Web Site Analytics
Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Obama touts 'green' energy on visit to Springs Preserve




Under the bleach-bright Las Vegas summer sun, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Tuesday checked out the solar panels that shade cars in the parking lot of the Springs Preserve while powering the facility.

"What we are seeing here ... is that the green, renewable energy economy is not some far-off, pie-in-the-sky future," Obama said in a speech at the local nature attraction. "It is now. It's creating jobs now. It is providing cheap alternatives to $140-a-barrel oil now. And it can create millions of additional jobs, entire industries, if we act now."


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Details emerge in Jackson probe
  • NORM: When live news shots turn bad
  • NORM: Lance Burton renews contract
  • Motorcyclist killed in collision with CAT bus
  • Motorcyclist killed in crash on Blue Diamond
  • Clark County man dies of H1N1 virus
  • NORM: Jackson changes Las Vegas address
  • Motorcyclist killed in crash with SUV at Durango and Sahara
  • OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING: Police account is disputed
  • Interstate 15 projects pile up




  • In his first visit to Nevada since becoming the Democrats' presumptive nominee, Obama visited Las Vegas to put forward his energy plan Tuesday morning. The energy issue has become the focal point of the candidates' recent sparring as it hits Americans in the pocketbook in the form of skyrocketing gasoline prices.

    Obama proposed long-term investments in renewable energy as the solution and said "green" jobs like those at the Springs Preserve could provide work to locals suffering from the construction slowdown. He criticized Republican opponent John McCain's proposals as politically oriented ploys that wouldn't really address the problem.

    The Illinois senator said he wouldn't rule out expanding nuclear power, but he would first require an acceptable way of dealing with the radioactive waste that results.

    Obama opposes the proposed nuclear waste repository at Nevada's Yucca Mountain, and he used the local issue to slam McCain.

    "He wants to build 45 new nuclear reactors when they don't have a plan to store the waste anywhere besides right here," he said.

    The federal government, Obama said, should provide incentives for the development of wind, solar and other types of renewable energy.

    "But Washington hasn't done that," he said. "What Washington has done is what Washington always does: peddled cheap gimmicks that get politicians through to the next election."

    McCain has proposed a $300 million prize for development of battery technology for cars, an idea Obama ridiculed.

    "When John F. Kennedy decided that we were going to put a man on the moon, he didn't put a bounty up for some rocket scientist to win," he said. "He put the full resources of the United States government behind the project and called on the ingenuity of the American people."

    Obama was also critical of McCain's proposals for a summer holiday from the federal gasoline tax and allowing offshore oil drilling. He noted that McCain had admitted that drilling off America's coasts would have only a "psychological impact" in the immediate term.

    "In case you were wondering, in Washington-speak, what that means is, 'It polls well,'" Obama said. "It's an example of how Washington tries to convince you that they've done something to make your life better when they really didn't."

    Oil companies, he said, already have drilling rights to millions of acres of federal land, "and yet they haven't touched it," Obama said. "John McCain wants to give them more when they're not using what they already have."

    The companies ought to pay a fine on drilling rights they're holding but not using, he said.

    In the case of the gasoline -tax holiday, he said that when he supported such a measure in Illinois, oil companies simply pocketed the money to pad their profit margins rather than passing on the savings to consumers.

    "These are not serious energy policies," Obama said. "I wish we could wave a magic wand and make gas prices go down, but we can't."

    In the near term, Obama proposed a second round of stimulus checks to families and a tax cut for workers to help people deal with rising costs. To help pay for it, he called for a tax on oil companies' profits and closing the "Enron loophole" that allows speculators to drive up oil prices.

    Over 10 years, Obama said he would devote $150 billion to alternative energy sources, which he said would create "up to five million new jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced."

    Republicans responded to Obama's attacks on their candidate by calling him "the Dr. No of energy policy."

    Obama has put forward just one concrete proposal on energy, the stimulus checks combined with taxing oil profits, Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., said in a conference call with reporters. Meanwhile, he has opposed McCain's many proposals: the gas tax holiday, offshore drilling, more nuclear power and the $300 million prize.

    "I am not sure he has done anything other than mirror the inaction of the Democrat majority in the Congress," Burr said.

    McCain's economic adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, defended the concept of offshore drilling's "psychological impact." Futures markets, he said, would respond to the prospect of increased drilling capacity by lowering oil prices right away.

    "If the United States makes a strong commitment to additional exploration ... that sends a strong signal to the traders in the market that future supplies will be greater," he said.

