ben Kieckhefer.

    "This is a tax levied directly on the people, not an industry fee," he said. "With that in mind, the governor would oppose raising taxes on the people of Nevada."

    He noted, however, that a two-thirds vote of both houses is also what it takes to override a gubernatorial veto.

    "If the Legislature is able to find two-thirds support in both chambers to approve it, they could also try to override the governor's veto with the same two-thirds," Kieckhefer said. "If the veto gets overridden, that shows broad support on the part of the Legislature, which was the intent (of the two-thirds requirement to raise taxes) in the first place."

    Sources speaking on condition of anonymity said casino executives approached the union looking to make a deal to head off the petition, which the union says is ahead of schedule to gather the needed signatures and which both sides expect would have a good shot at passage by voters.

    Wynn Resorts Chairman Steve Wynn is the driving force behind the talks, sources said. Wynn didn't return calls seeking comment Wednesday.

    The petition would raise the highest tax rate on gaming receipts by 3 percentage points, from 6.75 percent to 9.75 percent.

    The proposed deal, on the other hand, would raise the tax on hotel rooms by 2 percentage points but leave gaming receipts alone, sources said, giving teachers an ample amount of new revenue but not cutting into the companies' profits, since the tax is paid directly by visitors.

    Sources said some existing room tax money, which is currently divided among roads, schools, and the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, also could be diverted to education under the plan.

    The gaming companies declined to talk about the proposal on Wednesday. A Station Casinos representative was unavailable for comment, while a Boyd Gaming spokesman declined to comment on the issue.

    Harrah's Senior Vice President Jan Jones would say only, "I've always believed communication is essential to positive outcomes."

    MGM Mirage spokesman Alan Feldman professed no knowledge of the matter. "As we have seen no details, no plan and no specifics, it is kind of hard to comment," he said. "We still stand opposed to the union's initiative."

    Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, also said she would need to see the details to know whether she would support proposed legislation. She said she did not support the ballot question.

    "I think raising taxes through the initiative process is a bad idea," she said. "In general, I don't support that. That's why the Legislature exists. Sometimes it's frustrating, but it's a better process."

    Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, also said Wednesday that he was not familiar with the terms of the potential deal.

    To put the initiative before voters statewide in November, teachers must collect 58,628 valid signatures by May 20. A legal challenge to the petition brought by the Nevada Resort Association is pending appeal to the state Supreme Court.

    The initiative would amend the Nevada Constitution. It would have to pass twice, in 2008 and 2010, to take effect.

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball @reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919. Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz @reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3871.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 36 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    cas127 wrote on May 10, 2008 02:16 PM: Casinos and public sector unions getting in bed together?

    Here come the state income tax proposals!


    seslew wrote on May 08, 2008 10:20 PM: How about this for an idea to get casino owners to pay more taxes while at the same time showing how much Nevadan's support and appreciate everything they have done to drive our economy.

    Every dollar of profit that is reinvested or held in Nevada will be taxed at the incredibly low rate of 6.75% showing our appreciation for all they do BUT every dollar of profit invested outside Nevada will be taxed 39%. Sometimes those out of state investments would be lucrative enough
    that it would make sense to pay the tax. Our state would grow and collect more taxes.

    I like and respect Steve Wynn but last time I checked he just had one vote like everybody else. And next time the teachers union askes me to sign a petition for anything if it doesn't list the real goal of the petition and where all the sell out points are I am telling them ask S. Wynn to sign it 160,000 times. I didn't support some other initiatives because I thought this one was best. Is it really OK in their mind to bargain away the position of every last person who signed the petition without any consultation or consensus from the people backing it? Who honsetly thinks that if the union makes a deal with Wynn that the best interests of ALL Nevadan's will be represented? One thing is for sure, the interest's of Wynn and and the Officers of the Teachers Union will be of the greatest importance in any agreement. I wonder what their priorities are.


    joe wrote on May 08, 2008 09:02 PM: ths,

    You may work as a conventioneer, but you have no idea about the financial inner workings of a major casino. True, many of the rooms are filled with folks visiting for the conventions, but the majority of these rooms are paid for by the companies they represent. And you are wrong about the convention folks spending way more than the average visitor. Convention people rarely spend much money outside the convention when visiting Vegas. Usually the full-day busy schedule of the conventions take alot of their time to where they're only time to spend money is usually on food (mostly buffets). Talk to any casino floor personnel (dealers, servers, cashiers, hosts, pit bosses, porters, front desk, ect.) and they'll tell you how they dread the large conventions because they know they'll usually get stiffed on tips or have patrons who play only $20 on a table then leave. The main industry that seems to have an increase during large conventions are the gentlemen's clubs.

