Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


CITYCENTER CONSTRUCTION SITE: Safety issues raised

U.S., state safety regulations lack specificity










Several construction workers recently were observed drinking alcohol at nearby bars before they entered the CityCenter job site, a violation of company rules set by the general contractor.

Surprisingly, there are no state or local regulations or laws prohibiting a worker who has consumed alcohol from going to work on a construction site, state and local officials told the Review-Journal after a reporter and photographer observed 10 construction workers drinking and then returning to the job site of the massive $9.2 billion MGM Mirage project.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • The significance of the issue is raised because of the 12 construction-related deaths that have occurred at Strip construction sites in the past 18 months, but the Clark County coroner's office and the Nevada Office of Safety and Health Administration refused to say whether any of the deaths were linked to alcohol or drug use, citing privacy concerns.

    The Review-Journal began investigating the matter after receiving letters to the editor reporting that construction workers were seen drinking near the job site, which employs about 7,700 workers operating shifts around the clock.

    One letter, from a tourist from the East Coast, said he, his wife and a couple of friends observed construction workers drinking at the bar outside the Monte Carlo sports book in May.

    The tourist, who asked that his name be withheld because he is a regular visitor to the city, said three to seven workers were at the bar early each morning during his five-day stay, drinking and talking about the work day ahead.

    "It was very obvious these guys were on a first-name basis with the bartenders," he said on the phone. He described the workers' clothes as clean, suggesting they had not been to the construction site yet.

    Officials from Perini Building Co., the project's general contractor, on Tuesday expressed shock after being shown photographs and video of some of the workers observed by the Review-Journal. A total of 10 workers were seen drinking, and six of them were photographed walking onto the job site.

    "It's real simple: We have a zero tolerance policy," said Pat Hubbs, executive vice president of field operations for Perini. "If they consume any alcohol and go on site, it's grounds for termination."

    Hubbs called the workers' actions intolerable and emphasized that anyone entering the job site after consuming alcohol -- even if they are just walking through the job site to get to their cars -- is in violation of policies set by the construction company, its subcontractors and the unions.

    While acknowledging that "this type of behavior has been encountered on our Las Vegas construction projects in the past," Perini said in a statement Tuesday that it is taking the newspaper's "allegations seriously" and will investigate the matter.

    "We rely on trades to provide us with responsible, well-trained professionals. ... If we determine any of our policies were violated, we will take immediate and appropriate action," the statement read.

    The Review-Journal did not approach or attempt to contact the workers involved.

    Perini met with trade subcontractors Wednesday in an effort to identify and investigate the actions of individuals seen in the photographs.

    "We have secured the full support of the unions in assisting us in this process and expected termination of the individuals who can be identified," Doug Mure, Perini Corp.'s vice president of human resources and risk management, said in a statement Wednesday.

    Also present when the Review-Journal presented the photos and its findings Tuesday was Perini Chairman and CEO Craig Shaw and a representative from MGM Mirage. Representatives from the unions working on the project were not present Tuesday but were told about the findings by the newspaper.

    In a statement released late Tuesday, MGM Mirage said it "remains confident in Perini Building Company's ability to operate a safe and professional work site, enforce workplace regulations and take prompt disciplinary action when appropriate."

    "Perini senior management is investigating the allegations raised by the Review-Journal's report," Gordon Absher, MGM Mirage vice president of public affairs, said. "We expect their efforts will be met with cooperation from every union and subcontractor working at CityCenter."

    Other than being terminated by a company or its subcontractors, there are apparently no government regulatory prohibitions against workers showing up at a construction site intoxicated, according to safety and police officials.

    Because the construction sites are private property, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department spokesman Bill Castle said, DUI laws would not apply unless an intoxicated worker were to drive a vehicle or piece of construction equipment off the site.

    Federal safety regulations do not directly address the issue either. Federal OSHA spokesman Roger Gayman said there are no rules prohibiting construction workers from drinking, although an employer could be cited for safety violations under OSHA's general duty clause if certain criteria are met.

    The general duty clause requires employers to keep a work site free of "hazards" that could cause an injury or death if there is any feasible means to remove the threat.

    A spokeswoman for Nevada OSHA, which has come under criticism by union leaders for not properly enforcing safety regulations at CityCenter and other Strip job sites, said the agency also has no regulations regarding workers consuming drugs or alcohol.

    It is an "issue between the employer and employee," department spokeswoman Elisabeth Shurtleff said in an e-mail.

    "If an (Nevada) OSHA inspector had a suspicion that an employee was under the influence, they would notify the employer, particularly if the employee were operating equipment."

