Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Reid presents bill aimed at polygamy

Senate hearing on measure is today

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Harry Reid on Wednesday introduced a bill in Congress to crack down on polygamous groups, charging that crime is organized and "rampant" within the communities.

Reid's first stop today to promote the bill will be at a hearing that he largely organized with the Senate Judiciary Committee.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say




  • The measure calls for formation of a federal task force to combat "the unique set of crimes committed by polygamist organizations."

    It also would make available $2 million in federal grants for local authorities to investigate and prosecute crimes linked to polygamy. Another $12 million over five years would be offered to organizations that provide protection and services to family members seeking to escape plural marriages.

    Former members of polygamous groups have charged domestic and sexual abuse is common through forced marriages and unions involving underage girls, along with other crimes such as welfare fraud, tax evasion, extortion and kidnapping.

    Reid, the Senate majority leader from Nevada, has equated activities of polygamist groups with organized crime and has been pressing for federal racketeering investigations of their activities.

    The Senate hearing is expected to focus on the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a breakaway Mormon sect whose adherents believe plural marriage is ordained by God. The mainstream Mormon church renounced polygamy in 1904.

    FLDS membership is based in communities on the border of Utah and Arizona, while members also live in Nevada and other Western states. Its membership is estimated to be between 6,000 and 10,000.

    State and local authorities have pursued criminal allegations against FLDS leaders and members, while Reid has argued a stronger federal hand is necessary.

    FLDS leader Warren Jeffs was convicted in Utah last year of two counts of being an accomplice to rape, for his role in arranging a 2002 marriage between a 14-year-old girl and her 19-year-old first cousin.

    Jeffs faces similar charges in Arizona and this week was indicted by a grand jury in Texas on sexual assault charges.

    "We are taking aim at the blatant and systemic crime that is rampant within these polygamist groups," Reid said in a statement accompanying his bill.

    Reid, one of 16 Mormons serving in Congress, did not consult with the church in forming his bill, according to his spokesman Jon Summers.

    The Mormon church has not taken a position on the bill, spokeswoman Kim Farah said. In an e-mail, she said "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has repeatedly expressed concern about the illegal practice of polygamy and persistent reports of the possible emotional and physical abuse of women and children."

    Today's hearing is entitled "Crimes Associated with Polygamy: The Need for a Coordinated State and Federal Response."

    Chief federal prosecutors from Nevada and Utah are scheduled to testify along with attorneys general from Arizona and Texas. Also listed to testify are former FLDS member Carolyn Jessup, and Stephen Singular, who has written about the FLDS and Jeffs.

    The Salt Lake Tribune reported that FLDS spokesman Rod Parker, a Salt Lake City attorney, sent the Senate Judiciary Committee a letter protesting that no members of the group were invited to testify.

    "History is replete with examples of misinformation becoming the foundation of persecution and hysteria, leading in turn to real harm to real people," Parker wrote, according to the newspaper.

    Parker could not be reached by telephone message or e-mail on Wednesday.

    Asked why there were no FLDS witnesses invited, Summers said the committee did not need to hear from them.

    "This is not a trial," Summers said. "This is a hearing about ways to increase enforcement against crimes committed by these groups. Are they going to come in and say this is the best way to bust us?"

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@ stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 37 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    JDD wrote on July 29, 2008 11:55 PM: Readers may be interested to know that Senator Reid is himself a mainstream Mormon. I don't always agree with his tactics, but if this doesn't prove that Mormons are in reality opposed to polygamy, I don't know what will.


    Report abuse

    Irritated at inaccuracy wrote on July 26, 2008 10:24 AM: The quality of journalism continues to
    be pretty slipshod. Journalists appar-
    ently don't bother to check or confirm
    dates and "facts" to make certain they
    are correct & accurate before including
    them in their writings.

    The author of this piece states, "The
    mainstream Mormon church renounced
    polygamy in 1904". With any effort to
    check his facts, he would have found
    that date to be in error. The actual
    date was in 1890.

    Will we ever see the day when they give
    a hoot about being accurate & factual???


    Report abuse

    joe the bigot wrote on July 25, 2008 04:14 PM: joe,

    You spout facts as if you are convinced they are truth, and refuse to accept when they are wrong. This has been pointed out to you a few times now. You couldn't be more wrong, for instance, concerning the LDS church's desire for people to find things out for themselves. People who are interested in learing about the religion are encouraged to study, pray, ask any questions they have. Anyone wanting to know about the beliefs of the LDS church can find them easily on line at www.mormon.org.

    You speak of the LDS church as if it is something dark and sinister. I encourage anyone who wants to really know what goes on in an LDS church to attend a meeting or two. You will not find "brainwashed" hordes as you like to think they are. You'll find people who believe in Jesus Christ and try to follow his example in all they do. We don't always succeed, because, like you, joe, we're human. But we do believe that when we fail, we can seek forgiveness and obtain it. If that runs contrary to your beliefs, I supposed we'll all just have to live with it. But I don't go around attacking your religion (if you have one; you've never divulged it). However, I still maintain you have an axe to grind. I suspect you either a) feel it your personal mission to "save" anyone interested in joining the LDS church, or b) were once a member yourself and have become disaffected. Whatever your motive, your hatred comes oozing through all of your posts, and you take ANY opportunity to post on what may even remotely involve the LDS church or it's members.


