Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Monday
Mar 15, 2010
Clouds And Sun
Clouds And Sun 69° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News


Porter studies federal land plan

Congressman says he probably won't decide on Gold Butte soon

WASHINGTON -- Nevada wilderness advocates have launched a new drive for Congress to designate more federally protected land in Clark County, and are targeting Rep. Jon Porter to take a lead on what could be a controversial issue.

The Nevada Republican said he is considering the proposal but probably will not decide soon whether to embrace the plan that calls for upgrading wilderness designations in the 344,400-acre Gold Butte region.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Man arrested, pair shot in car incident
  2. Off-duty Las Vegas officer shoots armed suspect in Henderson home invasion
  3. 'Dice' miffed over 'Donny Clay' show
  4. Ex-Green Valley Ranch manager arrested
  5. Edwards mistress: 'We love each other very much'
  6. UNLV budget axe could cut entire programs
  7. Hepatitis C fight consumes patients
  8. Rebels will battle Northern Iowa on Thursday in Oklahoma City in first round
  9. Las Vegas courthouse, Pentagon guns traced to Memphis police
  10. Galardi makes case for freedom




"There is always an urgency when it comes to preserve and protect public lands, and I understand that," Porter said. "But there is a process that has to happen first," including sign-offs from local communities.

Wedged between Lake Mead and the Parashant National Monument in Arizona, Gold Butte has been called by preservationists "Nevada's piece of the Grand Canyon."

The remote area 65 miles northeast of Las Vegas features intriguing rock formations, colorful sandstone cliffs, petroglyphs and remnants of mining sites that thrived for a few years at the turn of the century.

But in most all cases bills that seek to alter federal land use in Nevada are scrutinized by stakeholders that include government officials, ranchers, off-road vehicle enthusiasts and conservationists.

For close to a decade environmental groups have sought to designate Gold Butte as a national conservation area, the same level of protection as Red Rock Canyon and Sloan Canyon in the western and southern ends of the Las Vegas Valley.

Within the Gold Butte region, Sens. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and John Ensign, R-Nev., in 2002 arranged the most protective federal wilderness designations for Small Lime Canyon and Jumbo Springs, totaling 28,000 acres.

The Bureau of Land Management has designated 344,437 acres of Gold Butte -- more than 537 square miles -- as an "area of critical environmental concern." But advocates say that does not give the BLM enough tools against encroachment by dirt bike riders and paint ball warriors.

Advocates approached Porter in May with a new proposal to designate a portion of Gold Butte as wilderness surrounded by a national conservation area.

They also unveiled a poll financed by five organizations including the Nevada Wilderness Project, the Campaign for America's Wilderness, the Sierra Club, Friends of Nevada Wilderness and the Wilderness Society.

The survey, conducted by Republican pollster Glen Bolger, indicated 66 percent of Clark County residents would favor creating a national conservation area with wilderness at Gold Butte. Opposed was 27 percent, according to the poll of 400 likely voters. The margin of error was 4.9 percent.

In Porter's 3rd Congressional District, the poll numbers were 68 percent in favor and 26 percent opposed.

John Wallin, director of the Nevada Wilderness Project, said the groups have delayed release of their detailed plans so the Nevada delegation could examine them and discuss them with local officials.

"To be frank, we are still waiting to hear from Congressman Porter's office when they will be done communicating with some of the communities," Wallin said.

"The (Capitol) Hill calendar is compressing by the second and we think this needs to happen soon," he said.

Wallin said the plan is a compromise that reduces proposed wilderness by 80,000 acres and does not close any roads to satisfy those concerned that land will be locked off.

"On its own merits there is real opportunity here for conservation," Wallin said. "We can completely jump past the normal very tired conversations as to whether there is access being banned. We can do this without banning anybody."

Wallin said wilderness groups are seeking broad input. Discussions are ongoing with officials in Clark County and Mesquite, "and we are ready to go talk to the Moapa Town Board."

Porter's district contains Gold Butte.

He also is the chief sponsor of a House bill, introduced in October with Rep. Dean Heller, R-Nev., that conveys 4,900 acres to Mesquite for an airport and associated development.

Wilderness advocates want the Gold Butte plan to be added to that bill. Clark County leaders and representatives of other interest groups also are eyeing the Mesquite bill.

According to two sources, the county would like to add language to gain ownership of Nellis Dunes, a 10,000-acre patch of desert near Las Vegas Speedway that is popular among off-roaders. The dirt track would be turned into a country recreation area.

In an interview Thursday, Porter said there is more homework to be done to vet the Gold Butte proposal, and whether it should be added to the Mesquite bill.

