Web Site Analytics
MobileRJ | RSS Twitter Twitter FacebookFacebook E-mail Alerts
Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News
May. 16, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Thomas wants DA kicked off corruption case

Ex-UMC chief says office represented him

By DAVID KIHARA
REVIEW-JOURNAL

Lacy Thomas
Former UMC official charged with steering contracts to friends

An attorney for former University Medical Center CEO Lacy Thomas is trying to get the Clark County district attorney's office thrown off the former hospital executive's corruption case.

Citing what he called a conflict of interest, Daniel Albregts told District Judge Michael Villani that county prosecutors should be replaced with a special prosecutor without ties to the district attorney's office. The district attorney's office represented Thomas while he was CEO of UMC and therefore shouldn't prosecute a former client, he said.

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: When live news shots turn bad
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Lance Burton renews contract
  • NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area
  • Motorcyclist killed in collision with CAT bus
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • Motorcyclist killed in crash with SUV at Durango and Sahara
  • OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING: Police account is disputed
  • Motorcyclist killed after hitting light pole
  • Interstate 15 projects pile up




    • Among other things, the district attorney's office gave Thomas legal advice on contracts, he said.

    Chief Deputy District Attorney Scott Mitchell disputed Albregts' claims. He said county attorneys provide limited legal advice to county officials and don't have an "attorney-client" relationship.

    County attorneys once advised Thomas that a contract was illegal and that it needed to go before the hospital's board, he said. The advice didn't go beyond that, he said.

    Mitchell also argued the district attorney's office is responsible for prosecuting county employees.

    The office is prosecuting several Las Vegas police officers, as well as former county Recorder Fran Deane and former County Commissioner Lynette Boggs.

    Deane is facing charges that she accepted money to sell copies of information she was supposed to keep for the public. A grand jury indicted Boggs on allegations that she lied about living in her district.

    "The law requires that the county prosecute county officers. You can't gloss over that fact," he said.

    A grand jury in February indicted Thomas on five counts of theft and five counts of misconduct of a public officer. Authorities allege that Thomas used his position at the hospital to steer lucrative contracts to friends.

    Villani scheduled a hearing on the issue for June 16.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Robert wrote on May 16, 2008 01:33 PM: Not too close. That is the DA's job" prosecute alleged criminals. This is an alleged criminal.

    The District Attorney's Office NEVER represented Lacy Thomas. The District Attorney's Office represented UMC and the County's role with UMC. UMC is not a party to the prosecution; it is the victim of the crime. This is a creative legal assertion that is also a complete nonsequitur.


    FF wrote on May 16, 2008 08:28 AM: LACY THOMAS NEEDS A GOOD ASS WHOOPING !


    tooclose wrote on May 16, 2008 08:20 AM: Citing what he called a conflict of interest, Daniel Albregts told District Judge Michael Villani that county prosecutors should be replaced with a special prosecutor without ties to the district attorney's office. The district attorney's office represented Thomas while he was CEO of UMC and therefore shouldn't prosecute a former client, he said.
    They should bow out of this since it is a conflict of interest. There's too much rubbing noses going on as it is in there.