    After his 14-minute speech, Obama took questions from the audience of about 50 energy workers and conservationists seated in the small conference room at the preserve, which was built to national green building standards of energy efficiency and with sustainable materials.

    Local electrician Eddie Gering, 48, thanked Obama for opposing the gasoline-tax holiday, saying he felt the proposal insulted his intelligence as a voter. He wanted to know why nuclear power shouldn't be a bigger part of the nation's energy future.

    "The problem that we've got with nuclear energy right now is that we have not figured out how to store the waste in a safe and effective manner," Obama said. "That's why Yucca is such a big issue here in Nevada. The basic theory was, we won't solve the problem, we'll just dump it all in Nevada."

    He said he would increase investment in research and development to find a better way to store nuclear material.

    "If we can figure that out, then nuclear has some big advantages, the fact that it doesn't produce greenhouse gases being the most important one," he said.

    To another question, about government red tape preventing new energy projects from getting off the ground, Obama became philosophical.

    "I'm a Democrat, and at times in the past Democrats have gotten so regulation-happy they lose sight of efficiency," he said. "Republicans attack us as wanting government for the sake of government. I want enough government to do what needs to be done, but I also want government to get out of the way where it's blocking progress. I want to streamline government so it's working. I want it to be consumer-friendly."

    While he was in town, Obama met briefly with a local family to talk about how his tax plan would affect them, according to the campaign.

    Later Tuesday in Los Angeles, Obama raised nearly $5 million at a celebrity-packed fundraiser that was the equivalent of the entertainment industry's coming-out party for the likely Democratic presidential nominee.

    "He's my candidate, and I think you have to put your money where your mouth is," said actor Don Cheadle. Actor Dennis Quaid said Obama is "the Superman for everyone."

    Obama's campaign refused to say how many millions he and the Democratic National Committee raised at the gala, but Democratic officials put the number at close to $5 million. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the numbers publicly.

    Campaign officials severely limited media access to the event at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. No television cameras or photographers were allowed inside.

    Obama, who is counting on Hollywood's reliable support for Democrats, appealed to the those in the crowd who might have supported his former foe, Hillary Clinton.

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 53 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    James P Gengler wrote on July 06, 2008 04:58 PM: I would like to know more about the current shortcomings in our ability to store nuclear waste. I am infuriated by the fact that 85% of American coast line is off limits to American oil companies yet China can come and drill in between us and Cuba and extract from deposits that reach well under US soil. My other hot button is the inability of Federal Government to exercise fiscal responsibility. After 2 Bushes and a Reagan we have impoverished ourselves with trillions of $ of debt.
    The Republicans borrow and spend abroad. The Democrats will borrow but spend more focused on domestic programs. neither form of out of control government is attractive to a voter who yearns to return to the Clinton days of surplus budgets


    Horacio Cambeiro wrote on July 05, 2008 06:10 PM: That's the future I know we can have. That's the America I believe in. And that's where I will lead us if I have the chance to serve as your President. It will not be easy. It will not happen overnight. It will not come without cost or sacrifice. But it is possible. It is necessary. And places like this, and people like you, prove that we have the resources, and the skills, and the will to begin today. I look forward to joining you in that effort. Thank you.

    Horacio Cambeiro.


    Edgar Welty wrote on June 28, 2008 04:46 PM: Relief for High Gas Prices

    Here are ideas for the immediate, intermediate and indefinite future.

    Immediate:
    During commuting hours, in many regions of America, streets and freeways are clogged with automobiles transporting one person each. If we can facilitate ride sharing and bring the average ratio of person per car during commutes from 1.1 to 2.2 or 3.3, we can use our existing transportation system more efficiently. Commuters can save gasoline. Employers can save on parking costs. Through the power of the Internet, which the Obama Campaign is known to understand, a nation–wide effort to regionally coordinate car-pooling can be started immediately.

    Intermediate:
    Detailed data of who commutes where and when will aid planning for and the promotion of mass transit. Somewhat immediate relief of pump price pressure could come from more effective use of existing mass transit. Another somewhat- intermediate time frame approach to relieve pressure on gas prices would be a crash program to insulate homes. Saved heating fuel could be refined as gasoline.

    Indefinite:
    There are many approaches for the long term. The American public can and will buy automobiles which get many miles per gallon. However, how long it will take to replace America’s fleet of private vehicles is unknown. Oil companies, which use resources to drill for domestic oil in fields already available for their use, could be exempted from a windfall profits tax. New fuels, particularly since we have seen drawbacks to the use of corn (i.e. effects on food costs), hold promise but will take time. The same holds true for electric cars. Also, over time, we can reconstruct our urban areas so that more people live closer to work. Finally alternative energy can be developed and expanded.


