Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

News


FAMILY SERVICES: Three visits preceded boy's death

Longtime critics of agency say, 'Nothing has changed'

Jason Rimer was no stranger to Clark County's child welfare agency.

Three times during the disabled boy's four years of life, investigators from the Department of Family Services visited his home to look into abuse or neglect allegations. Each time, the claims were ruled unsubstantiated, and the cases were closed.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • Reid shares Senate ideas
  • NORM: TV journalist fired after ad reported
  • NORM: Wedding upsets Daddy Geldof
  • NORM: Caesars security detains Semel
  • Woman dies in I-15 crash
  • NORM: 40/40 Club buzz may mean a sale
  • No cards ... only computers
  • TRAUMA DEPARTMENT: Doctor challenges UMC
  • GRAND CANYON: Dam fails, scores are evacuated
  • County to open Beltway entrance



  • Sixteen months after the last visit, the boy who could barely walk or speak was dead, forgotten in his family's sport utility vehicle for 17 hours.

    For critics of the county agency, the Rimer case is a glaring example of how those responsible for protecting Southern Nevada's most vulnerable children are failing, despite a wave of reforms following a similar child death in 2005.

    "We've got another dead kid, and nothing has changed," children's advocate Donna Coleman said.

    She compared Jason's death to that of Adacelli Snyder, a 2-year-old with cerebral palsy who died of severe malnourishment in a mobile home infested with lice and littered with animal feces.

    Adacelli's family had been under Family Services' watch for a year before it closed the case. A year later, the girl was dead.

    Her mother and the mother's boyfriend were sentenced to 10 years to life in prison after pleading guilty to second-degree murder by child neglect.

    That case, along with other deaths of children under the agency's watch, helped spark a state review of the troubled agency and led to changes in leadership and policy. But critics said those changes were mostly cosmetic.

    "It's the same old deficiencies, the same old practices," said Bill Grimm, a lawyer leading a federal lawsuit to reform the county agency. "Nothing has changed regarding the protection of children in the county. That's what's disturbing about this."

    Coleman and Grimm shared concerns about the county's handling of the Rimer case.

    The first allegations against the family came in 1988.

    In the next two decades, the county received 21 reports of potential abuse or neglect involving Stanley and Colleen Rimer and their eight children, according to a document Family Services completes in child fatality cases.

    Fourteen of the complaints were investigated and found to be unsubstantiated. A 1988 complaint including physical abuse and medical neglect was substantiated, as was a 1991 complaint involving a lack of supervision.

    The other five complaints were either folded into ongoing investigations or filed as "information only" because the allegations weren't severe enough to warrant investigation, Family Services spokeswoman Christine Skorupski said.

    Five of the 21 complaints came after Jason's birth in March 2004.

    The first came in December 2004 and led to an investigation of possible medical and environmental neglect. Six months later, the investigator closed the case after finding "no evidence to support abuse or neglect," according to the child fatality document.

    "The family complied with all requests for services, and the child was doing well. Therefore, the investigator closed the case," the document said.

    It said two related calls were made within three days of each other in July 2006 involving physical neglect allegations. An investigator who visited the home four weeks later determined "no indication of neglect was observable," and the case was closed.

    Six months later, another pair of complaints were made to Family Services with allegations including physical abuse, domestic violence and sibling sexual abuse.

    The investigator who visited the Rimer home warned the parents about the potential consequences of excessive physical discipline and told the children they could talk to school employees about their problems at home, the document said.

    The investigators closed the case, finding the allegations unsubstantiated.

    "The little boy is dead. Is that substantiated enough for you?" Coleman said.

    Jason was disabled with myotonic dystrophy, a genetic disorder that attacks muscles and other body systems and hinders brain development in children. Jason had been walking for only six months and functioned at a 2-year-old level.

    Las Vegas police arrested his parents Wednesday on charges of second-degree murder and child abuse and neglect. The couple's four minor children remained in protective custody at Child Haven, where they were taken after police discovered they were living in a filthy, cluttered house.

    Grimm, of the National Center for Youth Law in Oakland, Calif., said the Rimer case highlights an ongoing problem with the county's child welfare investigators.

    "This case ... and others we've reviewed illustrate that there are many, many staff at the Department of Family Services who don't know, in fact don't have a clue, how to do an effective child neglect investigation," Grimm said.

    Many investigators are too willing to take caregivers' stories at face value and don't dig deeper into allegations, he said. For example, they might interview children in front of their parents or not talk to neighbors, teachers and others about allegations, he said.

    Child welfare investigators need to approach cases more like police, who are trained to look beyond the surface for evidence, he said.

    If any family required a harder look, it was the Rimers and their extensive history of complaints, Grimm said.

    "Where there's smoke, there's probably fire," he said.

    He also criticized the county's investigators for requiring too much evidence to substantiate a complaint.

    Grimm blamed those problems on a lack of training.

    The Family Services spokeswoman said the agency was reviewing the Rimer cases but that state law prevented her from discussing any details not included in the child fatality document.

    The agency could change policies based on its findings, Skorupski said.

    All complaints to Family Services are screened and forwarded for investigation or logged as "information only" depending on the allegations, she said.

    If a complaint is investigated, the investigator must find a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. If such evidence is not uncovered, the case is closed.

    The case worker can recommend services for the family, but no follow-ups are conducted, Skorupski said.

    The agency's investigators are among its most experienced employees, with at least two years of child welfare experience, she said.

