Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


SEX IN LIBRARY! SAY IT AIN'T SO

Mom learns computer users see what they want

Live Action Sex!

Delivered Right to You!

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas
  • DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Halverson removed from bench



  • Available Any Time!

    At the Library!

    Huh?

    Turns out, anyone with a library card, a shuddering lack of shame and an IQ just high enough to click a mouse can plop his butt down at one of the local library's computers and do whatever the heck he feels like doing. So long as it's legal.

    Porn, of course, is legal. It is also available online, we hear.

    And so it went a couple of Monday afternoons ago at the West Charleston library.

    Lisa Racine was there with her kids. She's always there with her kids.

    "We're big readers," she explained.

    The kids -- four of them, ages 5 to 12 -- aren't in school right now, and you can only watch the Veggie Tales movies so many times. So, the library.

    It was about 4:30 that Monday afternoon, Racine said. They'd just left the kiddie area and were headed over to fiction, where Racine was going to get herself something to read.

    Then, she glanced. Nudity. Sex. Moving pictures, zooming in on a woman's parts and such. A man in a red T-shirt and a blue ball cap. Watching.

    Racine turned away. She ushered the kids out of harm's way. She approached two librarians.

    Umm, she said, can you stop that man?

    No, she said they told her, we cannot. There was something said about the First Amendment.

    Would you mind if I ask him to stop? she asked. Go ahead, the librarians said understandingly, but we don't think he's going to.

    Racine approached the ball cap man, deep into his porn, now a naked woman dancing the way naked women dance in Internet videos.

    She tapped him on the shoulder.

    "Do you realize there are children and other people all around?"

    "Leave. Me. Alone!" ballcap said. He flailed his arm. He seemed angry. He went back to his porn.

    Racine warned the nearby moms and left.

    "I was so upset," said Racine, 37, who moved to Las Vegas about three years ago. "I was shaking inside."

    She complained to more than just the librarians. She called the Las Vegas-Clark County Library District's Board of Trustees. She wrote to the newspaper.

    It is about all she can do.

    Pat Marvel, a library district spokeswoman, said the district doesn't restrict what adults can look at on the computers, just like there aren't restrictions on which books adults can check out.

    "If a parent is walking their child around the adult computer section, it is likely -- it is possible -- for that child to be exposed to something that parent doesn't want their child to see," Marvel said.

    She said the libraries have children's sections, where the computers have safety filters on them. And children are not allowed to use the computers in the adult section without written parental permission.

    "We don't tell adults what they can look at," Marvel said.

    She called what happened to Racine "an unfortunate collision," and said the libraries do not have enough space to physically separate the adult computers from any area where a child might be walking by.

    The library district follows guidelines from the American Library Association. That group is a staunch advocate of fully open libraries.

    The district's Internet policy states, in part:

    "The Library District cannot be held responsible for the content of the Internet. Not all information found on the Internet is accurate, complete, up-to-date, and/or legally or philosophically acceptable to all individuals."

    Marvel explained that library officials would put a stop to illegal activity, such as identity theft or child pornography, if they became aware of it.

    They won't censor nudity.

    But they could if they wanted to. Other libraries do.

    Stephen Bates, a communications professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas who teaches media law, said a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case established that libraries are allowed to use filters if they choose to.

    "A library could definitely install filtering software," he said. "It could create an adult section separate from the rest."

    He said filtering software has been known to block access to legitimate sites, so that's a weakness. He also acknowledged that a separate adult section has its limitations.

    "There is no perfect solution," he said.

    He noted that it is illegal in Nevada to expose a minor to inappropriate material. But the law makes a specific exception for libraries.

    None of this makes sense to Racine.

    She points out that her kids couldn't get into an R-rated movie. They can't go into an adult bookstore or a strip club. They can't even buy a nudie magazine at the gas station.

    Yet, they could potentially see much worse at the library.

    So now, she believes she must police things. She'll have to steer the kids around the computers, just in case.

    She'll be "extra, extra careful."

    "That's my job as a parent."

    Which is exactly what Marvel, the library spokeswoman, said too.

    Contact reporter Richard Lake at rlake @reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0307.



    Leave Your Comment 55 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    SC wrote on July 22, 2008 01:34 PM: What is wrong with you people!!! This is about children seeing things that should be for adults only. How would all of you feel if your little girl or boy was walking past a nude person on the street or being flashed by someone? If you want to see porn go somewhere where there won't be children walking by. Give the innocent ones a break.


    Lenny V wrote on July 20, 2008 05:13 PM: I understand what theyre saying but what kind of scumbag is looking at porn in a library. And yes if my kids saw that crap I'd probably knock the guy out.


    L. Watkins wrote on July 20, 2008 10:55 AM: The first amendment gives us rights,
    yes. Am appalled by the computer users
    lack of sound judgement and poor social
    mores. For shame.


    William wrote on July 19, 2008 10:42 PM: Conservatives, puritans and the Taliban would love all glimpses of the human body made illegal.

    Should breast-fed babies be protected from viewing nipples?

    Let them that is without sex-organs cast the first stone.


    juris wrote on July 19, 2008 06:09 AM: If you don't want unnecessary tax dollars spent get active yourself and do what Tambora suggested. Then once people see their self being broadcasted the harmless ones will cease to that activity due to community shame. "LIZ" religion has nothing to do with this, people of faith and clergy are just as guilty of these type of acts. LIZ please do not address this with a pathetic, delusional reasoning about a lack of religion. I personally do not think Atheist are the ones down there watching porn on a library.


    Michael Ray Thompson wrote on July 17, 2008 08:10 PM: Wow, I'm glad I'm not a parent. I would hate to have to keep my kids away from the crap I used to look at as a young punk!


    Angry Reader wrote on July 17, 2008 01:20 PM: Ken,

    If I see you 'cuff a few across the jaw' of anyone reading anything in a library I will shoot you faster than a Henderson cop chasing an ice cream lady.

    Just so we understand each other.


    Ironic wrote on July 16, 2008 08:54 PM: anyone else notice that free speech has tried to shut down anybody that does not agree with him. Hmmmmm. (oops, did I spell that wrong)


    Gramar Police wrote on July 16, 2008 08:13 PM: Free speech.
    Who, appointed, you. To be the Grammer Cop. It's a blog m0r0n.


    Library User wrote on July 16, 2008 08:42 AM: So, if the children are being allowed to "pass by" and view it because they cannot restrict the adults, then why put filters on the children's computers. Likely to protect the children from viewing inappropriate material. So, if you're taking a stand there, why not across the entire library? Safety and security of your patrons should be paramount no matter their age and no matter what section of the library they are in. The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Perhaps the library needs to reread the constitution.


    Read All Comments