    NY and NJ have much more diverse economys than Las Vegas does, this explains their better schools and infrastructures. Casino revenues there make up only a small portion of the economy unlike here. When you're the overwhelmingly dominant industry in an area you are naturally going to be asked to give more to support the economy you create. Also, NY and NJ have not experienced the massive high speed growth Vegas has. They have much more mature economies, which gain revenue from multiple sectors.

    Yes, ths, I have lived in NJ and worked in the casino industry there. I helped a smaller casino emerge from bankruptcy. Vegas and NJ economies are as similar as apples and oranges.

    Oh yea, your tax dollars do not pay for another person's unemployment, people pay for their own unemployment. You're thinking of welfare.


    another teacher wrote on May 08, 2008 08:12 PM: So Jon, is it such a bad thing if a chunk of that money DOES go to the teachers? It is unbelievable to me how many people out there think it is acceptable for our teachers to make a salary that puts them at the poverty level. As a teacher, I am a qualified professional with a degree, and make less than many who don't. I love my job, and there is nothing else I would rather be doing, but is it so horrible to try to get our salary equivalent to the cost of living these days?? On top of that, do you know how much money teachers spend each year on their classrooms and students? Let me see you put that much money BACK into your job after making such little money. If we continue to pay our teachers so poorly we are going to lose all of those great veterans that are experts at their craft. Who will replace them? Think about it...highly qualilfied people are eventually going to stop settling for such small means.


    PublicTeacher wrote on May 08, 2008 07:55 PM: Ok, so let me see if I understand this correctly. We wanted to convince tons of people to sign a petition that would specify concrete tax revenues for education, and now we want to go back on that and risk uncertainty again in the funding mechanism? I spent a lot of time talking this petition up, and listing all the reasons it was necessary and good. Now I look like a fool. What is wrong with this picture? Either our funding source needs fixing or it doesn't. We can't have it both ways!


    DennisD wrote on May 08, 2008 07:07 PM: By all means leave those gaming receipts alone - gotta build more casinos in Macau and any place else on the globe they can. Keep on outsourcing the country.

    Buckley's comment says it all. Leave these issues to the bought and paid for legislature, the common people, who the hell are they to make decisions.


    Steve wrote on May 08, 2008 06:58 PM: Now that is the Las Vegas I have come to know and love. The gaming companies talked their way out of paying anything and put the WHOLE burden on the taxpayer by raising the room taxes. Am I the only one who thinks this is the typical sleezy day to day business practices continued by our gaming industry? And the state education department thinks this is acceptable?


    Anthony wrote on May 08, 2008 05:56 PM: Didn't CES just threaten to leave Las Vegas in 2011 when their contract is up because they feel they're being gouged by the Casinos?


    ths wrote on May 08, 2008 04:41 PM: Joe, then you know that a good majority of rooms are filled with convention visitors who spends tons more then the average middle class visitor.

    This is the industry I work in and between unions, hotel rates and other costs we are chasing the conventions out of town or start considering other venues.

    Joe, you ever live in NJ where they have one of the best education systems in the country, or NY?

    There is gaming in both states(one indian reservation that pays the state) with higher gaming tax, sales tax equal to ours or greater, 2.5% property tax and income tax. They have great roads, top education and good public health and safety services. Also a desirable place to live for these reasons.

    Perhaps we are blind thinking we can live at the low tax structure and keep pushing it onto one industry. Sounds like Joe has an issue with the industry he has worked in but every publicly traded company across the country works the same way.


    Daniel wrote on May 08, 2008 03:54 PM: Yep, Joe hit it right on the head. All corporations project a percentage of pay back to the stock holder. This must be met or the stocks go down but not the patrons. This hole fiascal will come to end, and judgement day will handle all this for all the GREEDY.


    Read All Comments