    The department is improving its training program and recently began a pilot program that puts trainees in the field to learn alongside seasoned investigators, she said. The program was recently completed in Washoe County.

    Coleman and Grimm had little hope that much would change at Family Services, which they said is pulled down by a culture of retaliation and mistrust among its workers.

    The Rimer case is just the tip of the iceberg, they said, adding they feared more children under Family Services' eye would die.

    "There are going to be more kids dead, and it's not because they fell through the cracks," Coleman said. "It's because they slipped through the fingers of a case worker."

    Contact reporter Brian Haynes at bhaynes@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0281.



    Leave Your Comment 50 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Tami wrote on July 05, 2008 10:31 PM: How sad a child has to die before anybody will even look their way, I was told years ago by a social service worker when I reported one of the children in my nieghbor hood that one of the children pretty much have to have proof of great physical harm or DIE before they can really do anything.I think if a social worker comes to a persons house and the child has burns from light bulbs, lighters,or welts that is seen on a childs body or physical harm they should be able to take the child on the spot.I kept calling they told me to stop calling they checked it out everything was fine the case was closed,the father shot the child 6 months later he was only 11 years old how sad he didn't get to even begin to enjoy his life.I'm not the perfect parent, but it shouldn't hurt to be a child.Dave Pelzer said it all in his book( A child called it)


    Amazed wrote on July 02, 2008 05:03 PM: Lazy People. 17 hours. Started searching but stopped to eat brocolli.
    Family all slept in the living room and nobody noticed.
    I read this sh@t, but none of it makes sense. The parents and older siblings are to blame. I grew up in a large family and contributed to the upbringing of my younger siblings. The parents should serve time, the older siblings should also accept that they are to blame as well.


    Jill Marie wrote on July 02, 2008 04:06 PM: The only thing I can say is this should all show us to hug our kids a little tighter these days. I can't believe the "system" is so bad that after 5 calls to CPS the kids werent taken away in the first place. 22 calls??? Come on now, if I call more than once on a dog whos gotten out of its yard, it gets taken away and taken to the pound. Why weren't the kids in protective custody. Why did it take more than 3 calls in regards to a disabled child to "close" the case?? Does the death of the child substantiate the abuse history?? Just my opinion, but if you have too many calls into CPS, you shouldn't be allowed to have anymore kids.


    freda anestasi wrote on July 01, 2008 01:30 PM: how can anyone not notice a child for almost 48 hours? another child dead for neglect, how sad that this child had to suffer for so long.


    jnr wrote on July 01, 2008 01:23 PM: I have had two run-ins with CPS due to a split family circus. The first time was a good experience as the person we dealt with was very experienced. However the last time we went to CPS with a problem, the senior investigator and the investigator looked like they just both got out of community college. These two were to have the wisdom to figure out if a child was endangered or not. It was the worst experience I have ever had with a paid "professional". They pidgeonhold the case soley based on a 12 year old knowing what child abuse meant. They said the child was coached. I have seen a number of after school televsion specials that spell out child abuse ..... how dare these post-graduates expect a 12 year old not know what child abuse means. Next time listen to these kids , they are smarter than you think.


    sheila wrote on July 01, 2008 12:51 AM: The neighbors did their job, however the county failed at theres..Its a shame to read the cps worker didnt come until 4 weeks later...Im a foster parent and I take pride in the kids I have custody of and I make sure that all of the children are counted for on a daily basis. Whoever have pity on the parents should now have sorrow for the other children, living in filth, and no food! And the mother had the nerve's to cry at court while being arraigned, who cried for Jason...we all are now shedding some type of tear!


    TJ wrote on July 01, 2008 12:01 AM: I am truly sickened that a child has lost his life! Child services was there 21 times and found nothing wrong? Give me a break. The case workers and their supervisors should each be put on trial and made to sit right next to the parents. They should all have to answer to their negligence!


    LVfosterparent wrote on June 30, 2008 08:56 PM: Every caseworker we worked with was new and being trained. Two soon became investigators.

    It is not always an investigator that determines a home is safe for children. A new untrained caseworker can determine if a home is safe to reunify a child. They often schedule the home visits with the family & can brush off deplorable conditions & evidence of domestic violence as "messy" - which is not unsafe for a child.

    Caseworkers can hide their lack of action with "privacy & confidentiality" and some retaliate against foster homes who report their behavior or assert that their decisions are wrong to the courts.

    If DFS remains the same there WILL be more Jason Rimers. But, unfortunately there may not be many loving foster homes left who are willing to participate in this system that is not protecting the CHILDREN, only the parents.


    Steve Williams wrote on June 30, 2008 07:02 PM: Oops. I see what looks like a major problem in an otherwise fine story. Mr. Haynes writes that the dead boy was "forgotten in his family's sport utility vehicle for 17 hours." The DA's office (and I) believe otherwise. The couple has been charged with murder precisely because it appears the boy was
    not "forgotten."

    The prosecutor will attempt to show the parents knew the boy was in that vehicle and that the mother purposely used their other vehicle to pick up some other kids to avoid seeing him. That's why the charge is murder and not negligent manslaughter.

    Careful.


    Herb wrote on June 30, 2008 06:56 PM: CPS should have taken away these children years ago.The complaints on these parents go back to 1988, so poor little Jason shouldn't have been born in the first place. Not everyone should be allowed to reproduce, especially those with a prior history of abuse and neglect.


    Read All Comments