Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


McCarran security scans won't be for the bashful

So how tight is security at America's airports these days?

Pretty darned tight, if you ask Alabamian Stan Tew.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area
  • SENATOR'S AFFAIR: Hamptons given $96,000 in gifts
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back




  • "Soon, we'll all be wearing Speedos and thongs, with terry-cloth robes, opening up and doing a flash as we go through (checkpoints)," said Tew, as he sat inside The Forum Shops at Caesars Palace Tuesday.

    But the nation's Transportation Security Administration is one step -- or actually, a lot of steps -- ahead of Tew.

    The agency is rolling out body-scanning machines that generate revealing images of people underneath their clothes. The idea: to read whether a traveler is toting contraband or dangerous items banned on airplanes. One of the $180,000 devices is headed for McCarran International Airport, where it'll take up residence at the security checkpoints under construction for the airport's C gates, said Dwayne Baird, a spokesman for the Transportation Security Administration. The checkpoints are scheduled to open in August.

    Showed samples of the images Tuesday, tourists at Caesars Palace expressed mixed feelings on the technology. Almost all said the technology wouldn't deter them from future trips here, though some had serious reservations about the explicit nature of the machines' images.

    "That's disgusting looking," said Alma Castellanos, a visitor from Lincoln, Calif. "That's hideous. I don't approve of that at all. If they had those at the airport, I think I'd detour myself somewhere else. I'd go out of my way to avoid that."

    But Tina and Lee Kirby, a husband and wife from Bournemouth, England, liked the pending security measure.

    "It doesn't bother me at all," said Tina Kirby, who married her husband in Las Vegas 14 years ago and visits the Strip with him at least twice a year. "Anything to heighten security and make it safer is better. I wouldn't have any issue with it at all."

    Security officials initially plan to use the scanners as an additional layer of security, rather than as a substitute for current screening.

    After passengers have cleared metal detectors, those selected for further screening will be directed to the device, according to a USA Today description of the process from the Baltimore-Washington International Airport, where two of the devices are in use.

    Once inside, subjects raise their arms and the device uses "millimeter waves" to peer through clothing to detect whether the passenger is concealing suspected contraband.

    A TSA worker in a separate room looks at black-and-white images from the device, which will be shaded differently from passengers' bodies.

    If the worker suspects an illicit item, he or she uses a radio to notify a worker at the checkpoint to search the passenger.

    A TSA spokesman at Baltimore-Washington said the imaging process could eventually replace traditional metal detectors and pat-down searches, which could save time by making security screening more efficient, USA Today said.

    Las Vegas tourists were likelier to embrace the machines if the devices were to displace metal detectors altogether.

    Lee Kirby wears boots with steel in the soles, and his mother-in-law has artificial hips, he said. Security hiccups regularly detain him and his family, so he said he'd gladly submit to the scans if they allowed him to forgo the hassle of multiple trips through metal detectors and time-consuming pat-downs.

    Kara and Tom Untied, visitors from Florida, recalled one airport encounter that saw their daughter singled out at a security checkpoint for extensive screening.

    "She was standing there with her arms out, and she had tears in her eyes," Kara Untied said. "She was horrified. I would much rather do this (body-scanning). It would save time in the long run, because they'll be able to see everybody, and there won't be the hassle of waiting for everybody to empty their pockets."

    Tom Untied added that he's seen airport security staffers send flyers through metal detectors four and five times after inconclusive tests, and he'd welcome the new scanners "if they cut all that out."

    Saving time is important at McCarran because the airport could reach capacity of 53 million passengers per year before 2018, the earliest a new airport could be operational.

    That has Clark County Department of Aviation officials working to maximize McCarran's efficiency. The area where the body scanner is to be installed will be home to 12 new security lanes for passengers heading into the C gates. In addition to providing C gate passengers more direct access from the ticket counters to their gates, the new checkpoints will free up more space for D gate passengers at the existing C and D gate checkpoints. The new capacity there will come in handy because airport workers are also in the process of adding nine new D gates.