"There are a lot of families and individuals who have been doing their best to preserve and protect Gold Butte for years," Porter said. "Most everyone we talk to understands and agrees there needs to be some preservation and protection.

"But before anything is attached to that (Mesquite) bill, at least within my control, we are going to make sure the town boards of Moapa Valley are going to have a say and the community of Moapa Valley and Virgin Valley," Porter said. "They have been stewards of that area for years and they need to play an integral part."

Mesquite officials expect that the airport land bill will acquire an amendment of some kind that will be satisfactory to environmentalists.

Successful Nevada public land bills usually open BLM land for development, balanced with new wilderness. That formula enabled passage of a Clark County bill in 2002, a Lincoln County bill in 2004 and a White Pine County bill in 2006.

"An environmental component is almost mandatory," Mesquite City Manager Tim Hacker said. "It is just the reality of moving land acts through Congress."

Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Johnathan L. Abbinett wrote on July 13, 2008 12:20 AM: The only thing I'm waiting for Jon Porter "The Political Puppet" and "Bush Bag-Boy" to decide is when he is going to cash out and "cut and run" like so many Republican cowards recently - the sooner the better!

Porter has a long, pathetic record of coming back to Nevada and telling the Veterans and Military Families what they want to hear and just blowing smoke up their behinds - then, going back to Washington, D.C. and voting against the very needs of our military, veterans and military community! Porter is a classic poltical hypocrite and is the kind of bum we need to vote out!

Porter has voted, time and again, against pay increases for our troops, our military families, much needed equipment (until his Republican Bush buddies can get their companies started up and grab the contracts - while our troops do without important items like body armor), and Porter has voted against fully funding the V.A. - yet, he shows up and acts like he is all for the VA Medical Center (when, in fact, he work against funding it from the very beginning) - I'm fed up with this posing patriot!

Go back to Boulder City and selling bogus insurance policies Porter - your flip-flopping and trying to move to the center on the issues won't change the facts about your long, lousy voting record!

The voters in C.D. #3 have figured out Porter's scam and that Porter is all about only representing his wealthy donors and Washington, D.C. interest in Nevada - Porter does NOT represent Nevada in Washington!

Republican cross-over voters can end their shame by voting this bum OUT!


Report abuse

tim wrote on July 12, 2008 06:22 PM: let's lock up more land for the enviro-nazis.nobody goes there now but a few.but let's lock them out too,that way the gov.can charge a fee to visit it.the tree-huggers ala the dem party are trying to raise a non-issue to boost tina the taxer,southern smoothie from u.n.l.v,the double-dipper.


Report abuse

RANDY wrote on July 12, 2008 11:07 AM: if you want to see what happens when you lock up or so - called preserve federal land, just look at what's happening in California. all the fires in California would not be as severe if they would let ranchers graze federal land,let home-owners clear dead wood, and make fire breaks around private property.


Report abuse

joe wrote on July 12, 2008 10:41 AM: The delay is because Mormon Porter is trying to figure out a way to sell some of the area to Mormon Gibbons, with a tax assesed value of $5,000.00 per year but have Mormon Gibbons pay only $15.00 per year. Mormon Ensign and Mormon Reid are re-writing the protection bill they made in 2002 to accomodate Mormon Gibbons, but it will take some time, and approval from the Mormon presidency.


Report abuse

tozzcat wrote on July 12, 2008 09:05 AM: The agenda of the Wilderness groups is to remove the land from public use. The extreme conservationist groups (most of those listed are extreme) are bad for this country. Their agenda is to reduce the population of this country by restricting safe and sound use of the land.

Think I am wrong? Read their agenda from their own websites. Remember Ted Turner’s comment several months ago? He stated a “die off” of population would not be a bad thing!

They are extremely well financed and among the most powerful special interest groups in the nation. They fabricate most of their supporting documents and never trust any survey they do. It will never tell the truth and that has been proven time and again.

We all want to protect our planet but with reasonable and sane rules for land use. The people of Nevada better wake up or most of this state will be a wilderness that nobody will be able to use.


Report abuse

br wrote on July 12, 2008 08:10 AM: "They also unveiled a poll financed by five organizations including the Nevada Wilderness Project, the Campaign for America's Wilderness, the Sierra Club, Friends of Nevada Wilderness and the Wilderness Society."

The usual suspects polling each other with skewed questions and a high margin of error.

Carefully selection of who is asked what questions can easily get a 66% approval in any poll. This smells like an agenda by the usual enviro-wackos who do not want people to intrude on public or private "pristine " lands.





Report abuse

Bill wrote on July 12, 2008 07:27 AM: Better get it done before November, John. You and all the other Bush lackeys are toast.