Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


Senior judges 'a bang for our buck'

Retired jurists made $682,706 in county's 2007 fiscal year

Retired judges and Supreme Court justices who fill in for vacationing, sick and suspended judges earn tens of thousands of dollars each year but on average work fewer hours than sitting judges, state records show.

In Clark County, 11 former judges and justices, known as "senior judges," collectively made $595,818 in fiscal year 2006 and $682,706 in 2007. In fiscal year 2008 through March, senior judges made $574,560.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area
  • SENATOR'S AFFAIR: Hamptons given $96,000 in gifts
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back




  • In one instance, Senior Judge J. Charles Thompson made $129,995 in fiscal year 2007 for working 1,377 hours, the equivalent of about 34 weeks.

    Sitting District Court judges make $130,000 annually and generally work 45 to 55 hours per week, court officials said.

    They said the program saves money and frees elected judges to work regular caseloads in an overburdened court system. Also, they said they can draw on the senior judges' experience.

    "We're really getting a bang for our buck," Nevada Supreme Court Justice Michael Cherry said. The Supreme Court oversees senior judges.

    He said the county saves money by using senior judges because it does not need to hire bailiffs and judicial assistants or build new courtrooms, which it does when new judges are hired.

    Any district judge or Supreme Court justice who retires in good standing can become a senior judge. The Nevada Judicial Discipline Commission reviews their records, and the administrative office of the court annually reviews the judges' work, Cherry said.

    In May, the Supreme Court lowered the hourly salary of former justices who serve as senior judges from $100 an hour to $86 an hour; it lowered the hourly salary for former district judges from $94 to $79, Cherry said.

    The Supreme Court lowered the wage because of the state's budget woes, he said, and not because of any criticism of the program.

    Using a typical 40-hour work week, some senior judges make a slightly higher hourly salary than sitting judges. But Cherry said the senior judges do not get sick or vacation leave and generally do not work full time.

    In fiscal year 2007, Senior Judge James Brennan earned $90,220 for working 955 hours, the equivalent of less than half a year; Senior Judge Stephen Huffaker made $90,109 for working about the same amount of hours; Senior Judge Terrance Marren brought in $104,520 after working 1,206 hours in 2007, records show.

    But Cherry and other officials said the salaries are justified because senior judges work in courtrooms across the state, resolve stalled cases and help in the understaffed court system.

    "The bottom line is we don't have enough horses to cover what needs to be covered. It's a small amount of money compared to asking for more judges," he said.

    In District Court, senior judges have been filling in for District Judge Elizabeth Halverson, who was suspended from the bench in July and continues to draw her $130,000 annual salary.

    They sit in on "specialty court" programs such as drug and mental health courts, District Court spokesman Michael Sommermeyer said.

    Without the senior judges, sitting judges would be pulled off their regular court schedule to work in the specialty courts, he said.

    "For us, it's a very effective use of money," he said.

    The senior judge program started in 1977 on a $300,000 budget but expanded as the state grew. In 2005, the Legislature increased the budget to $1.5 million.

    The program is set for renewal before the Legislature in 2009, and some lawmakers have raised questions.

    Sen. Barbara Cegavske, R-Las Vegas, who sits on the Senate Finance Committee, said her constituents raised concerns about the program because the senior judges are not elected. That, she said, is a big concern she will bring up during the next legislative session.

    "I think we need to revisit it," she said.

    But Sen. Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, who also sits on the committee, said he was an early supporter of the senior judge program and will back it for renewal.

    "The workload is big, and senior judges bring a lot of experience to the job," he said.

    Contact reporter David Kihara at dkihara@eviewjournal.com or 702-380-1039. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    SENIOR JUDGES SERVING IN CLARK COUNTY
    Senior judge Fiscal year 2006 Fiscal year 2007 Fiscal year 2008*
      Hours Wages Hours Wages Hours Wages
    Deborah Agosti 656.75 $66,770 731.75 $74,395 687.50 $69,896
    Joseph Bonaventure -- -- 689.50 $65,092 1,021.00 $96,387
    James Brennan 760.25 $71,771 955.67 $90,220 686.50 $64,809
    Stephen Huffaker 887.00 $83,737 954.50 $90,109 -- --
    Jack Lehman 523.75 $49,444 400.00 $37,762 84.00 $7,930
    Terrance Marren 1,005.10 $85,553 1,206.00 $104,520 1,045.50 $90,610
    John McGroarty 110.00 $10,385 450.50 $42,529 398.00 $37,573
    Joseph Pavlikowski 850.50 $80,291 129.50 $12,225 -- --
    Robert Rose -- -- 91.50 $9,302 547.75 $55,688
    Miriam Shearing 495.25 $50,350 261.25 $26,560 495.50 $50,376
    J. Charles Thompson 1,033.00 $97,520 1,377.00 $129,995 1,073.00 $101,296

