Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


Sealing lawsuit hid allegations that judge's law firm didn't perform its duties







About the time Family Court Judge Stefany Miley was sworn in three years ago, a widow sued the judge and her law partners for malpractice and the lawsuit was one of a handful hidden from the public.

Now, as Miley seeks higher office, the District Court judge who presided over the malpractice case said last week that he sealed it by mistake and plans to unseal the lawsuit unless attorneys can convince him to do otherwise.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • Judge Doug Herndon said he didn't realize he had sealed the case in error until the Review-Journal inquired about it, and that he plans to call the attorneys on the Miley case back into court to justify the sealing of the case.

    Herndon explained that the lawsuit was settled before he held any hearings, that he wasn't familiar with the case as a result and that when he signed the dismissal order -- one of dozens he said he signs each week -- he didn't realize the order included a request to permanently seal the case.

    "I would have never known about the case until I was asked to dismiss it. ... I have never sealed a case, but I apparently signed off on it," Herndon said.

    The case was settled more than two years ago, but limited records from that case -- and dozens of other sealed lawsuits -- are available for the first time on the Clark County District Court's Web site.

    Previously, virtually no information was available on sealed lawsuits. Review-Journal stories last year prompted the state Supreme Court in January to enact rules to limit sealed cases, but the rules don't affect cases sealed years earlier.

    Also, in response to the Review-Journal stories suggesting that court personnel may have sealed more documents than the presiding judges ordered, courthouse administrators earlier this year started to either unseal or "properly seal" sealed lawsuits, using computer software that wasn't available until last year.

    As a result, some information from about 69 sealed cases is available for the first time, and clerks plan to provide in the months ahead more information on approximately 229 additional sealed lawsuit dating back to the early 1990s, court administrators said.

    Dates, motions, secondary litigants and their aliases, whether settlements were reached, the names of judges and attorneys, and other information, are now available for properly sealed lawsuits.

    Since the Miley case was properly sealed, such information has become available online for that lawsuit.

    The order sealing the file of case documents still stood last week, but court personnel, through an apparent misunderstanding, showed that file to the Review-Journal. The file included the complaint against the law firm, its vague response to the complaint, and a handful of other documents filed before an out-of-court settlement was reached.

    The complaint shows that Miley, a first-term Family Court judge who is in a contested campaign to replace District Court Judge Elizabeth Halverson, and her law firm were sued by Valerie Carr-Blum of Las Vegas just days after Miley took the bench in January 2005.

    The lawsuit, which was quickly sealed from public view, alleged that Carr-Blum's husband, at the time of his impending death, signed legal documents to keep the couple's home out of probate, but that the law firm didn't file the records at the courthouse before he died, as required for Carr-Blum to assume sole ownership of the house.

    The man died five days after he signed the documents in the presence of the law firm's paralegal, according to court records.

    Kate Kruse, a law professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who teaches professional ethics, said that for a lawyer to miss a deadline at court, resulting in a client being hurt, is a "pretty serious oversight."

    In a situation like the Miley case, it's possible the law firm had no way of knowing when its client would die and, therefore, had no idea that its deadline was imminent, Kruse said.

    If the probate documents were ready to file at the courthouse after Blum signed them, "best practice" would have been to file the documents as soon as possible, Kruse said.

    "If everything was all done, you have to wonder why it wasn't filed? Does the law firm not have consistent procedures in place to get these things done?" Kruse said. "They may have thought they had more time than they did. They should have gotten it filed before the husband died; but they wouldn't know when that would be, so it's a judgement call."

    The law firm reached a settlement with Carr-Blum about a year after the lawsuit was filed, and asked in writing that Herndon permanently seal the case.

    Herndon said he signed the dismissal notice without realizing it included a request to seal.

    Carr-Blum couldn't be reached for comment.

    Miley said last week that she couldn't recall details of the lawsuit and, therefore, declined to discuss it.

    Miley said she thought the lawsuit had been unsealed recently, and suggested the Review-Journal go to the courthouse and look at the case for more information about it.

    "I haven't looked at the case in years. To answer your questions with any specificity, I would have to read the case."

    She was mistaken. As of Friday afternoon, the case remained sealed from public view, according to court records.

    Miley said she also could not recall whether the Miley Law Firm or Carr-Blum wanted the lawsuit sealed.

    "I couldn't even respond to that. ... I let the lawyers handle everything," she said.

    As a candidate for District Court, Miley said she believes judges should follow state law when considering whether to seal a lawsuit.

    "The law is what the law is, and that is made by the Legislature," she said.