    Report abuse

    Get it right wrote on July 25, 2008 02:36 PM: Joe,
    A few observations about your observations to my comment.

    First,
    Sorry, let me rephrase my comment - Most Mormons I KNOW can't stand Harry Reid and will not and did not vote for him.

    Second,
    It is against Federal Law for a tax-exempt organization to participate in or intervene on behalf of a political campaign for any candidate running for public office. However, by Federal Law, tax-exempt organizations are allowed to attempt to influence legislation, as long as their attempts are not a substantial part of its activities. The LDS church was in no way violating its tax-exempt status by asking its members to write their representative encouraging a Yes vote for the Marriage Protection Ammendment.

    Third,
    I never said I didn't like Harry Reid only because he "votes against bills the LDS church is in favor of". I don't like Harry Reid because I don't like anything he stands for - Energy, War, Illegal Immigration, Social Security, etc.

    Perhaps the Church is keeping silent so they don't lose their tax-exempt status. The Church very rarely comes and openly endorses or opposes a certain piece of legislation. It doesn't need to have a political view on everything.

    Just because someone has a different view than you doesn't mean their mind is closed.


    Report abuse

    Mark Dreslin wrote on July 24, 2008 10:37 PM: Who is Joe.
    I recently discovered the comment section of the RJ online. I like to read the comments, but notice that there are several people that only comment with negative posts. I would request that we please stay on topic and avoid all of this negative energy.
    Sen. Ried was just on the news testifying before congress. He makes several points that are very valid regarding Polygamy, but why is this the topic buried behing the awful state of our economy? I suspect it is due to the upcoming election and his attempt to distance himself and the Democrats as far away from any topics that will hurt the chances for electing a Democratic president.
    Comments?


    Report abuse

    joe wrote on July 24, 2008 10:34 PM: "Get it right" wrote:

    "Joe... Dirty Harry is hardly a "pawn" for the Mormon church. Most Mormons can't stand him. He voted against the marriage ammendment act, which the Mormon church encouraged their members to vote for. As a devout mormon, I can't wait to see Reid out of office."

    Just a couple observations about your response:

    First, I'm glad to see you're so well aquainted with most Mormons that you know who they like and dislike.

    Second, I realize that the LDS church encouraged everyone to vote for the marriage ammendment act. The problem with them doing this is that it is a violation of federal law for them to promote political agendas because the LDS church has a "tax exempt" status.

    Third, you indicate that Reid votes aginst bills the LDS church is in favor of and that is why you dislike him? So are you saying that the LDS church is against this anti-polygamy bill Reid has proposed then? We can only assume because the LDS church is keeping silent on this matter.

    If the LDS church was truly against polygamy then they should be throwing their total support towards Reid's bill. The LDS church has proven in the past they can become involved with and support and fight political issues. This is the perfect opportunity for the LDS church to try and shake the 800 pound polygamist gorilla from their backs, but they remain silent, giving only a generalized, watered-down statement against women and child abuse. Why? Is it because they know if they do support it they deny their own official doctrine and have to accept the fact that Joseph Smith and several early church leaders were criminals?

    Just trying to open up some minds and ask questions......something LDS church leaders are usually against their followers doing.


    Report abuse

    Forest Gump wrote on July 24, 2008 10:17 PM: Joe the bigot.
    Please leave Joe alone, once again he has proven that he is the smartest man alive.


    Report abuse

    joe wrote on July 24, 2008 10:02 PM: "joe the bigot", go ahead with the personal attacks, it's what alot of Mormon defenders do when they're faced with uncomfortable true facts about their church. Attack the messenger, but ignore the message.

    So tell me "joe the bigot" which facts I presented about Joseph Smith that were not true? If you have studied church history you know I am telling the truth about Smith's plural marriages and teenage wives.

    My credibility comes directly from the Mormon church's own history (History of the Church by Joseph Smith - sold at Deseret Bookstore for $59.95) and the official LDS church website mormon.org. On mormon.org look up the geneology of Joseph Smith and see the ages of his wives for yourself. Also take a look at Brigham Young's Journal of Discourses, interesting prophetic revelations by Young stating NO man can enter heaven without first being a polygamist here on Earth.

    I have always provided the avenues for others to research what I have written and learn the truth for themselves. What have you provided "joe the bigot" other than personal attacks and childish prom rejection comments? You obviously have an axe to grind with anyone presenting the truth about Joseph Smith and his polygamist ways, and your attacks on me without presenting any legitimate responses to the facts I have stated lacks any credibility on your part.

    One last thing, does anybody truly believe that the most powerful Mormon politician in the world Harry Reid failed to consult with the Mormon church leaders before presenting this bill? A bill which addresses probably the most controversial issue in church doctrine and history?


    Report abuse

    joe the bigot wrote on July 24, 2008 08:03 PM: joe,

    Did the mormon girl turn you down when you asked her to prom or something? You obviously have an axe to grind with the mormon church, and your obvious bias destroys any credibility you have.


    Report abuse

    Moderator wrote on July 24, 2008 06:12 PM: It would be interesting to see what other bills are being proposed by the Senator. I wish they would pass a bill not allowing any more bills that are already covered by an existing bill. The bill for all these bills have got to be costing us all a fortune.


    Read All Comments