Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News
May. 15, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

JANE ANN MORRISON: State high court race makes up for lack of drama with importance

JANE ANN MORRISON
MORE COLUMNS

Regionalism, party affiliation, gender, money and qualifications will determine who replaces Justice Bill Maupin on the Nevada Supreme Court. I can't say yet which factors will dominate in this oh-so-interesting and important race, but the statewide, nonpartisan race will be won via strategic twists and turns.

Maupin's decision to retire startled a lot of people who expected he would cruise to re-election no matter who filed against him. But when he pulled out, four contenders jumped in. Three are well-qualified women. One is already a judge. The lone male is a former judge with the best name recognition, who lost credibility when he vouched for District Judge Elizabeth Halverson.

Each of the four contenders has strengths:

• Washoe County Family Judge Deborah Schumacher.

Most Popular Stories
  • SEX IN LIBRARY! SAY IT AIN'T SO
  • NORM: Dara Torres' ex still seems bitter
  • NORM: Curtain falls on flying body parts
  • NORM: Health put little damper on Carlin
  • EXCOMMUNICATION: Mormons expel LV man
  • SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES: As rates rise, exec pay soars
  • Officer in deadly crash held; tests reveal marijuana in blood
  • TAKEN FOR A BUS RIDE
  • NORM: Governor chums with club cronies
  • POLICE INVESTIGATION: Two men shot in the head



    • • Las Vegas attorney Nancy Allf.

    • Las Vegas attorney Kris Pickering.

    • Ex-Judge Don Chairez.

    The first hurdle is emerging from the September primary as one of the two candidates on the November ballot. Each has a plan.

    Schumacher, a Democrat, is the only sitting judge and only Northern Nevadan. The northern and rural voters tend to stick with a northern candidate.

    Pickering grew up in Reno, and practiced law there for 10 years. Plus, she and her husband, Las Vegas attorney Steve Morris, own a ranch near Belmont and have ties to rural Nevada. An additional plus, at least outside of Clark County, she's a Republican. And all things being equal, the rural counties lean Republican. Her northern roots and Republicanism count for something. But she also points to her range of experience.

    "On the merits, I'm the best qualified," she said, citing her scholarship and appellate experience and her work in state and federal courts.

    Allf, a Democrat, has solid support among Nevada Democrats and is president of the Nevada State Bar. Her secret weapon is her husband, political strategist David Thomas, who will give her race his best effort.

    "No one can outwork me," Allf declared. "People know who I am and know my character and integrity."

    All three women are in their 50s and while each will argue their particular experience is "the best," each is clearly qualified, articulate and has passion for the law.

    Now will being the only man help Chairez? Possibly, but he's burdened with one albatross. He told Republicans that Halverson was a great candidate, smart and qualified. His support helped her win the endorsement of the Review-Journal. Now he has a "greatly diminished chance" of again winning the Review-Journal's endorsement, Publisher Sherman Frederick said.

    But Chairez has name recognition from his time as a judge and because of his failed bids for Congress, the Nevada Supreme Court and attorney general. If he makes it out of the primary based on his name recognition, whichever woman is his opponent is expected to get lots of money because, while a pleasant person, he's not highly regarded in the legal community.

    It might be a race won by television ads, because Supreme Court races seldom get a lot of news media coverage unless something akin to mud-wrestling by the candidates occurs, which has happened in the past.

    Schumacher believes voters want someone with judicial experience for the state's top judicial post. Historically, the last nonjudge to make it to the Nevada Supreme Court was Cliff Young, and he had been a congressman before becoming a justice. That was in 1984.

    The two nonjudges pooh-pooh the suggestion that being a sitting judge gives a candidate an edge.

    Schumacher also believes her experience in Family Court makes her an asset to the bench at a time when foster care, child welfare and child custody are major issues in lower courts.

    "I can't fix the foster care system, but I can make sure the court is not the problem with the foster care system."

    Here's a race where it could be a north-south matchup or a Democrat vs. Republican matchup or even a man versus woman matchup. Or it could be decided by who spends the most money to achieve name recognition.

    There will be other races with more fireworks, but this is one to watch.

    Ultimately, it should matter to you in this land of laws in which we live.

    Jane Ann Morrison's column appears Monday, Thursday and Saturday. E-mail her at Jane@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0275.



    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    NLV Resident wrote on May 17, 2008 09:19 PM: The judicial offices are nonpartisan races, and I think its poor reporting by Jane Morrison to declare party affiliation in her article. Besides, party affiliation is immaterial: tell me about them! Have they been disciplined by the Bar at any time? Articles they may have authored? Cases argued and won (or lost) before high courts? Will we elect someone who might cost the state a LOT of money by harassing employees? Party affiliation means nothing. I want to know the legal background of the candidates!


    Here we go again wrote on May 15, 2008 08:53 AM: Allf, a Democrat, has solid support among Nevada Democrats and is president of the Nevada State Bar. Her secret weapon is her husband, political strategist David Thomas, who will give her race his best effort.

    Just what we need. Another JUST US sitting on the Supreme Court.

    According to this statement just bypass the bull $hit and appoint Mrs Rogich or Mrs Reid to the bench. Same outcome.


    JC wrote on May 15, 2008 08:43 AM: Poor RJ...duped into endorsing Halveson. Which one of these four candidates will be Jane's next target? Maybe Jane will get lucky and something really compelling for her to report like one of them will have played "spin the bottle" when they were 13 will come out.


    Dawn wrote on May 15, 2008 08:14 AM: The judges should be non partisan races.

    In Nevada certain law firms use their influence to determine who many of the judges will be.

    Electing a judge because of their work at the state bar is the same as seeing a doctor because he was on the Nevada Medical Board if you get my drift. All connections.

    From the tone of this article it sounds like Jane had another hair appointment and one of her buddies had a little chat with her.

    From the quotes of Mike Cherry in the other article it sounds like someone is pulling strings again. There are much more qualified Justices to quote than the likes of Cherry. I guess Cherry Juice sums it up.


    joan wrote on May 15, 2008 07:20 AM: Halvorsen is only going down because she stood up against the friends and family plan. Vote for any Judge that sticks up for her.
    The Judicial Commission is nothing but a pawn for the annointed. They have dismissed far more serious abuses committed by other Judges.
    Let's see. Phillip Emeory talks to the L.A. Times and his law license went under probation. And we are on the move to remove Halvorson. Does anybody see a pattern here.


    RJNeedsAnEditor wrote on May 15, 2008 06:42 AM: Oh Brother, here she goes again...

    So why no mention of the number of law review articles each candidate has written? No mention of number of "published opinions"? No disgruntled former employees to badmouth the candidates?

    Weren't those supposed to be the ultimate measuring stick of judicial quality??

    Those were the clubs you used to bludgeon Nancy Saitta practically to death. Now, they're not even worth mentioning??

    You have the gall to blame Chairez for making the RJ endorse Halverson? The RJ should take personal responsibility for its own lame behavior.

    Maybe when the RJ's editor gets back from his 7-continent world canoe tour, he can explain why you shouldn't write any additional nonsensical articles about the qualifications of judges!


    b wrote on May 15, 2008 04:53 AM: It does matter to us Erin, and let's hope this election shows it,,, no more career politicians, no more encumbents voted back into office