Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


Homeowners, you can almost touch bottom

Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?

That's not just an endless series of queries from road-weary kids on summer vacation. It's also become the plaintive cry of local homeowners desperately seeking the bottom of a housing market that has shed more than 20 percent of its value in the last year.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Police ask: Are there others?
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas



  • Las Vegas homeowners could have their answer soon.

    A Monday report, plus a few springtime indicators thrown in for good measure, hints that the city's housing market may be at or near its nadir.

    The latest House Prices in America study from Massachusetts research firm Global Insight and Ohio bank-holding company National City Corp. showed Southern Nevada's first move toward housing-market undervaluation since the companies launched their joint report in 2004.

    At $232,600 in the first quarter, the median home price in Las Vegas fell 3.1 percent below the value that historical market trends establish as sensible or healthy, the House Prices in America analysis said.

    That's compared to the 22.9 percent overvaluation the market saw in the first quarter of 2007, when the median price came in at $286,100.

    It's also down from the fourth quarter's $258,900 median price and 9.2 percent overvaluation.

    At its highest point, in the third quarter of 2006, the Las Vegas market was overvalued by 30.4 percent.

    Today's valuation statistics mean housing prices in Las Vegas have returned to their 23-year "historic norms" based on household income, population density, interest rates and other factors, said Richard DeKaser, chief economist for National City.

    Las Vegas also placed well below several regional markets in its valuation ranking. Los Angeles, for example, remains 15.4 percent overvalued at its median price of $432,200.

    Phoenix, with a median price of $224,900, is 20.2 percent overvalued, the report said. Salt Lake City is 16.1 percent overvalued at a median of $265,700. Reno has reached equilibrium, with its median price of $251,500 coming in at 0.2 percent below its historic norm.

    "I would describe Las Vegas as a fairly valued market," DeKaser said. "It presents fair purchasing opportunities for home buyers. And if prices are fairly valued, I would think it's a reasonable time to buy, if you're making your decision based on whether you find an area attractive for family, friends, employment opportunities and climate. People should not be making these (buying) decisions based on the view that they're going to gain 20 percent a year for the next 20 years."

    Despite the Las Vegas market's foray into negative historical-pricing territory, DeKaser stopped short of calling Las Vegas homes undervalued.

    National City classifies the range between 15 percent above the pricing baseline and 15 percent below it as fairly valued, so the city has a way to go before it's positioned for significant appreciation jumps.

    But Las Vegas no longer occupies a spot on National City's "watch list," a roster of markets risking price declines of 10 percent or more for two years or longer.

    "One thing which is clear is that the majority of Las Vegas' price correction is now behind it," DeKaser said.

    Local observers said the Global Insight/National City analysis makes sense.

    Researchers at Sullivan Group Real Estate Advisors recently assessed where local new-home prices would be if the Las Vegas market had appreciated at normal rates of 5 percent to 7 percent a year since 2002. They found prices would be around $256,000, a difference of just a few thousand dollars compared with the $260,000 median new-home price industry researcher Hanley Wood shows now, said Ken Perlman, vice president of Sullivan Group.

    That indicates a return to sustainable pricing trends.

    "It's a positive sign that the market is headed in a direction where we might see some stabilization," Perlman said. "It suggests buying a home in Las Vegas is becoming more of a reasonable proposition. I do agree the biggest price declines are behind us."

    Add local home builder Tom McCormick to the list of believers.

    He comes armed with statistics: Las Vegas posted a 68 percent increase in resale closings from December to April. Median asking prices on existing homes stabilized at $230,000 in March and April. Resale inventory fell from 14 months to 11 months in April.

    Such figures likely mean the faltering housing market will even out soon, he said.

    "I know what it costs to build a home, and these homes can't be replaced at the prices they're being sold for. We builders have been arguing for a long time that we can't build homes at the prices they're being sold for. By definition, (the decline) can't go farther."

    But analysts aren't so sure the price declines have ended.

    Brian Gordon, a principal in local economic-research firm Applied Analysis, said he sees potential for additional value cuts. But future pricing declines probably would be "modest," Gordon said, and buyers who plan to live in their homes for a year or more are "less likely to be harmed by any additional devaluation."

    "We're certainly approaching the bottom at this point."

    Gordon's firm predicts the market will reach its low point by year's end. It'll "drag along the bottom" for six months to a year, with flat asking prices, and return to single-digit appreciation by late 2009 or early 2010.

    Perlman said he also foresees a leisurely recovery pace. Sales could stay sluggish for several more months as buyers, spooked at the prospect of potential price drops, sit on the sidelines a little longer. And tightened credit markets for consumers looking to borrow remain a "wild card," he said.

    DeKaser said his analysis can't forecast how much more local prices might fall, or when the valuation slide might stop.

    But he did offer this general prognosis: "We're much closer to the bottom than the top."

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.

