Vegas wrote on June 04, 2008 01:22 PM: Hey Alicia, Tiffany Masters is probably going to drag your ass to court over this one!

Hello wrote on June 04, 2008 11:13 AM: Who the hell is Alicia Jacobs! She couldn't even get the Katie Rees story right on "E" she said the photos where found on my space WRONG! the little scumbag that took the photos sold them to a rag and that is how they got to the net. Alicia should stick to her 10 minutes of boring news. Vegas is the only place she is known and let's keep it that way! And Tara Conner is in deep trouble because she is stuck under Trumps thumb. Good luck Tara you will need it.

dave wrote on May 30, 2008 05:15 PM: Why write insulting comments about Alicia Jacobs? She's a beautiful, intelligent, accomplished journalist.
People like Katie Reese & Tiffany Masters are the ones deserving of bashing. They are pitiful & degrading women.

Alicia Jacobs wrote on May 30, 2008 02:31 PM: Foxy Brown --- You are seriously misguided. I won't do ANYTHING for a story... I'll DO ANYBODY for a story!

Get it straight next time.

Foxy Brown wrote on May 30, 2008 01:44 PM: Alicia Jacobs is no position to call anyone 'misguided'. She will do ANYTHING for a story - just ask her.

JLOKC wrote on May 30, 2008 10:24 AM: California law means nothing in Nevada. Each state has their own rules on divorce. Lawyers usually cite cases from another state when their case is very weak.

oldlawdawg wrote on May 30, 2008 10:10 AM: Unlike most state constitutions, the Nevada Constitution expressly provides for an individual right of privacy. That constitutional right supports the validity of the Nevada statute allowing erither party to seral divorce proceedings, a practice entirely consistent with the 'no fault' nature of Nevada's divorce laws which render such things as marital infidelity irrelevant and inadmissible in order to, in part, prevent divorce proceedings from devolving into a forum for character assasination where settlements are forced by what amounts to extorsion given that either party can make any allegations about the other they please with complete immunity from liability.


The manner in which Dawn Gibbons and Cal Dunlap are conducting themselves is far more sleezy and indicative oif bad character than the allegations of infidelity made against the Governor (whom I do not particularly like or support but belive should enjoy the same protections as any other party to a divorce action. None of this stuff ios even relevant to a divorce in Nevada, so it should not come out in these proceedings even if the case is not sealed. Dunlap is being uncharactoristically mean-spirited in this matter, probably because he sees it as an opportunity for the state Democratic Party, but his arguments are so thin he should be questioned by the State Bar Ethics Panel (which he has, no doubt, probabaly sat on before) as the allegations are irrelevant and inadmissible even if not privileged, and it is unethical to repeatedly urge inadmissible evidence or seek unwarranted publicity.

Just get divorced, for godssakes!

you wrote on May 30, 2008 08:21 AM: So, um, just what sport do the Wranglers play?

reno.muse wrote on May 30, 2008 05:42 AM: Hats off to you for catching the Ron Burkle/Bill Clinton connection!

I saw that and wondered if anyone in the media in Nevada was smart enough to pick that one up. How much money did Burkle just pay Billbo? Millions, you say? Wow!