Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


Bill funds wars, expands GI Bill benefits

Legislation includes 13-week extension of jobless payments

WASHINGTON -- The Senate completed action last week on a bill that continues funding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while approving new spending for veterans education, unemployment assistance and flood relief.

The Senate voted 92-6 for the bill's final segment, authorizing $21 billion for domestic spending. The House and Senate earlier had finalized $165.4 billion to support military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Cheetah Girls have claws out
  • NORM: Chef's steak rates No. 1 in magazine
  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGED: Halverson husband arrested
  • NORM: Woods in town for trainer aid
  • Teen's death leaves family devastated
  • NORM: O.J. associate has advertising plans
  • Jewelry theft from Mayweather major LV haul
  • FATAL ARGUMENT: Woman dies after stabbing
  • Jailed criminals reach out to give teens inside look at 'Life of Crime'
  • BOULDER CITY BYPASS: Bridging funding gap



  • The Senate vote allowed the entire package to be sent to President Bush, who has indicated he would sign it into law. Congress and Bush aides had negotiated the bill over the course of weeks.

    The bill contains a major expansion of the GI Bill. It allows veterans serving since Sept. 11, 2001, for a period of 36 months to attend any public university in their home state for four years, plus a housing allowance.

    It offers a 13-week extension of federal unemployment benefits. Also, it postpones six cost-cutting Medicaid regulations that critics said would fray health coverage for the poor and disabled.

    Sens. Harry Reid, D-Nev, and John Ensign, R-Nev., voted for the bill.

    HOUSE APPROVES TAX 'PATCH'

    The House approved a one-year bill to "patch" the alternative minimum tax that otherwise would have raised taxes on more than 20 million individuals this year.

    Lawmakers voted 233-189 for the reprieve from the "alternative minimum tax." Unless Congress adjusts the law, more middle income taxpayers would fall into a special category and be hit with higher levies.

    The vote fell largely along party lines. Most Republicans objected because the tax relief would be financed by $62 billion in tax increases elsewhere, including on oil and gas companies, private equity managers and some foreign owned corporations.

    Supporters said the so-called AMT patch would rescue middle-class taxpayers. Critics said the offsetting tax increases would further stifle the economy and kill jobs.

    Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., voted for the bill. Reps. Jon Porter and Dean Heller, both R-Nev., voted against it.

    MIXED RESULTS ON ENERGY BILLS

    A week before they were to face constituents over the July 4 holiday, lawmakers scrambled to show some progress against high gasoline and energy costs.

    The results were mixed.

    Lawmakers voted 322-98 for a bill that would offer $1.7 billion in grants to communities that expand their public transportation and reduce fares.

    Berkley and Porter voted for the bill. Heller voted against it.

    Another bill that passed by a wide margin directed regulators to toughen oversight of oil futures trading.

    Several other bills fell victim to partisan fighting, as Republicans and Democrats sought to blame each other for high gasoline prices.

    A Democratic "use it or lose it" bill to take away production leases that are not being used by energy companies was defeated.

    The vote was 223-195 in favor of the bill, but Democrats brought it to the floor under a fast-track procedure that blocked Republican amendments but required a two-thirds vote to pass.

    Democrats contended there is no need to open up the nation's coastlines and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling as industry has suggested when leases on about 68 million acres of land and coastal waters are not being exploited.

    Republicans, some Democrats and outside analysts said the bill would do little to encourage more exploration.

    Companies routinely obtain leases on broad swaths of land in hopes that oil and gas might be discovered on some portions, they said.

    Berkley voted for the bill. Heller and Porter voted against it.

    A bill that authorized the Federal Trade Commission to investigate and pursue gasoline price gougers also failed. The vote was 276-146, but again a two-thirds majority was needed.

    Bush came out against the bill, declaring it amounted to price controls.

    Berkley and Heller voted for the bill. Porter voted against it.



    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Proud Marine wrote on June 29, 2008 06:52 PM: When the garbage hits the fan and the war is fought on our soil I don't want to hear Jamie, JD or Liber8tor cry for help.

    I am so glad I fought for our country's freedom for scum like you!

    Enjoy living in the country of the free because of the brave!


    gibillforme wrote on June 29, 2008 11:25 AM: For once i agree with bush on this one. I got out of the military a few years ago and have been useing my gibill the entire time. What bush does not want is guys getting in the army for 3 and done and then getting the full benefits of the "New GI Bill". He just wants to tac on one re-enlistment for another 3 years so that we as taxpayers get a little return on that college education. 3 years of service is just not enough for a full college ride. Disability of course trumps all.


    Liber8tor wrote on June 29, 2008 11:11 AM: Shame in our CONgress for giving the little tin-horn dictator George "The Weasel" Bush everything he wanted to ruin the world. They gave Smirkboy $162 Billion (with a B) to flush down the toilet in Iraq and they found time to give Mexico $400 Million for the "Drug War". Meantime, our roads and bridges are falling apart and Hoeless Vets are sleeping in doorways. This country IS ON THE WRONG PATH!


    JD wrote on June 29, 2008 10:11 AM: The hypocrisy of the new GI-Bill confounds me. If GWB is so very pro-military, then why is he against the new GI-Bill? Better benefits = better people in the armed forces = better decisions on the front lines. If you support our armed forces then you support the changes to the GI-Bill!


    Jamie wrote on June 29, 2008 07:36 AM: Shame on the congress for not standing up to Bush and Cheney's illegal occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and for granting immunity to the telephone companies that broke the law by cooperating with Bush's illegal wiretapping. Wanna know why our economy is kaput? Read that first item again.