    LAS VEGAS HOME PRICES
    House prices in Las Vegas have fallen into undervalued territory, according to new data from research firm Global Insight and bank National City Corp. It’s the first time in five years that statistics from the first quarter have shown undervalued housing prices here:
    First quarter of each year
      2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
    Local median price $296,000 $259,800 $290,200 $286,100 $232,600
    Value change
    from historic norm
    +3.7% +20.7% +29.9% +22.9% -3.1%
    Source: Global Insight/National City Corp.


    Leave Your Comment 55 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    happycamper wrote on June 05, 2008 10:22 PM: i feel sorry for all the negative remarks and all the blaming. is it possible because a lot got caught up with the scheme of buying houses when in reality they didnt even have the cash in hand to purchase a new sofa? stop blaming and own up to your own mistakes.
    stop reading if you dont like what you read. i believe in doing research to protect one self, instead of jumping off the bridge just because someone said so.
    i feel sorry for those who thinks its cheap to build homes. what planet are you from? the price of land has appreciated since i dont know what year you folks are comparing it to add the fact that the cost of material and labor has gone up as well. its common sense people. you dont have to know economics to know that builders cant simply build to compete with current prices? wishful thinking, i guess. stop wasting your time being bitter, instead focus on saving money for that dream house you've always wanted.


    pablo sanchez wrote on June 05, 2008 02:13 AM: i've always said you can't pay california prices on las vegas wages, anybody know what the median wage is for las vegas. this housing slide will go all the way back to 1998. also when people are cutting back on spending the first thing to go is entertainment. say goodbye to "service, retail, gaming, hospitality, etc. jobs".
    i used to go to my local station casino everyday after work, but since i was laid off and had to find new work at significantly less pay, those days are long gone...i've lived through a couple of these recessions and they've always started with rising gas prices and they didn't go away overnight, so sit tight and hang on it's going to be rough ride for at least the next five years.


    mikey wrote on June 05, 2008 12:54 AM: Joseph Smith and all of his sheep had to stop screwing little girls, ah I mean marrying them, and ah of course J man was the prophet and all, ya know...you can especially tell he was the prophet by his translation of the golden tablets into a really bad attempt at Old King James style English...you know God decoded them in Old King James style English to J man, I mean a really bad attempt at King James English, because that's how they talked in Utah at the time...hey wait a second...they didn't talk that way back then, they talked American English...maybe ole Joseph Smith was pulling a fast one on us by trying to sound all biblical and all, cause God wouldn't have talked to him in a bad version of King James English, God would have used the vernacular of the day...that dirty old man just wanted to get some extra on the side and used idiot illiterate followers who had only heard the bible in King James versions, so ole J Smith had to try and copy it...don’t' believe me? Read the book o Mormon; see fer yerself...oh yee of little faith, ye. Yep, read REAL King James English in the Bible or elswhere, then, compare the grammer and writing to the book o morman and you will see how idiotic the whole idea really is…I mean come on.


    Johnny wrote on June 05, 2008 12:54 AM: Hey, Former LV Man

    The jobs created by strip properties are by and far CRAP jobs that pay little, and do NOT pay enough to buy a house in LV at the median price. They are SERVICE SECTOR jobs, no skill.
    Those jobs buy $100 per sq ft homes, not $200 sq ft homes, and now that tip earners have to PTOVE income and can no longer "state" income by law, the housing is going to continue to slide down.

    Jenifer R is just eating up spin and reporting it as news and people like you are sheep.

    I LOVE THE FALLING HOUSE PRICES! I RENT!


    VegasGurl wrote on June 04, 2008 08:05 PM: Wonder what the percentage of Pending (P Status) sales actually close and go into S status these days. Any agents know?


    Whopper boy wrote on June 04, 2008 06:56 PM: Hey David Johann, watch your Whopper! Without us, you'd go hungry. I've been flippin meat and homes for 10 years.


    David Johann wrote on June 04, 2008 06:44 PM: ALL OF THE OPINIONS BELOW ARE ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS.

    All of the "analyses" below are whatever the poster, many of whom work at places like Burger King and have never had a course in economics, believe.

    Would you like fries with that?


    Former LV Man wrote on June 04, 2008 06:10 PM: "LV Renter," you couldn't be less informed if you tried. First of all, Vegas homes haven't sold for $100 per square foot since the 90s... The early 90s at that. Second, the strip building boom is not coming to an end, but the projects that are nearing completion are going to result in thousands of new jobs (not construction jobs, but service, retail, gaming, hospitality, etc. jobs) for people who will be working at these new properties - City Center, Frontier, etc.


    D- wrote on June 04, 2008 05:04 PM: Will the market go up or down?


    I dont know, but a good rule of thumb in this market is not to overpay. If the Realtor tells you there are no other offers you can usually get the property anywhere from list to a few thousand below. If there are 3 other offers list to a few thousand above. If there are more than 5 offers they are getting very aggressive.


    jttri wrote on June 04, 2008 04:42 PM: Yhea right


    Read All Comments