    That's not very reassuring to the Nevada Building and Construction Trades Council, which has accused the state agency of not exercising proper oversight and enforcement at local construction sites.

    "Our position with OSHA has been that we just haven't seen the type of attentiveness that we think this body needs to have," trade council spokesman Steve Redlinger said.

    "This is potentially, obviously very dangerous behavior, which has ramifications of hurting other people on the job site that have nothing to do with it except (they are) coming to work, trying to make an honest living playing by the rules," he said of the possibility that construction workers who have been drinking are on the job site.

    Managers of the project need to take action "before anyone gets hurt," the union official said.

    "If this behavior is as you explain it to me, it is unacceptable," Redlinger said. "These are issues that are handled in collective bargaining agreements with the employers. (These) actions are unacceptable and can't be tolerated."

    The construction companies, however, don't have a free hand.

    Perini's Shaw noted that although the contractors have policies in place to take action against workers if they have reason to suspect someone has been drinking -- say they smell alcohol on his breath -- they don't have the authority to randomly test construction workers for alcohol or drug use.

    The contractors do test workers who have been involved in a workplace accident.

    National statistics show that alcohol and drug use are major factors in construction site accidents.

    Alcohol, drugs or both were present in 19 percent of all workplace fatalities, according to a 1998 study of toxicology reports of work-related injuries conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Of the 593 toxicology reports submitted by 39 states including Nevada, alcohol was identified in 284 cases.

    The Clark County Coroner's Office denied a request by the Review-Journal for the toxicology reports of the 12 construction workers who died on Strip job sites since December 2006, citing the "confidentiality of medical information contained in such reports."

    The Nevada OSHA also cited confidentiality in refusing to reveal whether initial incident reports indicated whether drugs or alcohol were involved in any of the accidents, Shurtleff said.

    Safety issues at the Strip construction sites have been a major topic for union, safety, government and business officials for the past several months.

    The Nevada Building and Construction Trades Council led 17 affiliated unions out on a 24-hour strike of the CityCenter and nearby Cosmopolitan projects in June after negotiations on safety issues broke down between the unions, MGM Mirage and Perini.

    The dispute was resolved the next day when Perini agreed to several of the unions' demands, including conducting a safety assessment of the job site and allowing union and safety officials full access to the sites.

    The string of accidents and fatalities, including several construction crane accidents, also led government officials to set up a task force to take a look at what government, construction and union officials could be doing to improve safety at construction sites.

    Contact reporter Arnold M. Knightly at aknightly@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893.

    REVIEW-JOURNAL INVESTIGATION CONFIRMS TIPS

    After receiving letters from readers saying there were construction workers drinking outside the CityCenter job site, the Review-Journal sent a reporter and photographer to confirm.

    In one letter to a Review-Journal reporter, a tourist said that during a five-day trip to Las Vegas, he and his wife and friends saw several construction workers drinking at a bar inside the Monte Carlo every day about 5:30 a.m.

    "I'm no stranger to alcohol or construction work," the letter read. "I know these guys should never have been permitted to work."
    Review-Journal reporter Arnold Knightly made seven trips between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. to the Harley-Davidson Cafe and Zingers, an outdoor restaurant and bar at the Hawaiian Marketplace. People who appeared to be construction workers were seen drinking outside convenience stores, outside the marketplace and inside bars.

    The Review-Journal also visited the Monte Carlo but did not witness any workers drinking there.

    While the majority of the workers appeared to be off duty, the reporter and photographer observed a total of 10 workers on four separate occasions returning to the job site after drinking several cocktails. Six of them were photographed or videotaped entering the job site.

    On one occasion, on July 7, three workers were seen drinking a series of Jack Daniels and Pepsi or another unidentified mixed drink at the Harley-Davidson Cafe.

    One of the workers left the bar after drinking two drinks in approximately 30 minutes and returned to the construction site wearing a blue hard hat with "Local 433," the local iron workers union, stamped on the front.

    The two other men — one with a white helmet with the phrase "Safety Works Here" and the other wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the phrase "Safety Works" across the back — remained at the bar for 90 minutes and drank at least four more drinks before returning to the job site around 2 p.m.

    REVIEW-JOURNAL

    CLARK COUNTY CORONER'S OFFICE STATEMENT

    Whether any amounts of alcohol or drugs were present in any of the 12 construction deaths along the Strip is not public information, according to a response letter the Review-Journal received on July 24 from Clark County Coroner P. Michael Murphy.

