Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


Porter, Titus in close contest

Most in district rank incumbent fair, poor



Graphic by Mike Johnson.

In the first poll pitting him against his likely general election opponent, Rep. Jon Porter is locked in a tight race with state Sen. Dina Titus to retain his seat in Congress.

Porter, a Republican, had the support of 45 percent of likely voters in the 3rd Congressional District in the survey, versus 42 percent who said they would vote for Titus, a Democrat, if the election were held today.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Police ask: Are there others?
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas



  • Another 13 percent of the 232 likely voters surveyed were undecided. The poll, conducted for the Review-Journal by Washington, D.C.-based Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc., carries a margin of error of plus or minus 6.6 percentage points.

    "The numbers clearly suggest it's a competitive seat. I'd say Porter is at a disadvantage," Mason-Dixon managing partner Brad Coker said of the poll results.

    The race for Porter's seat is expected to be one of the most competitive in the nation in November.

    A former Boulder City councilman and mayor and former state senator, Porter, 53, is seeking a fourth term in the House of Representatives. Titus, 58, a University of Nevada, Las Vegas political science professor and the leader of the Democratic minority in the state Senate, was the unsuccessful Democratic nominee for governor in 2006.

    The district had historically been about evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans, but Democrats in recent months have built an advantage of more than 20,000 registered voters -- about 6 percent of the electorate.

    Although the poll puts Porter a few points ahead, he shouldn't feel comfortable, Coker said.

    "He's under 50 (percent). Even though he's ahead, that's a big warning sign," he said. "He's vulnerable, without question. He won by the skin of his teeth last time, and now he's running in an even harsher anti-Republican environment. That's going to be a tough fight for Porter."

    Also spelling trouble for Porter in the poll was his constituents' view of his performance rating. Just 36 percent thought he was doing an excellent or good job, while 56 percent rated his performance fair or poor.

    That was the worst performance rating in Nevada's five-member congressional delegation, worse than Sen. Harry Reid (43 percent excellent or good), Rep. Dean Heller (52 percent), Sen. John Ensign (56 percent) or Rep. Shelley Berkley (61 percent).

    The poll found that though men favored Porter, 53 percent to Titus' 34 percent, women favored Titus, 50 percent to 37 percent.

    Porter and Titus each won 76 percent of the vote from their respective parties, but while Porter won 16 percent of Democrats, Titus had the support of just 6 percent of Republicans. A large portion of Republicans, 18 percent, were undecided.

    Porter also prevailed among independents, earning 51 percent to Titus' 36 percent, while 13 percent remained unsure who they would vote for. Coker said that would be the crucial vote in the election.

    "The independent vote is where it's going to be won and lost," he said. "That's how Porter has won it the last couple of times. In this kind of anti-incumbent, anti-Congress, anti-Republican environment, that might be harder than usual for him."

    A Porter spokesman said it was impressive that Porter was running as close as he was to Titus in the poll, considering the circumstances.

    "These numbers speak to the competitiveness and the demographics that define Nevada's 3rd Congressional District," Matt Leffingwell said. He noted that the poll was conducted "in the wake of a massive surge in Democratic voter registration and unprecedented enthusiasm for the Democrats' caucus in Nevada."

    A spokeswoman for Titus' campaign found the poll numbers encouraging.

    "These are incredible numbers. They show the depth of Dina's strength in the district," Kirsten Searer of the state Democratic Party said. "She launched her campaign for Congress just six weeks ago and already has established one of the most competitive congressional campaigns in the country."

    Searer predicted that Titus' share of the vote would only increase over the course of the campaign as the district is targeted by national Democrats, the presidential race and state legislative races.

    Porter and Titus still must both be nominated by their respective parties in the Aug. 12 primary.

    Porter faces two other Republicans, Carl Bunce and Jesse Law, in his quest for the nomination. Titus is up against fellow Democrats Barry Michaels, Anna Nevenic and Carlo "Tex" Poliak.

    The general election will also be contested by an Independent American Party candidate, Floyd Fitzgibbons; Green Party candidate Bob Giaquinta; independent candidate Jeffrey C. Reeves, and Libertarian Party candidate Joseph P. Silvestri.

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.



    Leave Your Comment 12 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Wakeup wrote on June 24, 2008 03:57 PM: When a Republican wants to pick on a Democratic they yell, taxes, taxes, taxes. What pawns some middle class Republicans have become. In case your not aware, taxes pay for the greatest military in the world. A few more taxes paid by the top wage earners in America would pay for a great health care system. Unlike today's system which is the best the world for the rich. just ask people like Gov Guinn who traveled to California for treatment. If you got cancer were are you going? My guess is most American's cannot afford to travel and pay and stay at UCLA Medical Center.


    Joe wrote on June 15, 2008 03:48 PM: Cynthia Baker- you remind me of a lemming getting ready to head over a cliff. "Dina Taxes"-- give me a break. She was the leader of the MINORITY party in the state senate under a republican governor, so how the hell do you claim she is "Dina Taxes" when she had no power to do so?

    The Republican Corporate Incumbent Lapdog Supporters Machine is going to have do better than "Dina Taxes".

    As for Helen, well, we all know that will be wasted vote! I hope your paultard is as adamantly racist as you have been in these columns.

    Cheers.

    Joe B.


    bruce wrote on June 14, 2008 06:43 PM: It looks like Molly and the RJ are bashing Poter like thay did with Gibbins.it seems the public doesn't pay much attention to what you print.after writing hundreds,mayby thousands negitave articals about Gibbins and he still won.how much would he have won by if you would't have told all those lies about him.it looks like you are doing the samething with Poter


    Chris wrote on June 14, 2008 02:00 PM: Please oh please be smart enough NOT to send Dina the dimwit to Washington.


    joe wrote on June 14, 2008 01:16 PM: Don't worry Porter, once you tell everyone you're a Mormon then all the Mormons will vote for you simply because you're Mormon, and you'll win by a landslide.


    Greg McFarlane wrote on June 14, 2008 11:05 AM: The subhead, I mean.


    Greg McFarlane wrote on June 14, 2008 11:03 AM: The unflattering headline, while technically correct, is pretty misleading when you compare it with the chart. At least I guess no one can accuse the R-J of being an apologist for the Republican Party.


    Helen Weils wrote on June 14, 2008 10:22 AM: I'm voting for Carl Bunce, the Ron Paul Republican in the primary.


    nuevo americano wrote on June 14, 2008 10:05 AM: Hey Molly why did the poll for Reid connect fair and poor and this poll separate the two. A bit bias against Reid are we?


    nuevo americano wrote on June 14, 2008 10:01 AM: Bye Bye Porter.Goodbye by Bush Porter. keep selling insurance and denying benefits when people need the insurance coverage.


    Read All Comments