Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Monday
Mar 15, 2010
Clear
Clear 50° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News


Court upholds dress codes

County schools do not violate students' rights

A federal appeals court ruled Monday that Clark County's school dress codes do not violate students' right to free speech after considering a case involving a junior suspended for wearing T-shirts expressing her religious faith.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the case in 2004 on behalf of Kimberly Jacobs, a Liberty High School student suspended five times for a total of 25 days for wearing shirts that violated the school's uniform policy.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Off-duty Las Vegas officer shoots armed suspect in Henderson home invasion
  2. Man arrested, pair shot in car incident
  3. Hepatitis C fight consumes patients
  4. 'Dice' miffed over 'Donny Clay' show
  5. UNLV budget axe could cut entire programs
  6. San Diego State defeats Rebels 55-45 for title; UNLV waits for NCAA bid
  7. Rebels will battle Northern Iowa on Thursday in Oklahoma City in first round
  8. Las Vegas courthouse, Pentagon guns traced to Memphis police
  9. Woman arrested in fatal stabbing
  10. Lawsuits dog GOP candidate




The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with U.S. District Judge Roger Hunt, who ruled in 2005 that uniform requirements do not infringe on students' rights. The panel supported the Clark County School District's policy it created to promote safety and create a positive school environment.

Allen Lichtenstein, an attorney representing the ACLU, disagrees.

"We believe that was an error, and we will do a petition for rehearing," he said.

Kimberly Jacobs, who wore shirts promoting the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, could not be reached for comment Monday.

Lichtenstein referred to a 1960s case called Tinker v. Des Moines. A brother and sister wore armbands to school to protest the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War. The students were suspended after their school passed a new policy banning armbands.

The Supreme Court ruled that students have a right to symbolic speech as long as it doesn't disrupt the school or infringe on other students' rights.

"The court said students don't lose their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse door," Lichtenstein said. "This decision (of the Appeals Court) suggests otherwise."

The Appeals panel voted 2-1 in favor of the School District.

Circuit Judges Michael Daly Hawkins and Richard Clifton ruled that the district's policy fulfills the goal of focusing students' attention and reducing confrontations.

Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas stated in a dissenting opinion, "There is no dispute that Kim Jacobs' wearing of a T-shirt that contained pre-printed expressions of her religious faith would not impinge on the rights of other students. Nor is there any suggestion that her T-shirt could possibly have resulted in a substantial disruption or material interference with school activities."

"We are very pleased with the ruling," said Bill Hoffman, a School District attorney. "We're pleased that the court held that the board's regulations are constitutional and do not violate the students' right to free speech, the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom of expression."

Hoffman said the dress codes have reduced the number of conflicts on campus, although he could not provide detailed statistics.

"I can say with complete certainty that many administrators believe safety has improved and the climate has improved," Hoffman said.

Contact reporter Adrienne Packer at apacker@reviewjournal.com or 702-384-8710.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 28 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Raymond Takashi Swenson wrote on June 24, 2008 11:08 AM: The Supreme Court ruled that black armbands worn to protest the Vietnam War were protected free speech that did not disrupt school, even though the war was a divisive issue that people at the time vehemently argued about and sometime fought over. What is so controversial or disruptive about the LDS faith, which founded the community of Las Vegas and which has many adherents there? The only disruption manifested was the overreaction by the schools, which were NOT motivated by any real concern about disruption, but rather by the fear that the school would be sued (here is the ironic part) by the ACLU for creating an "establishment of religion" if it tolerated religious expression by students. That is also a misunderstanding of the First Amendment. If nothing else, the school is not doing its job of correctly teaching students their rights under the Constitution, including the fact that religious expression has just as much protection under the First Amendment as any other kind of speech, including political speech. Are they seriously banning campaign buttons and T-Shirts that say "I (heart) Obama"? If not, they are discriminating against religious expression. This would not be the first time that the 9th Circuit has screwed up; it is the most reversed Court of Appeals in America. Remember, these are also the judges who said that "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional!


