Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

sponsored by
News


Charges against judge to be heard

Discipline panel to hold open hearing into Halverson case




District Judge Elizabeth Halverson barely had time to get comfortable when she took the bench in January 2007 before an onslaught of accusations surfaced about her behavior.

She was accused of improperly communicating with jurors, treating her bailiff like a personal slave and falling asleep on the bench.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • Study urges Nevada and nine other states to take care in handling economy
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • Police serve search warrant at Hell's Angels clubhouse
  • Police serve search warrant at Hell's Angels clubhouse
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • Cada wins World Series of Poker championship
  • Cada wins World Series of Poker championship
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying




  • A May 2007 report said that she ordered her bailiff, Johnny Jordan, to rub her feet and give her back massages, clean her floor and cover her with blankets when she lay down.

    The report said that she was openly hostile to her staff, calling her court clerk the "evil one," and that she couldn't adequately conduct criminal trials.

    Halverson's criminal caseload was stripped from her, and she was temporarily barred from the Regional Justice Center for bringing personal bodyguards into the courthouse.

    The Nevada Judicial Discipline Commission suspended Halverson, 50, in July 2007, and she has remained off the bench, with her $130,000 annual pay, ever since.

    Starting today, the commission is scheduled to hold an open hearing that will decide Halverson's fate. The commission considers judges innocent until proved guilty.

    Commission Executive Director David Sarnowski declined to comment last week on the case.

    Halverson denied the charges against her, saying they might have been motivated by personal grievances and not her work.

    "I'm going to clear my name," she said in an recent interview. She is expected to represent herself during the hearing with co-counsel.

    Halverson is running for re-election to Department 23. She is being challenged by Family Court Judge Stefany Miley and attorney Jason Landess.

    Despite being off the bench for a year, Halverson said she has been busy working with attorneys to fight the accusations.

    During the past year, she has challenged a defamation lawsuit filed against her by a former judicial executive assistant, Ileen Spoor, whom Halverson accused of fixing tickets.

    Halverson also sought to bypass the 2008 election, arguing that her two-year term is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled against her in July.

    Halverson said that when she visits the grocery store or goes to the movies, strangers come up to her and offer their support. They admire her for fighting, she said.

    The judge said the accusations against her stem in part from her contentious relationship with Chief District Judge Kathy Hardcastle.

    Before being elected, Halverson served as a law clerk for nine years in District Court but was fired in 2004 by Hardcastle, who cited the temporary nature of the position.

    Halverson ran against Hardcastle's then-husband, former Family Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle, for his Family Court seat but lost the election.

    "This has never been about anything other than her behavior," Hardcastle said.

    If Halverson is found to have committed wrongdoing, she could get no punishment or get a slap on the wrist. The seven Judicial Discipline Commission members also could permanently remove her from the bench.

    The hearing will be similar to a trial, but it is not a criminal proceeding. It is expected to last a week, with multiple witnesses expected to be called.

    While removing judges from the bench is rare, the commission has done so.

    In 1987, it kicked District Judge Paul Goldman off the bench after it found him guilty of judicial misconduct. Goldman ordered the jailing of a Las Vegas police commander who did not return his phone calls to the judge fast enough. He also jailed an 87-year-old woman who refused to testify against her son.

    In 1995, the Judicial Discipline Commission ousted North Las Vegas Municipal Court Judge Gary Davis.

    Davis was accused of borrowing money from court employees, endorsing political candidates and using court employees to run personal errands.

    The commission also removed Family Court Judge Fran Fine from the bench in 1998 for having ex-parte conversations, or conversations involving only one side of a case.

    She also was accused of appointing a cousin as a mediator without disclosing the relationship.

    Halverson, however, believes she will prevail. While the charges against her sound bizarre, she said, they are not what the media are making them out to be.

    She said her bailiff never rubbed her feet but often had put slippers or her shoes onto her feet voluntarily.

    She said she never slept on the bench but had a hypoglycemic issue that made her dizzy when she forgot to eat because of her busy schedule.

    While Halverson admitted she ate dinner with jurors, she said that the dinner was served in the courthouse and that they never discussed the case before the jury.

