Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


Panel backs power plants

Climate committee takes gradual tack

CARSON CITY -- A governor-appointed panel Tuesday called for energy policy changes that aim to clean up Nevada's air without jeopardizing the construction of more power plants in the state.

The Nevada Climate Change Advisory Committee formally released the final version of its 189-page report in a presentation to Gov. Jim Gibbons.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas
  • DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Halverson removed from bench



  • Committee members see a future Nevada with higher temperatures, less precipitation, more wildfires and a generally less desirable climate.

    But they did not recommend policy changes that would require an immediate reduction of greenhouse gas emissions thought by some scientists to be the main cause of global warming.

    Instead, the committee emphasized that greenhouse gas emissions have decreased on a per capita basis since 1994 and that the state should adopt a policy to reduce the intensity of the emissions.

    Under that scenario, power generation facilities could be constructed if their pollution emissions fall below what is released by existing facilities on a per unit basis. Older plants that produce high levels of pollution then could be closed.

    "This provision makes the GHG (greenhouse gases) targets reachable by all parties currently planning to build facilities in Nevada, while maintaining the responsibility to offset GHG emissions and encouraging the development of renewable resources," the report states.

    Three companies, including the parent company of Nevada Power Co., want to build coal-fired power plants in White Pine and Lincoln counties that would produce nearly 4,000 megawatts of electricity.

    The plants would send 48 million tons of carbon dioxide into the air during their 75-year expected lifetimes.

    Under a memorandum of understanding with the state, the plants do not have to capture carbon emissions until capture technology becomes available at a reasonable price.

    After the meeting, Gibbons said he would not commit to supporting any of the dozens of recommendations until he has time to review and assess their effect.

    One recommendation calls for the establishment of a permanent committee on climate change. Gibbons appointed members of the climate change committee in April 2007. Members include county air quality officials, utility executives and regulators and conservation representatives.

    Gibbons said his goal is not to have more power plants burning fossil fuels and selling electricity to other states, but to develop renewable-energy facilities and close older plants that spew out dirty emissions.

    "My goal is to make Nevada a greener state, energy-wise," said Gibbons, adding that he wants to export renewable energy to other states, not electricity from fossil fuel-burning plants.

    Gibbons said he could support legislation, if it did not run afoul of the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution, that states the main beneficiary of new energy resources would be the citizens of Nevada. The committee is calling for a law that requires companies to prove new plants are needed to "ensure reliable utility service to customers in this state."

    Gibbons said the state does not have a lot of financial resources to start many of the panel's recommendations.

    That disturbed former Public Utilities Commissioner Steve Wiel, state representative of the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project.

    "We take serious offense with your total lack of commitment," Wiel said in a letter to Gibbons. "You apparently are unwilling to spend the money it will take or to mobilize the government agencies, business and citizens of Nevada."

    Without a commitment from state government, Wiel said, "there is clearly no hope" for the state to minimize the effects of climate change.

    Wiel called for Nevada to set energy efficiency goals that reduce the need for additional electricity and cut greenhouse gas emissions.

    He said that the governors of Arizona and Colorado have started plans to reduce total greenhouse emissions. Like Nevada, they are growing states, Wiel said. Colorado's plan calls for a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gases by 2020.

    Committee member Jo Ann Kelly, a member of the Public Utilities Commission, said power plants that emit lower levels of pollutants have been opened in Nevada in the past five years. But she said she could not give a date when total greenhouse gas emissions will start to drop.

    "We are a growing state. We are adding megawatts to our portfolio," she said. "We will do our share to clean up the environment, but we still have to account for the fact that we are growing."

    If the power plants in White Pine County are built, Kelly said, then Nevada Power could close its Reid Gardner plant in Moapa Valley.

    The Environmental Integrity Project last year identified Reid Gardner as the dirtiest power plant in the nation.

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.



    Leave Your Comment 10 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    R-J Propaganda wrote on July 30, 2008 10:04 PM: "But they did not recommend policy changes that would require an immediate reduction of greenhouse gas emissions thought by some scientists to be the main cause of global warming."

    Were that not shameless R-J propaganda, it might have read more like this:

    "But they did not recommend policy changes that would require an immediate reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (BELIEVED BY THE VAST PREPONDERANCE, REPEAT, BELIEVED BY THE VAST PREPONDERANCE OF CLIMATE SCIENTISTS) to be the main cause of global warming."


    michaele wrote on July 30, 2008 07:18 PM: having lived in nevada from 1980 till 2006 i still don't understand why they won't use solar and wind power ?


    RANDY wrote on July 30, 2008 11:53 AM: WHAT? One recommendation calls for the establishment of a permanent committee on climate change. WHY? WILL THIS COST THE TAX PAYERS MONEY? IT WON'T CHANGE A THING. Members include county air quality officials, utility executives and regulators and conservation representatives. WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO? TALK ABOUT THE WEATHER? WORRY ABOUT THINGS THEY CANNOT CHANGE? WE NEED POWER. CHEAP POWER.


    muah wrote on July 30, 2008 10:01 AM: "We take serious offense with your total lack of commitment," Wiel said in a letter to Gibbons. "You apparently are unwilling to spend the [taxpayers'] money..." (emphasis added for effect)


    Where has this guy been? Does he know about the fiscal situation here in the state and elsewhere???


    Bonni wrote on July 30, 2008 08:30 AM: "Under a memorandum of understanding with the state, the plants do not have to capture carbon emissions until capture technology becomes available at a reasonable price."

    If this technology is available now, even though expensive, why wait to install it? The cost will only go up! What a loophole you have opened!


    Jeff wrote on July 30, 2008 08:29 AM: While you are likely right Wade, we must be constructive on this topic or you risk sounding just as crazy as the save the Earth wackos. What's really funny is that no matter what man can possibly ever do to the Earth, we can never save it. In about 4 billion years, the Sun will engulf the Earth as it enters its red-giant phase and the Earth will disintegrate killing everything on it. What these wackos want is for nothing to ever change, but they fail to realize that the Earth has been changing non-stop since its creation and will do so til its end.


    jerry perkins wrote on July 30, 2008 08:25 AM: if it will help keep power prices low go for it!!!


    Crow wrote on July 30, 2008 08:04 AM: Dear Wade;

    Please address the CO2 level that currently exist as it relates to the historical know norm over the past 700,000 years.

    Did your research find any period in earth history where C02 levels equalled or exceeded those in the atmoshpere today?


    Russ wrote on July 30, 2008 07:15 AM: Wade, crawl from under rock and educate yourself before making stupid, illiterate and uneducated responses. Duhhh!!!


    Wade Barnes wrote on July 30, 2008 06:17 AM: You're all nuts who believe man is causing global warming. Mother Nature is causing it and always has and always will. Give it up. She also caused the ice age. If we were here then you whackos would have tried to warm the earth. Duhhh!!!