Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Guidance on term limits sought

High court asked for replacement process




CARSON CITY -- Attorneys for the Legislature and secretary of state's office hope the Nevada Supreme Court makes it clear in its coming decision on term limits how replacements will be named if candidates for elected offices are ruled ineligible to serve.

Legislative attorney Kevin Powers said Monday he worries that district attorneys in counties with ineligible candidates will have conflicting views on how replacements should be named. To avoid lawsuits, Powers said the Supreme Court should spell out in each instance how replacements will be selected.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat




  • Justices potentially could make a decision in the next few weeks that would find 20 local and state officeholders are ineligible to serve additional terms. The pending ruling also potentially could block 13 legislators from serving again in 2009.

    Adding to possible confusion: Disqualified candidates' names would remain on the ballot for the Aug. 12 primary. Ballots already have been printed and voting machines programmed for the primary, said Matt Griffin, deputy secretary of state.

    If the Supreme Court rules as expected before the primary that certain candidates can't run, then votes cast for those candidates wouldn't be counted, Griffin said. If the court rules after the primary and an ineligible partisan candidate happens to win the race, then that candidate's political party would pick a replacement to run in the general election.

    Griffin said justices might decide that signs should be displayed at polling places listing ineligible candidates for voters.

    Such signs were posted in 2006 after the death of state Controller Kathy Augustine, whose name remained on the primary election ballots. The law on posting signs in polling places, however, generally applies in situations where candidates have died.

    It's one remedy the Supreme Court could order, Griffin said.

    Early voting begins July 26. Primary election ballots were mailed July 3 to Nevadans who requested absentee ballots.

    The options under state law that Griffin and Legislative Counsel Brenda Erdoes see for naming replacements for ineligible candidates are:

    • In cases where only one candidate is running for a nonpartisan office, such as university system Regent Thalia Dondero, who is seeking re-election, the replacement would be chosen by the governor. The ineligible candidate's name would not then appear on the general election ballot.

    • In the case of multiple candidates seeking a nonpartisan office, such as school board, the two candidates who receive the next greatest number of votes would advance to the general election if an ineligible candidate earns the highest number of votes.

    • In the case of several candidates seeking a partisan office, such as the Clark County Commission race involving incumbent Bruce Woodbury, who faces two challengers in the Republican primary, the replacement would be named by the county central committee for the party. But for that to happen, the state's high court must fail to make a ruling before the primary and the ineligible candidate must win the primary.

    • In the case of a candidate who faces no challengers in the primary for a partisan office, such as Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, the party's county central committee picks a replacement for the general election.

    • In the case of a legislative candidate such as Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, who faces Sharron Angle in a partisan primary, then the central committee for the county party would name a replacement should the ineligible candidate win the primary.

    Review-Journal writer Scott Wyland contributed to this report. Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@ reviewjournal.com or 775-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    UNLVStud wrote on July 15, 2008 07:52 PM: With the LuvGuv's track record on appointments, I wouldn't trust his pick for Regent.

    I find it interesting that if Raggio got the majority in his primary, and he was booted from the ballot, that the nomination wouldn't fall automatically to Angle, but instead would be picked by a smoke filled back room of the Republican party. Wouldn't that defeat the "will" of the people that was expressed in the "Term Limits" amendment?


    Unamed Politician wrote on July 15, 2008 11:56 AM: You people are so dumb.
    We will do as we please,and there's nothing you all can do about it.
    When we beat this rap and we will,we'll make sure it can't come up again.See ya,suckers!


    nvkorruption wrote on July 15, 2008 10:45 AM: Some of these officials are on the corruption radar (including Justices). Would a felony conviction qualify as making some of these crooks ineligible to serve?
    Prosecution will assist in the term limit drama.
    The general public should not be as concerned about what these vermin are going to do to preserve their interests as much as making sure that they are voted out at every opportunity, and unbearable pressure for an end to the regime of corruption remains relentless until some of these people are prosecuted.


    jl wrote on July 15, 2008 05:14 AM: Life long crooks.
    Cops, lawyers and judges.
    They are all want your money.

    We need term linits to weed out and clean up the system. Vote 2 years or less for any city or government job.

    STOP the steak dinners..