    Despite the allegations and legal struggles, Halverson said she still wants to serve as a judge.

    "It's a very dysfunctional family," she said. "But it's worth it."

    Contact reporter David Kihara at dkihara@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-1039.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 49 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Re-Elect Judge Mosely wrote on August 04, 2008 11:29 PM: If a morbidly obese woman with a life threatening eating disorder and serious oxygen deficit (that could very well have diminished her judgment, as it may still be doing) can get elected to the bench, then anyone, and I mean anyone, can become a judge in Southern Nevada.

    Donald Moseley: there IS hope for your re-election!


    Report abuse

    joe wrote on August 04, 2008 11:15 PM: Thank you "Mike R.", I see my common sense is finally bringing you to the dark side.


    Report abuse

    ..temujin ... khan of the yakka mongols ... wrote on August 04, 2008 10:23 PM:
    Welllll,
    If she is removed from her office it's gonna take ten bailiffs, a gang of ironworkers, lots of rigging gear,and a pretty stout crane to get her out of the building


    Report abuse

    mikelvnv wrote on August 04, 2008 09:01 PM: I hope she gets to stay on. The comedic value alone is worth her weight in gold. And that's a lot of gold.


    Report abuse

    Phyllis wrote on August 04, 2008 08:46 PM: I do not know too much about this lady's courtroom behavior, but I have seen her in public occasions and I did not feel that she behaved with propriety. At a dance I was attending she made sure that everyone knew she was there and that she was running for judge - this was the last election.


    Report abuse

    Boo-Hoo wrote on August 04, 2008 07:30 PM: We could resolve the wild horse problem. Simply feed them to Halverson. While you're at it, cut her $130,000 wage off so she can stop buying Twinkies and Ho-Hos.


    Report abuse

    madgie wrote on August 04, 2008 06:28 PM: I am so tired of hearing about what the tax payers are paying Halverson!

    I never hear a word about how much the county and state pay for a good number of Judges when they go on their annual retreats. Of course not local retreats. Ask Hardcastle how many times she has been to Hiwaii? And how long she was three for? And who paid for her trip there and back?

    Now ask yourself what exactly are they doing on these retreats. Do you think there is some foot massaging going on there?

    In fact pubilize all the Judges names that have attended these annual retreats. And include their expense reports.

    Let's see Jane why don't you do your homework!


    Report abuse

    John G wrote on August 04, 2008 06:02 PM: As an outsider looking in (attorney living and practicing in Florida) I have followed the Judge Halverson matter with some interest. While her disability and appearance have made the case more "newsworthy" for the national media, I applaud Nevada for recognizing that her disability is neither a reason to indict nor a defense to the accusations. The commission hearing appears to focus on the allegations and the testimony and that, and that alone, will dictate the commission's decision. This matter will be concluded in the proper forum, and not in the press. Of course, as is the case in any democracy, the citizens will have the final word at the polls.


    Report abuse

    Jan B wrote on August 04, 2008 04:44 PM: This woman is getting paid $130,000 a year for doing nothing. We taxpayers in the meantime, desperately cling to our jobs. If she is so ill she can't stay awake during court sessions and must lay down during breaks, the woman should be taking disability and not determining what will happen to other's lives when she isn't aware enough to even keep track of the case.


    Report abuse

    Vic wrote on August 04, 2008 04:13 PM: I'm with oldlawdawg and Nancy. Halverson has come up with any/every excuse to explain away her actions. She has proclaimed herself the Joan Of Ark of the RJC. How many more smoke screens can she put up before she's out? Getting paid for doing nothing and on our dime....All of you posters that cry outrage and corruption, if you are so fed up with the "corruption", why are so many Judges running unopposed? Why isn't anyone running agianst them? All I read about is Hardcastle's vendetta on these comment sections about Halverson, yet Hardcastle ran unopposed. Get Halverson out! In the meantime, put up or shut up. I don't see anyone coming forward to run against Hardcastle, just complain about her. If you want to fix the system, be a part of the change or deal with it.


    Read All Comments