    However, with regard to the new rules for sealing lawsuits, the judge is mistaken. The rules were enacted by the state Supreme Court after members of the state Senate Judiciary Committee -- Committee Chairman Mark Amodei, R-Carson City; Sen. Mike McGinness, R-Fallon; Sen. Dennis Nolan, R-Las Vegas; and Sen. Maurice Washington, R-Sparks -- last year killed a bill that would have limited judges' authority to seal civil cases.

    Contact reporter Frank Geary at fgeary@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0277.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 46 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    undr cvr wrote on June 23, 2008 05:48 PM: Hardcastle was the spokesperson for the Eighth District closing the doors to the public and media on meetings concerning the breaking scandal with public defender problems back in 2003-2005.
    Thom Mitchell, Gary Peck and others tried to overcome the bar to no real avail and the problems with indigent defense and Kathy Hardcastle still exist.
    It amazing how many federal crimes are involved when you really do some homework.
    Pure corruption.


    Just Watchin wrote on June 23, 2008 05:02 PM: endrun, I agree wholeheartedly.
    It makes sense. Remember when Harcastle first had her fit about Halverson? Harcastle staged a big to do, sent Halverson to "judge school". The timing was not random. Immediately, Hardcastle rotated all of Halversons cases. The excuse was to move the criminal cases to someone with more experience. No surprise to some. There were dirty cases still hanging around from those climbing the corporate ladder.


    undr cvr wrote on June 23, 2008 04:57 PM: Well, I didnt mean to get caught!!!!

    People arent felons until they get busted, or in some cases, set up!


    endrun wrote on June 23, 2008 03:48 PM: Just remember November is coming.

    Also, regarding Cherry's cases, whether random or whatever, Herndon has some from Cherry that he himself were involved in as a DA of which are being investigated.

    Maybe just a coinky dink, maybe not.

    Nevertheless we have all heard the 'he didn't realize he'..... excuse from public officials over and over again just before the fall.

    ...'I didnt see the speed limit was only 25...'

    This could turn out to be much more significant than it seems on the surface folks because where's there's smoke there is fire and where there is more than one public official involved in an 'oops' like this there is probable cause to believe there is an element of corruption.


    helenk wrote on June 23, 2008 11:11 AM: Herdon did not remember or realize he was signing a to seal a case for another judge. LOL... he really expects the public to believe him?

    If so, what is his competency. What else has he signed that he does not know of.

    Miley is as crooked as they come. Her and her husband have represented some very shady clients not to mention Miley received campaign contribitions from some interesting folks.

    It is clear why Halverson is being ousted. Miley makes the perfect judge for the Nevada courts system. She looks the part. She is crooked like the rest of the judges. She can be controlled and bought.She is used to doing slimy things with slimy people and pretending she does not. She really is perfect.

    This truly is the type of woman Hardcastle and the boys of the supreme court want in their circle.

    Dirty,crooked, yet, will smile in your face, look good in a suit.




    Tell it like it is wrote on June 23, 2008 08:28 AM: Can anyone confirm that Stefany Miley failed the 1995 Nevada Bar exam?


    Frivolous Lawsuit??? wrote on June 22, 2008 11:44 PM: Jack, I could NOT agree with you more. These idiot professor is too quick to nail an actual lawyer in practice. It is not that easy to satisfy and please every client 100%. This case demonstrates that. For clients to then turn around and sue the lawyer is sad. There are many comments by crazies who simply get off on lawyer and judge bashing. I will bet this lawsuit is over-rated!! LOL. Can anyone tell me otherwise??????????? What are the ACTUAL DAMAGES???


    Jack wrote on June 22, 2008 11:15 PM: Kate Kruse, a law professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who teaches professional ethics, said that for a lawyer to miss a deadline at court, resulting in a client being hurt, is a "pretty serious oversight."
    Law professor at UNLV huh?...In other words a teacher. Her vast experience in courts, cough cough, must have led her to make this very broad blanket statement.


    STIPULATION wrote on June 22, 2008 07:52 PM: Let's not assume the widow is some innocent, peaceful saint. I have my doubts. I'd like to know what her damages, if any, really were. many comments on here are so scathing. Some seem to take pride on lawywer or judge bashing. Court records shows the sealing of this case was done by STIPULATION (meaning the plaintiff agreed to seal it through her lawywer!) So before all you crazies keep going crazy, take a sane breath, and let's see why the lawsuit had to be filed and what the actual damages were, if any. I am still waiting for someone to specify what the damages were. I bet someone knows but too embarrassd


    Point to Ponder wrote on June 22, 2008 07:14 PM: Why did Family Court Judge Stefany Miley take campaign contributions for her Family Court seat from RICBAR a Rizzolo Limited Liability Co?

    Is Miley going to follow in Saitta's foot steps? Rizzolo for a buddy, sealed cases, has Miley legislated from the bench yet or, does Saitta still have one up on her?


    Read All Comments