    Dave wrote on June 27, 2008 12:00 PM: Travis,

    After 10 years overseas in the Army, I've seen the results of socialism, seen the results of leaders long on promises and short on results, a visit to the concentration camp in Germany has really made me careful as to who I'll follow.

    Millions followed Hitler as he promised and promised. If his country men would have just looked at where he came from, who he associated with (maybe read his book).

    The first gulf war introduced me to islam. Yes, there are good muslim people, but by and large they would prefer us dead. The "great satin - death to all infidels" is preached daily. To them first comes Saturday (kill the jews) then comes Sunday (kill the christians). If they could there would be another 9/11 today, tomorrow, and everyday after.

    Obama's dad was muslim, his mother re-married a muslim, his entire family (minus his mother and grandmother), are muslim. He went to an islamic grade school which had to be influental.
    Catholics say if we have them until their 9 we have them for life.

    Obama's support of his cousin Raila Odinga in Kenya who wishes to re-write the constitution of Kenya to adopt Shariah law and have mandatory madrassas in all primary schools shows his support for islam.

    Imagine the kenyan's women becomming subordinate to their male counterparts.

    This is heavy.

    McCain has issues, but this guy turned down freedom as a POW to uphold a principle. Vets tell me Nam was thick. He put his country's interest a head of his own freedom.

    If it gets ugly I want someone like him in the headshed.

    Is there anything Obama has done?
    Did he serve?
    Who does he follow?
    Who does he support?
    Does he support those who paid in full for his freedom?


    Ronald wrote on June 26, 2008 12:41 PM: Such hard hitting journalism. You and the "minute rice" wouldn't know a good energy policy if it slapped you. Keep on smokin' those CFLs Algore is handin'out. Minute rice won't be quite as charmin'in about 4 years after he has called every white MAN, newspaper journalist and radio commentator a racist.


    Jeff in Orlando wrote on June 26, 2008 06:03 AM: McCain has guts; he goes to Iowa, a corn state, and tells the people corn ethanol isn't a good energy source. He wants to eliminate the domestic ethanol subsidy that we pay billions for, and wants the tariff on imported ethanol dropped. Dr. No (Obama) wants to keep the tariff and the subsidy. What could be good for ordinary Americans is bad for Obama (Illinois produces 4 billion worth of corn) and a lot of well connected politicians in both parties. I applaud Obama's stand on renewables and alternative energy, but where are they? If there are solutions that are available to us in the short term, we need to use them.


    What the Bible Says about Abortion wrote on June 25, 2008 08:21 PM: "Neither the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) nor the Christian Scriptures appear to address abortion directly. However, writings in the early Christian movement by the end of the 1st century or the beginning of the 2nd century CE do condemn abortion.

    "Hebrew Scriptures: Exodus 21:22 is a key passage. As translated in the New International Version, this verse implies that the fetus is a human person. However, the most common interpretation of this same verse, as seen in other translations, implies that the fetus is not a human being. Other passages in the Hebrew Scriptures tend to devalue the fetus.

    "Christian Scriptures: Luke 1:41 might be interpreted to condemn abortions after fetal viability.

    "The Hebrew and Christian Scriptures (Old and New Testament) use the same word to refer to an unborn fetus, newborn or older child. This is a limitation of the Hebrew and Greek languages. It might be interpreted as implying that: both ancient Hebrews and Pagan Greeks considered that the fetus is fully human, equivalent to a newborn child. They simply called both children and potential children by the same term, much as modern-day parents-to-be refer to a fetus as a baby.

    "A case can be made that the 99% of all abortions (those which are performed prior to viability of the fetus) do not appear to be prohibited by Bible passages, as translated by most versions of the Bible."

    http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_biblcon.htm


    The Antifausto wrote on June 25, 2008 08:04 PM: Fausto's favorite Bible verse:
    Psalms 137, verses 8-9:

    "O Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us --he who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks."

    Antifausto's favorite Bible verse:
    Genesis 2, verse 25:

    "And they were naked, and they were not ashamed."


    YES! wrote on June 25, 2008 07:54 PM: Uncle Fausto, tell us again about how you voted for George W. Bush, twice.

    We love that story.


    Fausto wrote on June 25, 2008 07:53 PM: "You have to admit that is a very narrow interpretation."

    No denying abortion is a *secular* value. Narrow? Well, I could go into more....


    Read All Comments