    Even with domestic airlines cutting back, Clark County Director of Aviation Randall Walker says the need to stretch facilities at McCarran remains.

    In a recent interview, Walker said cutbacks are likely to be temporary, like the economic slumps Las Vegas endured in the 1980s, late 1990s and in the wake of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

    As the economy rebounds, McCarran will need to remain as efficient as possible to keep up with demand until the proposed new airport is ready.

    Officials at the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority didn't comment by press time on whether they were concerned the machines might turn off visitors to the city. But anecdotal evidence shows the scanners won't translate into fewer visitors coming through McCarran.

    Stephen Grosso, a Utah resident who visits his mother-in-law here two to three times a year, said he considers airport screening in general an invasion of his privacy, and he only submits to it when forced. Still, the new devices won't affect whether he flies.

    "If they really felt it was justified for security, I don't have a personal problem with it," Grosso said.

    Stan Tew's friend, an Alabama resident who wouldn't give his name, said the machines would hurt McCarran's traffic if McCarran were the only airport deploying the devices. With other airports using the machines, though, McCarran will probably suffer less fallout. He also said he suspects the scanning technology will encourage more Americans to sign up for programs such as the TSA's registered-traveler program, which lets flyers who get background checks and pay $100 a year avoid some of the heavier screening of conventional checkpoints.

    Tew himself will settle for the standard route through security, and he'll surrender to the body scanner if asked.

    "It doesn't bother me," he said, "but I'm a show-off."

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.Writer Benjamin Spillman contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Tone wrote on June 16, 2008 05:48 PM: Bunch BS if ya' ask me. Just another placebo for the sheep of the good ol' USA, and another dollar into the pockets of the technology companies.


    Buba wrote on June 11, 2008 05:33 PM: Have these machines passed all the Environmental Impact, FDA, and countless other test?

    Do they effect endangered cooties? cause hair loss, weaken bones, skin cancer, count the money in your wallet, record your credit card numbers?

    Traveling has always been a risky venture.

    BUYER BEWARE -- of simulated snakeoils.


    Nancy wrote on June 11, 2008 02:54 PM: What the heck does "appaualled" mean? I, for one, am appalled. I am not willing to sacrifice liberty for security - go read Ben Franklin please.


    mc wrote on June 11, 2008 01:22 PM: Any and all security should be appaualled be all the traveling public.Not complained about invading their privacy, or being embarrased and getting teary eyed over it. There is a reason that the goverment is trying to give the public the security,and for the people who so ignorant to remember that it is the terrorist,[duh 9/11].Not because the goverment and it's employee get a kick out of patting you down, or taking you things, no it's for your and everyone else's safty,try to remember that!


    duh wrote on June 11, 2008 01:17 PM: "we're here from the government and we're here to help you"


    Too Fat wrote on June 11, 2008 12:27 PM: WOW!! I better diet before I fly.


    jim wrote on June 11, 2008 11:33 AM: Who do you know that goes to those pools? And if they do take off their tops, they do it VOLUNTARILY.


    Modesty wrote on June 11, 2008 11:22 AM: Funny that people get their grannie panties all in a bunch over what could possibly save their lives, yet they go to "European" style pools and take their tops off for the whole world to see.


    Jeff wrote on June 11, 2008 10:47 AM: Yet another layer of worthless so called security. People hijack airplanes, not things. Be like ELAL and look for the people and profile ME males for crying out loud. Forget about groping young blondes.


    Nancy wrote on June 11, 2008 09:47 AM: VOTE DEMOCRAT - TAKE BACK AMERICA - this bunch of paranoid lunatics we have running the Country is going to destroy it. They are stealing liberty an inch at a time. America is ever so quickly turning into a police state with Bush/Cheney/McBush et al telling us it is for our own good and for our own safety - what a crock! VOTE PEOPLE, PLEASE.


    Read All Comments