Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


CAMPAIGN ISSUE: Titus offers energy fixes

Plan includes offshore drilling




State Sen. Dina Titus, D-Las Vegas, summed up her package of energy proposals Monday as "help now, bridge the gap and plan for the future."

Titus, who is running for Congress, unveiled the first policy paper of her campaign at a service station in Henderson, saying gasoline prices are the number one issue she hears about on the trail.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields




  • Congress needs to act, she said, because while the price of gasoline has decreased in recent weeks, "It hasn't come down enough, it fluctuates with the political winds and there's nothing in place to ensure it'll go down further and stay down."

    Titus proposed a set of short-, medium- and long-term fixes including releasing oil from the federal Strategic Petroleum Reserve, allowing oil drilling off the coasts of states that agree to it and repealing some tax breaks for oil companies.

    Titus' stance on offshore drilling is at odds with many in her party, including Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, who has called it a political gimmick that is unlikely to help lower gas prices, and environmentalists who say more drilling will lead to more oil spills that hurt coastal ecosystems.

    Titus said she sees it as a matter of states' rights. "This decision is something that needs to be made and regulated by the states, not stuck in Congress," she said.

    And she said environmental concerns have abated as techniques have improved. "The technology is much better today than it ever has been for offshore drilling, and I would support it with some conditions," she said.

    Under her plan, in addition to states' consent, offshore drilling could only occur if the oil thereby produced was earmarked for sale in the United States and some royalties from offshore drilling went toward development of renewable energy.

    A spokesman for the Republican incumbent Titus is challenging, Rep. Jon Porter, accused Titus of changing her position on offshore drilling, which Porter also supports.

    Titus in 2007 voted against a resolution in the state Senate that called on President Bush to repeal the executive ban on offshore drilling. She had proposed an unsuccessful amendment to the resolution that would have replaced its references to coastal exploration with language about renewable energy.

    "Senator Titus has failed to articulate a consistent message for Nevada's energy future," Porter spokesman Matt Leffingwell said. "In 2007, she had an opportunity to take a clear position on offshore drilling."

    Titus said she didn't think it was the Nevada Legislature's "role to get involved" in the drilling issue. She said she voted against the 2007 resolution because "there were none of those qualifiers I mentioned, just carte blanche to Congress."

    In addition to offshore drilling, Porter and Titus are in agreement on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which Titus said could have an immediate impact on oil prices. The congressman voted to release some of its oil last week.

    Leffingwell said Monday he didn't know Porter's positions on cracking down on oil futures speculation or removing tariffs on Brazilian ethanol, two more proposals Titus advocates. Porter has supported the tax breaks for oil companies that Titus decries, viewing them as incentives for domestic energy production.

    Porter wants Congress to take a multi-pronged approach to what he sees as an energy crisis, his spokesman said. "The congressman has supported an all-of-the-above approach and continues to work across party lines to find solutions and reduce the price at the pump."

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 19 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Howard wrote on July 29, 2008 04:45 PM: Does anyone believe that she would vote the opposite of Nancy Pelosi on anything? Dina is only going to say whatever it takes to get elected and then vote whatever way Nancy tells her too.


    Report abuse

    SMONAB wrote on July 29, 2008 02:37 PM: I love how Dina Titus is pretending to give a darn about our state and our money, when all she really cares about is her career as a politician. What has she done productively as her many years as a politician here in the Nevada Senate? She has done nothing but petty party politics, and has only sought for power. And I can personally say this from experience because I used to work up in Carson City during legislative session! She does not care about her constituants and will not be an affective member of congress. I have personally met Jon Porter as well, and he is an outstanding man and someone who is genuinely concerned for the people of Nevada. My vote is going to someone that I know will do what's best for us, Jon Porter.


    Report abuse

    Danny wrote on July 29, 2008 02:18 PM: Titus is VERY supportive of renewables!

    Come on down to the Solar NV group meetings and learn...matter of fact, Titus just addressed the group last week.

    You want to talk about Enron debacle? Better read the minutes of the Colorado River Commission and how Senator Beers and Senator Warren Hardy are involved!


    Report abuse

    What's her track record? wrote on July 29, 2008 01:50 PM: Just tell me what Titus's role in the Nevada Legislature:
    1.Was in the energy deregulation, a few years back, that threw this state into years of recovery after the Enron dibolical?

    2.Most recently, what was her role in the recending the tax rebate for large building projects encorporating green energy resources in their plans?

    I think we will then know if she's flying a green freak flag, or genuinely committed to a do-able program.


    Report abuse

    muah wrote on July 29, 2008 11:31 AM: I agree that oil drilling should be a states' rights issue. She's got cojones points from me for that one.

    Strategic reserve is exactly that...strategic...meaning let's keep that for a true emergency, like, say, massive war in the Persian Gulf. Nobody likes getting caught with their junk flying in the open air.

    Continue with tax subsidies for "energy" companies with stipulations saying X amount of public money needs to be spent developing, refingin, and implementing alternaive enrgy sources. There's got to be a way to do that legislatively so no hanky-panky is played with our money. These companies have a large pool of overeducated engineers and scientists...put them to good use, pay them well, make it profitable, and make it CRYSTAL CLEAR that justice will be dealt swiftly to anyone falling outside those parameters. No white-collar prison, but national security/treason type of justice.

    Petrochemicals should only be used as standby/backup for power generation. The alternative technologies exist now...use them, or surrender your subsidies!

    Ain't gonna be easy, but these are some ideas. Of course getting politicians out of the pockets of special interests is paraamount in taking these first steps. Replacing all incumbents regularly is a start. "Politician" was not a career I recall from career day in school.


    Report abuse

    sid wrote on July 29, 2008 10:01 AM: areas of oil...eia

    usareasofoilamount


    Report abuse

    Sid wrote on July 29, 2008 10:00 AM: MMS offers this data....the amounts listed are not "economically recoverable amounts" but estimated gross amounts....

    mmsdata


    Report abuse

    Sid wrote on July 29, 2008 09:56 AM: For those who think there is no drilling allowed off the coast of Alaska, here is the government data base for every lease!

    drillinginalaska


    Report abuse

    Sid wrote on July 29, 2008 09:53 AM: ths,

    In my earlier post where I wrote 3bn it should be 30bn.

    Hey! EIA at this link says US has proven reserves of only 20,972,000,000 barrels. I saw MMS website list 56bn bbl.

    usgovtdocs

    Here is the data broken down by area;
    areasofusoil

    Colorado shale fields are not oil fields they are oily rocks...Shell Oil in 2008 report says it will be the middle of next decade before they can even determine if recovery is of oil shale is commercially feasible!

    And one last EIA page showing proven reserves are down 3.6% 2007 versus 2006.
    eia


    Report abuse

    ths wrote on July 29, 2008 09:26 AM: Sid the 60 billion is the newly discovered amount in Alaska, not including the oil shell fields of Colorado, off shore sites in Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf.



    Why no one does anything is because it is easier to stick your head in the sand then to change.



    San Francisco has tax rebates by the city, then the state, then the federal government and then by the power company that make solar cost affective for almost every one in the region to do it.





    But then we are giving tax dollars out, but it is only tax dollars that spur a revolution and we need to grab it today.



    Spend now to save in the long run. It is like removing grass costs more now then paying the water bill but will save over time.



    Return on Investment.


    Read All Comments