Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

News


JOHN L. SMITH: Let's hope walkout after CityCenter death puts safety ahead of speed

The family and friends of Dustin Tarter gathered Saturday in Boulder City to say goodbye to the 39-year-old crane oiler.

He wasn't the most important workingman among the more than 6,000 employed on the enormous CityCenter site on May 31 when he got caught in the counterweight system of a moving crane and was crushed. Tarter was just trying to do his job. He was the sixth construction worker to die in the past 16 months at CityCenter.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • Alleging fraud, authorities raid voter group
  • NORM: Simpson planned acquittal party
  • Nevada's economy dead last
  • NORM: Hard-core fans ask: Has Jacko moved?
  • NORM: Letterman gives an 'A' to O.J. jury
  • Judge: Attacker 'gleeful'
  • NORM: 13th Agassi slam another big hit
  • Circle of friends surrounds lost pal
  • 'REALLY, REALLY CLOSE': Obama edges McCain in poll
  • The Biggest loser



  • Like the others, "Doobie" Tarter left behind people who loved him and a personal story of a life cut short on the job. For his part, Tarter loved to keep his pals laughing. He lived to catch big fish and adored his dog, Luna. That dog was so special, in fact, that his family listed it in Tarter's obituary.

    Set that small life and the others who went before against the background of a $9.2 billion construction project that swims in superlatives. With its 18 million square feet of public space, CityCenter is touted as the largest privately financed development in the history of the United States. It's called one of the largest "green" development projects in the world.

    It's also financed by some of the world's richest people. In addition to MGM Mirage, the investment entity of the Persian Gulf state of Dubai has spent nearly $5 billion to buy into the city within a city.

    They call the project many things. But here's one name no one calls it.

    Safest.

    That's one of the problems with promoting yourself as the best of the best. It leaves no room for excuses and no place to hide from what, by any reasonable person's measure, is a shocking and unacceptable carnage.

    The question is whether much will change following last week's one-day walkout by workers affiliated with the Southern Nevada Building and Construction Trades Council, which quickly negotiated an agreement with general contractor Perini Building Co. for increased safety oversight.

    The scale of the project poses challenges on many levels. While construction workers came running to land good-paying jobs at CityCenter, building trades officials say their knowledge of standard safety practices is inconsistent. Meanwhile, the state's critics argue too few inspectors have roamed the construction site.

    Was the Nevada Occupational Safety and Health Administration ill-prepared -- and arguably unwilling -- to levy hard scrutiny at powerful Perini?

    Building trades officials have complained for weeks that, even when OSHA found safety violations, the fines were reduced or eliminated altogether. And when it's acceptable to eliminate safety equipment such as those last-chance nets that might have saved the life of one fallen worker, there's something wrong with the system.

    Following the negotiations, and with an assist from Gov. Jim Gibbons, federal OSHA inspectors will join state inspectors to review the job site. The move appears to be unprecedented, but then so is the scale of CityCenter.

    "We're very pleased to see the governor and OSHA have finally decided it was time to get involved," building trades consultant Steve Redlinger says. "That's great, and we welcome them, but we needed this months ago. Why it took them so long, I don't know. I can't answer that. We're happy to have them now, but we think it's overdue."

    One concession that could pay dividends is the agreement to let the Center for Construction Research and Training conduct an on-site safety assessment. Union officials and safety inspectors will also be allowed on the job.

    I'm no OSHA inspector, but I suspect the 24-hour, seven-day work schedule, the high-steel construction done at close quarters, and the shortage of experienced craftsmen are contributing factors to the safety problems.

    I won't bet they'll slow the pace, but it's possible that to really make a difference all the parties will have to agree to put safety ahead of breakneck speed to end the death toll that so far reads, "Mark Wescoat, Harold Billingsley, Harvey Englander, Bobby Lee Tohannie, Angel J. Hernandez, and Dustin Tarter."

    They weren't big shots, just workingmen. Each lost his life building this latest, greatest monument to the superlative-laced Las Vegas experience.

