Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

News


McCain's Yucca talk gets low-key response

One source says idea won't even be discussed

There was muted reaction on Capitol Hill and among nuclear industry representatives on Wednesday to Arizona Sen. John McCain's proposal that the United States participate in an international nuclear waste repository.

With the Department of Energy finally ready to seek a license to build a nuclear waste site at Yucca Mountain, the candidate's comments could divert attention from that achievement, an industry official said.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • Reid shares Senate ideas
  • NORM: TV journalist fired after ad reported
  • NORM: Wedding upsets Daddy Geldof
  • Woman dies in I-15 crash
  • NORM: Caesars security detains Semel
  • NORM: 40/40 Club buzz may mean a sale
  • No cards ... only computers
  • TRAUMA DEPARTMENT: Doctor challenges UMC
  • GRAND CANYON: Dam fails, scores are evacuated
  • NORM: LV condo is focus of divorce hearing



  • DOE officials are expected to submit a repository application next week to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ending more than a decade of delay.

    McCain "put the flag up there and I did not see anyone in Congress saluting it," said the official who asked not to be identified because his company was not commenting on the proposal.

    "It is so far removed from where we are in policy circles that I can't imagine it being discussed, even in bar talk," the official said.

    After McCain's speech Tuesday in Denver where he said that an international nuclear waste site "could make it unnecessary" to open a facility at Yucca Mountain, his aides suggested he was thinking more along the lines of supporting Russia establishing a site in Siberia where nuclear waste from Asian and European nations might be guarded.

    "The international spent fuel repository, first and foremost, is about what to do with spent fuel that resides in other countries," said Randy Scheunemann, McCain's senior foreign policy adviser.

    But McCain is willing "to entertain the possibility that if the spent fuel repository is up and running, if the security and safeguards are sufficient that we could possibility send some of our spent fuel there too," Scheunemann said.

    The concept of a single repository overseas for smaller nations and those with nuclear power startups makes sense, but not for the United States, which produces most of the world's commercial nuclear waste, said Per Peterson, a nuclear engineering professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

    "It just would not be logical for the United States to send its spent fuel someplace else," Peterson said. "It would be a large-scale process to transport."

    If the United States were to reprocess its nuclear waste, it would not be a large technical challenge to ship overseas the residuals from recycling, Peterson said.

    But even if nuclear waste from commercial power plants were shipped elsewhere, a U.S. repository would still be needed for highly radioactive waste generated by the military over the years, Peterson said.

    "It is difficult for me to see sending those materials to an international repository," he said. "I think that stuff, we really want to handle ourselves."

    "Senator McCain was on the correct track in advocating for an international repository, but the remark about it providing an alternative to Yucca Mountain probably was off the cuff and probably in retrospect was misspoken," Peterson said.

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau chief Steve Tetreault at STetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.



    Leave Your Comment 1 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Abe Van Luik wrote on May 31, 2008 07:12 AM: There is an organization that has as its purpose the promotion of international cooperative repositories for high-level radioactive wastes. Their website is http://www.arius-world.org/ and gives an explanation of what their motive and approach is.