    * Through March 2008
    Source: Nevada Supreme Court (Figures were rounded.)
    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Mamamia wrote on May 15, 2008 09:47 PM: Others may not agree with me but I think the pay scale for government employees are way out of line for any sane society. Why should these public servants live like kings and queens while we, the taxpayer, live in poverty and such dire straights that we cannot even afford to get the bare necessities of life? It doesn't make sense. What about serving the public as an honorable duty rather than a means to riches and luxuries that most of the taxpayers will never ever have?


    Rodman wrote on May 15, 2008 01:19 PM: Looks like these senior judges just pulled another rip-cord on one of their many State of Nevada golden parachutes. Look at the numbers, analyze their pay and you will see they are getting more cash than the LV fireman, cops and all full time city, county, and state employees. And the beat goes on; its no wonder the state is going broke, these people are making as much as, or more than hotel and casino CEO'S.


    While your talking to Cherry wrote on May 15, 2008 10:20 AM: Ask him about his free Superbowl tickets. Ask him about the side business Spoor was running from his office. Ask about the Spoors that donate all that money to his campaign.

    Ask him why Saitta has been laying low lately. Ask him if Jessie Walsh is taking her place.


    Cherry a bad choice for Nevada wrote on May 15, 2008 09:14 AM: Cherry is a bad choice for Nevada. Plenty of JUICE.


    No Financial Disclosures wrote on May 15, 2008 09:07 AM: The senior judges generally jump ship before elections. This way they still can get paid, keep their juice and not have to disclose their financial ties.

    A scheme devised by judges for judges with no accountability.

    Read the past articles on Pavlokowski. Start with the LA TIMES.
    The Nevada Judicial Discipline Commission reviews their records, and the administrative office of the court annually reviews the judges' work, Cherry said.

    This is a joke.


    Dan wrote on May 15, 2008 08:28 AM: "We're really getting a bang for our buck," Nevada Supreme Court Justice Michael Cherry said. The Supreme Court oversees senior judges.



    Is the "We're" Cherry is referring to the "Cartel" that is running through our judicial system?



    J Charles Thompson is a personal long time friend of Mike Cherry's. Nice to have your friend as your boss.



    How many cases has Thompson run interference on???




    joan wrote on May 15, 2008 07:30 AM: BJ, what's wrong with Nevada is prior mob influence that created a look the other way system.


    Tom wrote on May 15, 2008 07:19 AM: It would be interesting to know how much the state spends on travel expenses, hotel bills, meals, rental cars, etc for the retired judges. This would give a better picture of the costs.


    rjC wrote on May 15, 2008 06:18 AM: It's all about the 'bang for the big bucks' and really nothing else.


    BJ wrote on May 15, 2008 04:53 AM: Here is a thought. Sit on those over zellous cops who are filling the courts with the everyday citizen, for petty issues, then you wouldn't need so many high paid corrupt judges.

    Nevada is one of the few states that is so busy in the legal department, cop, judges and prison, that nothing else is allowed to occur. One reason the schools are having problems. No one wants to graduate.

    Las Vegas and Henderson manages a production line of people in the court rooms just paying fines. Hundreds in not thousands a day. Snake lines of citizens lined up to be judges and paying fines.

    If this area wan't a "Police State", and more user-friendly, then maybe the visitors travel alert would be lifted, and people would be able to live without having some, young cop shoot to death pregnant women and mothers, and abusing the community to make a buck.

    Reduce the cops and judges and you reduce the cost and save the budget. Simple economics.

    Nevada's new slogan should be "Enter at your own risk."

    You don't see this kind of massive amounts of police and court abuse in other states. So whats wrong with Nevada?


    Read All Comments