Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


Correction on 08/06/08 -- The name of independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader was misspelled in a headline on Page 2B of Tuesday’s Review-Journal.

Need to run still exists, Nader says

Activist outlines corporate threat



Photo by Duane Prokop/Review-Journal

Ralph Nader is running for president again, just like he did last time and the time before.

The message has not changed, but Nader, who was in Las Vegas on Monday for a news conference and luncheon with supporters, believes his anti-corporate creed still needs a champion.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas
  • DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Halverson removed from bench



  • And so the 74-year-old activist doggedly continues trying to get the word out.

    "We have many redirections, solutions and agendas that are ignored by John McCain and Barack Obama," Nader said, reciting in a near-monotone. "We're the ones who are for single-payer (health care). ... We believe in a living wage, which tens of millions of workers in this country do not have. ... We believe that there should be a six-month deadline for withdrawal of all U.S. military and corporate forces in Iraq."

    The group of about 15 people who came to see Nader at McCormick & Schmick's, the Las Vegas location of a national seafood restaurant chain, applauded.

    Nader, a pioneering consumer advocate who rose to prominence crusading for car safety in the 1960s, is still defending himself from the charge that his 2000 presidential campaign, on the Green Party ticket, attracted voters who otherwise would have chosen then-Democratic nominee Al Gore and thus cost Gore the election to President Bush. Nader essentially has said it is on Gore for not getting those votes.

    Undaunted by the anger of many on the left especially, Nader ran again in 2004, this time as an independent candidate, and received three-tenths of 1 percent of the national vote, down from 2.74 percent in 2000. In Nevada, Nader got 2.5 percent in 2000 and 0.6 percent in 2004.

    This year, Nader hopes to be on more ballots than he was in 2004, when legal challenges in many states thwarted his ballot access. In Nevada, his supporters have collected more than 12,000 signatures, and the secretary of state's office has approved him to be on the general election ballot in November.

    "By early September, we will be on 45 state ballots," Nader said Monday.

    As with Bush and Gore or Bush and 2004 Democratic nominee John Kerry, Nader said this year's Democratic and Republican choices, Obama and McCain, are unacceptable.

    "Both John McCain and Barack Obama are corporate candidates," he said. "They overwhelmingly vote the corporate policy line."

    Obama, he said, has supported the credit card industry and supports caps on medical malpractice damages, and "he has had a mediocre Senate career when it comes to associating himself with the injustices, deprivations and poverty of the lower 100 million Americans on the income scale."

    McCain, he said, "who had a sort of independent streak, decided about six months ago that he was going to become a clone of King George the Fourth" and reversed his former stands against tax cuts for the wealthy and against offshore drilling.

    "So you can see the pull of corporate power on both of these candidates," he said. "As they get closer to the vote of the people, they are standing with the power and greed of corporations."

    Nader's sense that voters ought to recognize that he is right and gravitate to him rather than to the major parties and their hundreds of millions of dollars in candidate marketing can turn to scolding. The current state of the campaign, he said, is "a reflection on citizens who don't take enough time and put enough energy into their political and civic activities."

    "If we don't put more time into our civic and political activities, these giant corporations will tear the heart and soul out of America, as they are doing on the installment plan. They have no allegiance to our country (but) to control it or abandon its industries and jobs," he said.

    Political expert Larry Sabato, director of the Institute for Politics at the University of Virginia, said Nader, once an admirable figure, has come to illustrate that "there really is such a thing as overstaying your welcome."

    He predicted that Nader will get even fewer votes this year than he did in 2004, as most voters have lost patience with his perpetual candidacy.

    One of Nader's fans at Monday's luncheon, 27-year-old limo driver Mike Hull, said he admired Nader for his long record of activism and for presenting "a different viewpoint, outside the two-party system."

    But Hull said he wasn't sure he would vote for Nader: He didn't want to throw his vote away.

    "I know how morally corrupt it sounds, but honestly, I want to see how well he does."

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.



    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    4 nonduopoly wrote on August 05, 2008 09:52 PM: Why do we accept only two "major" parties to "lead" us? "We the people" pay more in taxes to offset corporate welfare, a bloated defense per retired military officers and salaries of people from corporations leading government agencies. We allow these two parties to be controlled by corportations. Thus millions without health care (or subsidised or costly or not enough coverage), a levee which should have been fixed, 935+ lies leading us to war, zero impeachment mandated by "our" constitution, global warming, absurd acceptance of nafta and the wto, the "un" partiot act, media monopoly, campaign contributions so we can live of, by and for those with the means to influence. Legislation "for the people" does not even make it out of committee, while legislation for those with the means to influence passes. Supreme court justices selected based mainly on Roe v. Wade.
    Compared to Mr. Nader's accomplishments, BEFORE the takeover the difference should be obvious. But the media promotes distortion, while not providing truth (and time) in reporting about the above issues. Mr. Nader's record screams of, by and for the people. Like our founding fathers intended and many gave their lives fighting for.
    "News" entertainers and political operatives use of spin, costly negative sound bites and labels to blur the truth, do not change what is real.
    Corporate media obviously do not want Mr. Nader on what use to be the 'publics' airwaves. We also have the two party controlled Presidential debate fiasco keeping opposing voices from being heard. If this is what Mr. Sabato and some of those who submitted comments are ok with, they are not alone in accepting these greater evils, because it appears we will continue down the same path.


    fluffy wrote on August 05, 2008 12:07 PM: Neither of the "presumed" nominee morons are getting my vote.

    2008...Year of the Nader BOMB!!!!


    scottywrangler wrote on August 05, 2008 08:56 AM: Nadar? Is that pronounced like Gaydar? Proofreading might be a good start!


    Humorless Narcissist wrote on August 05, 2008 07:51 AM: Yes, he's done good work; however, as a basically humorless narcissist, Ralph Nader would have a hard time even getting elected to the office of dog catcher.


    SteveK wrote on August 05, 2008 06:36 AM: Nader is a disgrace. He should be ashamed of himself for 2000 but instead his own psychosis convinces himself that he is somehow right to do what he does.


    GEORGE wrote on August 05, 2008 04:16 AM: Nader is one of eight other candidates who will be on the presidential ballot. They will be ignored by the media but they have a lot of interesting things to say.


    Wade Barnes wrote on August 05, 2008 03:51 AM: Question: How does one spell Idiot? Answer: Ralph Nader!!!