Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News


Strategies for cutting costs detailed at regents' meeting

RENO -- Elimination of faculty, employee furloughs, further student fee increases and enrollment caps are all potential solutions to cutting $96 million out of the higher education budget, regents were told Thursday.

Closing campuses, increasing faculty workloads and limiting hours of operation at the Nevada System of Higher Education institutions are also a possibility, said Dan Klaich, executive vice chancellor.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • ANOTHER SOMBER DAY: Fourth officer in short span dies




  • These different "tools in the toolbox" might all have to come up for consideration by the Board of Regents if the higher education system is forced to cut its 2009-11 budget by 14 percent as requested by Gov. Jim Gibbons, he said.

    "All of these are subjects that could come up over a period of time," Klaich said. "We don't look forward to that discussion at all."

    The ramifications of such budget cuts, which Chancellor Jim Rogers has described as crippling to higher education, were discussed by the board, but no immediate steps were taken to implement any reductions.

    The discussion came the same day as Gibbons sat down with lawmakers and other officials to address the state's budget crisis, which he has called the state's worst ever.

    The discussion also came at the same time the Board of Regents adopted a budget for the next two years that does not include any of the sought-after spending reductions.

    Regents Chairman Michael Wixom said he wanted the original budget approved and in place to use for comparison purposes if the 14 percent cuts become reality.

    Klaich said that campus presidents are moving forward with a review of possible cuts, even as the unaltered budget won approval from the board.

    One of those potential cuts involves issuing notices of non-renewal to faculty warning them that they might not have jobs come July 1, 2009, he said.

    Such notices should be sent out far enough ahead of time to give targeted faculty fair warning of their employment status, Klaich said.

    Rogers said the higher education system is operating with limited information.

    "We're sitting here with very little information that is specific," he said. "It's very premature at this point to sit down and draw up what the game plan is going to be."

    Regent Ron Knecht said the board might want to consider an endorsement of a plan offered by Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki to use the state's annual tobacco settlement payments to generate up to $775 million in bonds to help keep the state solvent.

    Wixom, who attended the budget meeting with Gibbons and lawmakers prior to the regents meeting, said the Krolicki plan is worth exploring, as long as the Governor Guinn Millennium Scholarship for academically qualified Nevada high school graduates is protected. Most of the annual payments to Nevada from the big tobacco companies are now used to pay for the scholarship program, initiated by former Gov. Kenny Guinn and the Legislature in 1999.

    Gibbons has asked state agencies as well as higher education and public education to prepare spending plans for the next two-year budget that are as much as 14 percent lower than current funding levels because of lagging tax revenues.

    That equates to about $500 million less a year in total for the new budget that will begin on July 1, 2009. The current two-year budget, already approved by the Legislature in 2007 before the economy worsened, ends June 30, 2009.

    For the Nevada System of Higher Education, the cut would mean a reduction from the $684 million in general funds allocated to it for fiscal year 2008-09, which begins July 1, of nearly $97 million in each year of the new budget.

    The Gibbons administration says the request for the reduced budgets are for planning purposes and not a certainty at this point.

    The cuts sought by Gibbons would establish a baseline budget of about $3.2 billion a year to which additional revenues could be added to cover growth in student populations, Medicaid and other caseloads.

    The next budget will likely total about $7 billion over two years.

    So even with the slowing revenues and cuts sought by Gibbons, the new 2009-11 budget is expected to reflect an overall increase in spending from the current budget when it sees final approval by the Legislature sometime in June 2008. Spending over the current budget as approved by the Legislature last year should increase by at least 3 percent.

    But this is small consolation to the Board of Regents.

    Regent Cedric Crear said Gibbons is not to blame for the state's economic troubles, but he has failed to show any leadership on how to deal with the crisis. The only reaction from Gibbons is to cut, he said.

    "We have to take drastic action," Crear said.

    Students and faculty need to let their views be known, he said.

    Knecht disagreed that Gibbons is failing to show leadership. Nevada families are facing the same cutbacks as the higher education system, he said.

    A tax increase on families in the current crisis would be "callous," Knecht said.

    Wixom said he will work with Rogers in the coming months to propose some solutions to the budget dilemma in an effort to avoid major disruptions to higher education.

    But tax revenues are not likely to turn positive anytime soon, he said.

    "The issue is preserving ourselves, enhancing ourselves," Wixom said. "This is dangerous stuff. It's not like we're dealing with a luxury that we can simply do without. We're dealing with a necessity in terms of what we can do for our children and what we can do for the state."

    Contact Capital Bureau reporter Sean Whaley at swhaley@reviewjournal.com or 774-687-3900.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Genius wrote on June 13, 2008 05:24 PM: "Elimination of faculty, employee furloughs, further student fee increases and enrollment caps... Closing campuses, increasing faculty workloads and limiting hours of operation..."

    Gee, what is MISSING out of this mix? How about chopping out the dead wood at the top.. you know the deadbeats making well above $100,000/yr off the taxpayers' backs. We truly do have a bunch of monkeys running the BOR.


    Taxpaying Student wrote on June 13, 2008 10:42 AM: What ever happened to "ZERO-BASED BUDGETING"? Go back and justify the need for every person and item that costs over $100,000 per year! And, I mean "justify" not just because we have always done it that way or we would be able to continue without it. How much is the AC bill going to be in the new Engineering Building at UNLV, with its gigantic windows facing the desert sun in the south? Cawmon smarties! You are to teach us the way of improved living. Who is educating whom?


    Not so silent observer wrote on June 13, 2008 09:38 AM: It is time for universities to consider alternative approaches to budgeting. Fee/tuition increases should be proposed annually to cover conservative cost increases in providing education. If the states have the funds to offset some or all of those increases, fine. If not, then the universities can go forward with proposed increases AND students/parents will be able to plan/budget in advance.


    br wrote on June 13, 2008 06:26 AM: Rogers is not the problem. The fault is with a bloated staffing of overpaid, underworked personnel. That includes professors who do not teach and administrators with fuzzy fields to administer. Student enrollment and retention are down as tuition and fees are being pushed up. No more money in the educrats feeding trough. Let them feel our pain.


    b wrote on June 13, 2008 05:55 AM: Get rid of Jim Rogers and can probably cut expenses in half