Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


DRAWING WATER: STATE ENGINEER GRANTS SOME OF AGENCY'S REQUEST

Ruling covers three valleys in Lincoln County

Their proposed pipeline might be half-empty so far, but Southern Nevada Water Authority officials prefer to see it as half-full.

Deputy General Manager Kay Brothers said she is generally pleased by a ruling Wednesday that grants the authority a little more than half of the groundwater it sought from three valleys in central Lincoln County.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas
  • DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Halverson removed from bench



  • The order issued by State Engineer Tracy Taylor clears the way for the authority to pump more than 6 billion gallons of groundwater a year from Cave, Delamar and Dry Lake valleys. When stretched through reuse, the water could supply almost 64,000 homes.

    The authority wanted to pipe more than 11 billion gallons a year from the three valleys as part of its groundwater exportation project targeting parts of rural Clark, Lincoln and White Pine counties.

    "We thought more water was available, but we know the state engineer is conservative and we respect that," Brothers said.

    Taylor's ruling mirrors a previous decision that gave the authority only a part of the water it was seeking from White Pine County's Spring Valley. In that order, issued last year, the state's top water regulator approved 13 billion gallons a year out of a request for almost 30 billion. But Taylor agreed to let the authority take an additional 6.5 billion gallons annually if a decade of pumping proves the water is available.

    Brothers said the authority's resource plan for the next 50 years was built on the assumption that the agency would not get all the groundwater it applied for in eastern Nevada.

    "Our planning horizon has always looked at a range, and what we've seen so far is in that range," she said.

    By as early as 2013, the authority hopes to start delivering rural groundwater to the Las Vegas Valley through a pipeline that is expected to stretch more than 250 miles and cost between $2 billion and $3.5 billion.

    Authority officials see the project as a way to supply water for growth in the Las Vegas Valley and insulate the community from drought on the Colorado River, which provides 90 percent of the valley's drinking water.

    Critics argue that large-scale groundwater pumping in the arid valleys of eastern Nevada threatens the region's wildlife and the livelihoods of its ranchers and farmers.

    Wednesday's ruling drew a tepid response from those most opposed to the project.

    "We think the decision was sort of a mixed bag," said Simeon Herskovits, a New Mexico-based attorney representing stakeholders who have protested the authority's plans to the state.

    Herskovits said Taylor agreed with some of the concerns raised by the opposition and "didn't bite" on some of the authority's more speculative arguments. But, he said, the state engineer failed to address the long-term problems with pumping so much water, though the authority is "locking it in as a permanent supply."

    "There are some things to be pleased about" in the ruling, Herskovits said, "but overall, we are concerned that the outcome was too much water permitted to the Southern Nevada Water Authority."

    For Lincoln County resident Farrel Lytle, the issue is personal. He said he comes from a family that has been running cattle in Dry Lake Valley since the 1870s, "so, yeah, we have a long-term interest over there."

    His cousin Kenneth Lytle and several other ranchers still use the valley for livestock grazing.

    "That's their winter range," Farrel Lytle said. "They can see their wells running dry, and they're out of business."

    Of particular concern to him is the figure Taylor came up with for the amount of water that flows into the valley each year through precipitation, in-flow from neighboring basins and other sources. Lytle said Taylor's perennial yield estimate of 12,700 acre-feet, about 41 billion gallons, seems far too high.

    "It's called Dry Lake Valley for a reason," he said. "There aren't any alfalfa circles out there."

    Of the 6.1 billion gallons a year Taylor granted to the authority Wednesday, 3.8 billion will come from Dry Lake Valley, 1.5 billion from Cave Valley and 800 million from Delamar Valley.

    Brothers said the groundwater from Delamar Valley, about 90 miles north of Las Vegas, will be part of the first to arrive as the pipeline network is built from south to north.

    Under Taylor's order, the authority will be required to develop a monitoring and mitigation program and to collect data for at least two years before exporting any water from the three valleys.

    With the Lincoln County basins out of the way, the one piece of the pipeline puzzle that remains is Snake Valley, a White Pine County watershed that straddles the Nevada-Utah border.

    The authority has applied to take as much as 16 billion gallons of water a year from the valley, which is home to Great Basin National Park and some of the pipeline project's most outspoken critics.

    Taylor will hold a planning session in Carson City next week to set the ground rules for a hearing on Snake Valley. The hearing is expected to take place early next year.

    Opponents are weighing a court challenge of Wednesday's ruling. Herskovits said it is too soon to predict whether they will go that route.

    "I've read it once so far," he said of the 40-page document. "I'd like to read it two or three more times."

    Even if the ruling goes unchallenged, the pipeline project still could wind up in federal court. Environmental reviews are under way that could trigger lawsuits from ranchers and conservation groups, Herskovits said.

    Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0350.



    Leave Your Comment 13 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    juzme wrote on July 11, 2008 03:10 PM: Go ahead, Clark County. Take everything you want. Obviously Lincoln County doesn't need their water, for all the Alphfa fields, cattle.. Growth in Alamo..(and Alamo, ONLY !!) It doesn't have anything else..No tourist attractions, No money..Nuttin..
    Soo...Help yourself..You greedy S*O*B's..!!! Can't even help your own city. Schools, Teachers, Kids..Homeless people, who lost their jobs, But, boy you can sure spend what you really don't have..What's with ole Jim Gibbons and the so called money shortage Nevada has?? Doesn't make sense..But Clark County doesn't make sense..Keep on building all those high rise condos and more Casino's..You really need them, don't you ! Nice place to be FROM..!


    Roger wrote on July 11, 2008 11:26 AM: Once again, the state egineer caves into the Las Vegas Water Mafia.

    We all know the price of that pipeline will keep going up and up. The education of your children and the quality of your health care will always take a back seat to greed whores like Pat Mulroy.


    Chris wrote on July 10, 2008 03:16 PM: It would be nice if we could have a moratorium on housing, but it's not going to happen. This is a state of greed, where shiny and new things are continually needed. The big casinos which control this state need to keep growing to keep shareholders happy. Along with the growth will be the need for pipelines and new utilities. I only hope that the potential new homes will help defray the cost of the new pipeline. Plus, the level of Lake Mead has dropped about 100 feet since the year 2000. We do need a another source of water in case of the unfortunate incident of Lake Mead drying up...


    William D. Tomany wrote on July 10, 2008 01:06 PM: The State Engineer caved in to Mulroy and the greedy developers again
    Do we see another Owens Valley in the making in Nevada

    I think so

    A real tragedy for Nevada


    Mark$ wrote on July 10, 2008 12:05 PM: NEVER has the R-J or any of the PRO-DEVELOPMENT corporate media in Nevada ONCE delved into the issue of how much this extra water for more development is going to COST each & every HOME-OWNER already here. Totally irresponsible journalism. Because of course a FEW become fabulously rich, at the expense of the MANY.


    Edward Lenzini wrote on July 10, 2008 11:22 AM: Since we can't stop this fiasco, I propose that we name the water line after its most ardent proponent. We already have the joke of a monorail, so let's name the water line the Mulroy Monotube. Sadly, her waterline will cost taxpayers a fortune, while at least the monorail was privately built.

    Of course, when the monorail finally dies its deserved death, I'm sure the taxpayers will be paying a bundle to keep it running. Yes, just what we need-the government running it. Can you say Union conductors at the doors?


    tim wrote on July 10, 2008 11:01 AM: deputy general director?what the h%#@ is that?i wonder how many other useless titles come before and after that one?just another useless bureaucrat trying to keep their job,without that water from cow county they are out of a job.ol pat must be getting so much flak over this,she handed it off to her flunky.water district rules,yee haw!


    noname wrote on July 10, 2008 09:23 AM: OK..Please explain this..A state who has almost a Billion in Debt..gonna fork out over 2 Billion+ for a dumb pipeline. Doesn't make sense..!! Lincoln Co. is the poorest county n NV..All they have is underground water..Nothing else.. One little hole in the wall town doesn't even have a grocery store.. So, Vegas, who has millions in gambling $$$$ and can't help the schools..is going to get water from a county who hurting in Revenue, tourist and everything else..!! Use that money to help the schools, kids and teachers, Don't make them suffer more then they already are... Explain this dumb idea?? But Vegas, keep on building and let's see more houses go into Foreclosure..Gee makes sense..NOT... What a idiotic idea, Vegas..Spend it on what is needed..Not water from somewhere else..Who's next.. Mexico..Yeah right


    Norman P. wrote on July 10, 2008 08:10 AM: Let's see. 1 in 99 homes here in preforclosure. No real industry-just casinos. Gasoline ain't going down. But hey-we're going to spend 3.5 billion-for the future...The future of what? Reminds me of Houston in the 80's, when each new subdivision had their own utility district. Problem was that when the builders pulled out due to the economy, instead of building say 500 homes, they sold only 20. So the few homeowners left got water and sewer bills of $4,000-a month. So they were gone, too. I guess Patty Mulroy and the Unions must be prescient about the future-Not. What a coming boondoggle....


    sad & discusted wrote on July 10, 2008 08:02 AM: The water authority in Las Vegas is as bad as the IRS. They do whatever they want and nobody questions any of it! Watch out everyone! Next they will take that cool drink of water right out of your hand! It puts money in the pocket of a few, what else matters?


    Read All Comments