Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


GOP sets date to complete state convention in Reno

Paul backer still plans attempt at wildcat gathering

The Nevada Republican Party on Wednesday set July 26 as the date for delegates to meet in Reno and complete the state convention that fell apart in April.

The party's executive committee approved the date in a Wednesday evening teleconference. The re-convention, like the original convention effort, is to be held at the Peppermill Hotel Casino.


Most Popular Stories
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • The original convention, on April 26, was called off when national convention delegates couldn't be elected in the time allotted. Party leaders blamed a rule change pushed by supporters of presidential candidate Ron Paul, who represented a large proportion of the more than 1,300 convention delegates.

    The state convention elects 31 members of Nevada's delegation to the Republican National Convention, scheduled to be held in St. Paul, Minn., in early September.

    "We are excited about completing business and moving on towards our end goal of electing Republicans in November," Sue Lowden, chairwoman of the Nevada Republican Party, said in a statement. She said all the delegates from the original convention would be notified by mail of the date.

    Paul supporters had been trying to jump-start the convention conclusion by offering to pick up the tab for a venue. Sparks dentist Wayne Terhune twice proposed dates in June and called on convention delegates to show up at the Grand Sierra Resort and finish the convention.

    Last week, Terhune announced that a convention would be June 28 and said he believed enough delegates would come to create a quorum and elect national delegates.

    Terhune said he was disappointed by the party's new convention date, which doesn't leave much time before the deadline of 30 days before the national convention to get the delegation selected. "If anything goes amiss, I'm concerned Nevada would not have a delegation properly elected," he said. It also wouldn't leave national delegates much time to book flights and hotel rooms to St. Paul, he noted.

    Terhune said the attempt to hold a wildcat convention on the 28th would go forward.

    "From a delegate standpoint, our solution is better, so we plan to go ahead," he said. "We feel optimistic about our chances to get a quorum and call the convention out of recess."

    Terhune and others, frustrated with weeks of waiting for an announcement, accused the party of dragging its feet. But Zac Moyle, the executive director, said the party was simply proceeding in a deliberate manner.

    "We're trying to pick a day that maximizes turnout," he said.

    Moyle said party bylaws won't allow a rump convention such as that being planned by the Paul faction. If it convenes and elects national delegates, they won't be recognized, he said.

    The Republican National Committee has been following the process and working with the state party to ensure that Nevada does send a delegation to the national convention, at which John McCain will be officially crowned the party's presidential nominee. McCain came in third in Nevada's Jan. 19 presidential caucuses, while Paul was second.

    An RNC official indicated that the state party would have authority over the delegation.

    "The RNC will recognize the official slate of national convention delegates as submitted by each state party," the official said.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Robert Holloway wrote on June 07, 2008 05:58 PM: The following link is from Reno TV which has provided much better coverage of the situation than the Las Vegas media.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ7YaqelM3k


    Report abuse

    Robert Holloway wrote on June 07, 2008 05:54 PM: The Las Vegas newspapers have not done a good job of reporting on the recessed convention. One important fact that is always left out is that the convention was recessed contrary to the rules of the convention. The recess should have been subject to a vote. The leadership did not do that because they knew they would lose the vote. The only way they could stop an outcome that they did not want was to end the convention. The RJ and other newspapers have not reported on this unethical aspect of the halting of the convention.


    Report abuse

    Clay Season wrote on June 05, 2008 11:34 PM: This comment is for whoever is in charge of the RJ. Several times you have reported on this mess and you always fail to present the REAL story to your readers. You always report the Party leaders story. (Does Stalinist Russia come to mind?) The RJ has reported several times the Paul supporters caused the delay because they wanted a rule changed.

    Dear Mr. RJ, the REAL story is what was the rule they wanted changed. The rule the "Party" tried to shove down our throats was the Party leaders wanted to control the electing of the delegates. They prepared THEIR list of who would be the nominees. All they wanted from "we the people" was to vote AYE and accept THEIR list, making THEIR choices the delegates from NV. And to top it off, they wouldn't even show us who was on THEIR list before we voted for it!

    The delay came about because we insisted we the people could nominate and vote for the delegates of our choice. We rejected THEIR secretly prepared list. We rejected the notion we should vote AYE without even seeing who was on THEIR list. The purpose of the Convention was to nominate and elect delegates to represent the PEOPLE of Nevada. The Convention is the tool by which the people exercise THEIR choice, not the Party leaders choice.

    Mr. RJ, for you to constantly report the Paul supporters caused the delay by calling for a rule change and never explain why is not very good journalism, is it? Don't you think you owe your paying customers a bit more of the truth and a little less parroting of what the "Party leaders" told you what the story was?


    Report abuse

    DRUMZ wrote on June 05, 2008 12:27 PM: The Nevada GOP is a joke. No credibility... just downright embarrassing. I can't believe I'm still registered as a Republican.

    Here's a thought: Liberty is a GOOD thing.


    Report abuse

    Sandra wrote on June 05, 2008 10:35 AM: The NVGOP will be two days too late to reconvene the convention before the 90 day deadline. After 90 days the rules state that the convention will be voided and no delegate will be sent. I will take my chances with the June 26 convention.

    BTW, Who was the RNC official you had sourced?


    Report abuse

    MediaWatcher wrote on June 05, 2008 08:30 AM: Moyle is a tool. An ex-shoe salesman with no credentials. The party masters do not want the voice of the people to be heard. Doesn't matter, Zacy boy cause you can't keep us, the Paul supporters, from attending the convention.


    Report abuse

    Aaron wrote on June 05, 2008 06:20 AM: Terhune's got it right!