    CityCenter's construction workers, a cynical bunch, have their own nickname for the project.

    They've been calling it "City Cemetery" for months.

    John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0295.



    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Steve Ross needs the boot wrote on June 08, 2008 11:42 AM: Steve Ross needs to be relieved of both his union job and city council job.



    SPFPAUNIONYES wrote on June 08, 2008 11:37 AM: Memorial Site to Bring Awareness
    to The Safety Issues at
    MGM Mirage
    City Center Project
    and all other Las Vegas Construction Sites!

    http://www.spfpalocal7777.org/SAFETYFIRSTATCITYCENTER.html


    tim wrote on June 08, 2008 11:07 AM: constuction workers are only as safe as they want to be,no amount of safety training will change that.i work there and it is a safe as every other hotel build in town.just lke smokey bear said only you can prevent ..........fill in the blank.


    Perini Supporter wrote on June 08, 2008 07:57 AM: John.... There have been 3 entirely different issues at play here. 1. Safety. Perini does an excellent job promoting and maintaining safety. They expect the Union Employees to show up on the jobsite already trained in basic common sense safety. By LAW, the Subcontractors are responsible for safety training, however, since most of their field hands are only temps. the subs expect the Unions to provide this type of "common sense" training. 2. A good portion of the Employees on this jobsite, have never worked in an environment like this one, as they are either "white tickets" (those just hired from the non union housing and light commercial market), or they are travelers from other local unions, that have also never worked in a high rise environment, thus they were NEVER trained properly in safety to do their job. The 3rd issue, and the one that is relative to the walkout last week, has to do with good old fasioned greed by the Unions themselves. Each week that this job progresses, the Unions put approximately $2,000,000.00 into their pocket, (6000 employees X 40 hrs X $8.00 per hour). The walkout had nothing to do with safety, other than the fact that it gave the Unions an avenue to slow down the job and make more $$$. We all wish and pray for a safe job, but exploiting the safety in the name of Dollars is just wrong !!


    charlie wrote on June 08, 2008 07:39 AM: Each and every person working on a job site must work safely for safety to happen and it really is up to the contractors and sub contractors to make sure that really happens.
    Having said that, these contractors and sub contractors having little more then a hand full of permanent employees rely entirely on the unions to quickly ratchet up to the hundreds of well qualified employees in the form of workers and supervisors necessary to tackle large projects such as the city center. The unions therefore must take nearly all, if not all of the blame for unsafe work practices. Union hired help is advertised as the best help money can buy and as is evident in this case that simply is not true.

    Previous large las vegas job sites have a history of the taking of workers lives. Some were killed by their own doing while others were killed by the unsafe actions of others.

    I seem to recall something like 5 or 6 workers killed per year during the last construction boom in the late 1990's.


    CityCenterEmployee wrote on June 08, 2008 07:27 AM: John,

    In response to your article, let me just remind you of one thing, and that being that no matter how much you teach safety and enforce it, there are going to be those employees that will just not listen and not follow the rules step by step to ensure their own safety. They, not the company, are the ones that sometimes will take the shortcuts and end up dead like this fellow did. There is nothing that the Company can do about that. Oh sure, we can have the offender immediately removed off the job site, if we catch him committing a safety violation before he dies. But then after completing a Union approved "safety course," (which he had completed before) he will be back on the jobsite in no time at all.

    Then you have "Operator error." People who are just not paying attention to their surroundings, such as may have been the case with this gentleman. Again, you can teach safety until you are blue in the face and it will not matter to someone who is just not paying attention. To blame the company is to forget one thing: that the most effective method in ensuring safety is the worker themselves. If something looks dangerous, then don't do it. Period. If something doesn't feel right, then don't do it, period. You'll go home alive at the end of the day.
    Also, if the site is so unsafe, as this article claims, then there would be an astronomical amount more of deaths, but there aren't.
    As an employee of Perini, I know first hand that we, as a company, place strict standards of safety upon everyone. We desire that everyone go home at the end of the day