Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Thursday
Sep 2, 2010
Sunny
Sunny 85° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

sponsored by
News


Justice out-raises opponent in election

Gibbons reports more than $316,000 in contributions







CARSON CITY -- Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Gibbons has raised more than $316,000 for his re-election campaign in the past seven months, a report filed with the secretary of state's office shows.

His opponent in the general election, Las Vegas attorney Thomas Christensen, reported $10,500 in contributions, including a $600 loan to himself.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Wynn breaks with nightclub mogul after arrest with Hilton
  2. Two tourists killed, two hurt in crash in northern Arizona
  3. Two Metro officers charged in traffic death
  4. Executives support Wynn's Hilton ban
  5. Nighttime TV will always have Paris
  6. Former CSN official guilty of theft
  7. Rogers scorns schools officials
  8. 20-year-old who died at Lake Mohave identified as LV man
  9. Man dies after crash on Strip
  10. Claim against Heck resurfaces




The first round of reports from candidates and other elected officials were due Tuesday, but some can trickle in late as long as they have an Aug. 5 postmark.

Gibbons had 215 monetary contributions in excess of $100 totaling a little more than $314,000.

An additional $2,400 came in contributions of less than $100, according to the report dated Friday.

The reporting period is from Jan. 1 through July 31.

One contributor was Clark County Commissioner Bruce Woodbury, who gave Gibbons $300 on Feb. 23.

Gibbons and his colleagues recently ruled in a controversial case that Woodbury, a candidate for another term on the commission, could not run again because of term limits.

University Regent Steve Sisolak, who is running as a Democrat for Woodbury's County Commission seat, gave Gibbons $10,000 on Feb. 26.

The term limits challenge did not emerge until May.

Gibbons also reported having $58,000 in cash on hand before the start of the reporting period.

He reported spending a little more than $193,000 on his campaign.

Gibbons and Christensen will appear on the November general election ballot.

Before winning Seat D in the Supreme Court unopposed in 2002, Gibbons served as a judge in Clark County District Court. He first won election to the District Court bench in 1996.

By SEAN WHALEY

REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU

CARSON CITY -- Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Gibbons has raised more than $316,000 for his re-election campaign in the past seven months, a report filed with the secretary of state's office shows.

His opponent in the general election, Las Vegas attorney Thomas Christensen, reported only $10,500 in contributions, including a $600 loan to himself.

The first round of reports from candidates and other elected officials were due Tuesday, although some can trickle in late as long as they have an Aug. 5 postmark.

Gibbons had 215 monetary contributions in excess of $100 totaling just over $314,000. An additional $2,400 came in contributions of less than $100, according to the report dated Friday.

The reporting period is from Jan. 1 through July 31.

One contributor was Clark County Commissioner Bruce Woodbury, who gave Gibbons $300 on Feb. 23. Gibbons and his colleagues recently ruled in a controversial case that Woodbury, himself a candidate for another term on the commission, could not run again due to term limits.

University Regent Steve Sisolak, who is running as a Democrat for Woodbury's county commission seat, gave Gibbons $10,000 on Feb. 26.

The term limits challenge did not emerge until May.

Gibbons also reported having $58,000 in cash on hand prior to the start of the reporting period.

He reported spending just over $193,000 on his campaign.

Gibbons and Christensen will appear on the November general election ballot.

Before winning Seat D in the Supreme Court unopposed in 2002, Gibbons served as a judge in Clark County District Court. He first won election to the district court bench in 1996.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (9)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

politik wrote on August 06, 2008 02:05 PM: As much as it s*cks to vote for an ambulance chaser and the possibilities, incumbents need to go. Gibbons voted to scr%w Nevada voters on the Guinn v Nevada Legislature case; and now he wants the voters to forgive him and bend over again.
The corruption and conflicts of interest with the status quo has to be ended.
Gibbons et al has done nothing to enforce the indigent defense mandate order of Jan 4, 2008. These guys are worthless to the people and tax payers of Nevada.
How about we vote Gibbons out just to get rid of him, and once the ambulance chaser is elected, hold his feet to the fire and make him accountable.
This $314,000 smells like special interests who want to rape Nevada like the Cherry donations.


Report abuse

Jerrae wrote on August 06, 2008 08:51 AM: If the money flows to the more qualified and respected candidate than this is proof that is does. Tom Christensen, a long time resident and ambulance chaser and has been (in my opinion) an abuser of the system. Based on personal experience, he would not be a good judge, he abuses the system for his benefit. We need a Supreme Court judge that is repected and has experience presenting cases in the Supreme Court. A vote for Christensen would open the door for his fellow personal-injury attorneys and only congest an already overburdened system.




Report abuse

Rachel wrote on August 06, 2008 08:17 AM: wildbill,
did brian scroggins give any money?!


Report abuse

Good ole boys wrote on August 06, 2008 07:56 AM: Time to replace the good ole boys and girls known as the supremes. Look at some of Gibbons rulings you will want him out. Start with the Guinn tax ruling. Gibbons needs to go.


Report abuse

Vote Gibbons out wrote on August 06, 2008 07:52 AM: The campaign contributions are nothing more than street tax to ensure that the gang will still be in power.

Time for Gibbons to be replaced.


Report abuse

wildbill wrote on August 06, 2008 07:16 AM: Timing is everything....
Woodbury gave $300 on 2/23
Sisolak gave $10,000 on 2/26
Woodbury can no longer run.
Why did Sisolak give him so much if he knew the term limit law was good enough to make things easier for him? Maybe for future considerations?
Hey Steve, what happens if WE decide not to vote for either of you 2?


Report abuse

SteveF8 wrote on August 06, 2008 06:32 AM: Gibbons is one of the ones who were on the bench, ignored the voters, and straddled the taxpayers with the largest tax increase in Nevada history. He needs to go to show the other "justices" that we are the ones they are supposed to be supporting; not special interest groups.


Report abuse

b wrote on August 06, 2008 05:27 AM: Hope the voters are paying attention, will dump Gibbons. Another perfect example of why we absolutely have to get rid of our corrupt judges, get justice back in Nevada


Report abuse

NN wrote on August 06, 2008 04:45 AM: No wonder we have such lousy judges. Its the same ones always being elected. No one challenge's them for the seat.

Wonder how many judges ran unopposed this time and got re-elected over and over and over again.

And what idiots in Nevada would give thousands of dollars to a re-election campaign that will end up in someones pocket.

Nevada is a corrupt state filled with cops and judges abusing their power and authority to make money in their own pockets.

Wake up voters. They are stealing your money. Where are the TERM Limits?????