Report abuse

DC wrote on May 14, 2008 09:10 AM: And just where do these people attend a campus? I feel our rights as Christians are violated on a daily basis through teaching of "Darwin's Theory" and not of a higher power of creation, the clothes teenagers are permitted to wear (skulls, sayings, crossbones) along with the teaching habits that have come about. Society has ruined our educational system by all of these "offended" people and the unpolitically correct comments made by a bunch of idiots looking for publicity. Our children are in school to learn...it is not a popularity contest nor a social gathering...but for their education to get them through life. I can only speak for myself and my family, but why don't we allow our kids to get the proper education they are entitled to and leave the politics to the politicians where they belong?


Report abuse

Deidre wrote on May 13, 2008 04:43 PM: I'm okay with the idea of public nudity, until I look around at all of the people around me. How many of them would I like to actually see nude? Not many.


Report abuse

Al Katraz wrote on May 13, 2008 03:46 PM: Life would be so much easier on so many levels if we would all just accept public nudity.


Report abuse

Free Nevada wrote on May 13, 2008 01:42 PM: If you don't want school uniforms, e-mail the district to tell them if you usually vote and, if so, why you are not voting for their upcoming bond measure. Try to keep it under four sentences and don't use profanity.

formerSLC, you're son's T-shirt is funny, but it also probably caused a disruption. It's the disruption, not the T-shirt that is inappropriate.

Ever notice how you behave differently when in a large group of your peers (such as a high school pep rally) than in a smaller group of people? When you talk about people in any one ethnic religion congregating together in a region, you get the same effect, only on an EXTREME level. Just as it doesn't matter what high school, it doesn't matter what religion or region, Salt Lake City, Dearborn, Hoboken, Boston or even South-Central LA. But when those same exact people graduate high school or are dispersed out into a diverse region like California, they are much more passive and tolerant. Unfortunately, the older people get, the less likely they would want to be "diversified" and in fact, someone would probably get hurt if you tried to force it upon them. So it's best to just avoid non-diverse areas and strangle them on a macro-economic scale until all of their young people have left and nature runs its course. In the mean time, it's horrible to see how those regional concentrations are so aggressive towards the millions of young Californian who move there looking for a good life. In the two main ethnically concentrated areas of Southern Nevada, I see the aggression of those "groups" actually breed contempt in the hearts of decent people who otherwise grew up in California's great racial/religious melting pot from 1960s-1990s.


Report abuse

HUH???? wrote on May 13, 2008 01:21 PM: By ACLU standards, that means a kid wearing a t-shirt with BLOODS or CRIPS Stamped accross it should be legal too????? IDIOTS


Report abuse

Kamel Tow wrote on May 13, 2008 01:05 PM: chad and John O'Neill-

Your posts mad me laugh- thank you both! Your fears or phobias of the human form are amusing! Pubic air is visible!?! I had to cackle, but then I thought about pubic air for a second. If I could see pubic air I would be offended, too!

Thanks for the laughs, fellas. The shuttle bus back to the nursing home is waiting on you.


Report abuse

Joel Parker wrote on May 13, 2008 12:44 PM: The simple solution: School uniforms from 1 - 12th grades.


Report abuse

formerSLC wrote on May 13, 2008 10:46 AM: My son was suspended from a Utah high school for wearing a T-shirt that said "Club Mormon - 10% and you're in". Everyone in Utah thought I was an idiot when I complained his rights were violated, the principal laughed at me (of course he was a mormon) - I guess I should have taken it to court but I didn't want to cause my son any more discomfort in Morman Land than he already had to deal with, since he was not LDS.


Report abuse

Vegasrails wrote on May 13, 2008 10:31 AM: For those who have not witnessed what the current High School Student is wearing to school take a look, skulls, cross bones, different sayings that blend into the T-shirt or blouse, some satanic in nature and these items are acceptable. Then the district spend time and money in suspending a student because she wore a religious T-shirt, and then defending their actions all the way up one of the highest courts. This is why no more funds for schools should be granted until the district is held accountable for their actions both in instruction, enforcing their so call rules and spending in general. Due to their actions a student lost time learning. Taxpayers lost money on both at the school and district level. The district should learn to pick their battles better, this was one they should of left alone.


Read All Comments