    The newspaper requested copies of the toxicology reports for the 12 incidents on July 21.

    An earlier verbal request asking the office for a nonidentifying overview of the toxicology of the workers was also denied.

    Citing a state attorney general's opinion from June 1982, the coroner's letter said the office "does not release such reports to persons who are not legal next-of-kin to a decedent. The reason we do not disclose these reports is to maintain the confidentiality of medical information contained in such reports."

    The opinion's conclusion, which was written by then state Attorney General Richard Bryan, concedes that while "autopsy protocol is a public record," it is "not open to public inspection upon demand, because disclosure would be contrary to a strong public policy.

    "While cognizant that public inspection is the rule and secrecy the exception, we can ascertain no public interest in disclosure sufficient to outweigh the public policy of confidentiality of personal medical information," Bryan wrote a year before becoming governor, though the state law says any record not specifically declared confidential by law is available for public inspection.

    REVIEW-JOURNAL

    TEXT OF PERINI BUILDING CO.'S STATEMENT

    We take our commitment to the safety of our work sites very seriously. We have strict policies in place explicitly forbidding any employee, contractor or subcontractor from working on any project if they are in any way under the influence of alcohol. Substance abuse policies are in place to allow us to exercise the right to conduct "reasonable suspicion" testing for any site worker who we have reason to believe is under the influence of alcohol. Unfortunately, this type of behavior has been encountered on our Las Vegas construction projects in the past, and has resulted in employee termination.

    Obviously, individual responsibility plays a major safety role on any work site. This revelation is particularly abhorrent. It is incomprehensible how any responsible professional could engage in behavior that places not only his own life in jeopardy but the lives and safety of his fellow union members as well.

    We take the Review-Journal's allegations seriously and we are investigating this matter. We rely on the trades to provide us with responsible, well-trained professionals. We have reached out to the union officials to assist us in this investigation. If we determine any of our policies were violated, we will take immediate and appropriate action.

    REVIEW-JOURNAL
    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 77 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    william horvath wrote on September 02, 2008 07:57 PM: any worker who drinks before work is the same as drinking and GETTING! BEHIND! THE! WHEEL! of a automobile!!!
    I am an electrician


    ..temujin ... khan of the yakka mongols ... wrote on August 10, 2008 09:53 AM: Never mind corporate policy...

    Forget the 110 degree temperatures..

    Pity the poor bar person who stands to lose decent tippers..

    The real tragedy of this story is the adulteration of a fine liquor Jack Daniels with Pepsi....

    ewwwwww.....


    charlie morgan wrote on August 10, 2008 09:41 AM: I believe Arnold M. Knightly is a cake-eater who probably wears saddle shoes.


    Safety Super wrote on August 09, 2008 02:37 PM: First what must be realized is that no one is completely correct or innocent here.
    The paper is looking for a story, it is how they make a living, so they do not get nor tell the whole story.

    Those arguing about drug testing usually are the ones that are guilty, it is not a privacy issue it is those who choose to use. There is a reason we have to go through security at airports now it is because it takes only one to cause an incident that can kill hundreds or more.

    The unions have a brotherhood and we used to take care of each other doing work with pride, our methods were done safely and in a timely maner, we were known as the best. Now we have people who hide others to "protect" them whether they come in drunk, high or are not capable of doing the job at hand. This same group looks for ways to make projects last longer.

    Safety is a culture that must have each individuals buy in, refuse to turn a head to "not see" what someone else is doing. We need to be pro-active at the same time not being overly active. Replace the danger tape that has fallen back to where it belongs, cover the hole so that someone will not trip because of it, remove the damaged extension cord. Deep down we know what safe is, we have just become to lazy as a culture to care about it.

    We would rather blame someone else for all of our short comings, ultimately it is our own unawareness that causes our injuries.

    To have only two recordables in over 35 years to me is only an okay record.

    Watch the responses to this.


    Vic Frankenstein wrote on August 08, 2008 10:51 PM: Binaryplumber (Wha?) has it right when he says the responsibility rests with the tradesman. They drill it into (or rather throw it at) our heads at every safety meeting and orientation we go to - our safety depends primarily on our own actions.

    To blame OSHA for what some moron does onsite is like blaming policemen for the crime in the city.


    UNLVbaby wrote on August 08, 2008 10:20 PM: jed wrote on August 07, 2008 10:22 PM:
    Or are you insinuating that they should found more?




    jed wrote on August 07, 2008 10:21 PM:
    "And it took these reporters 4 separate occasions to find 10 workers?!!"

    What that means is every time they looked, they found 2 or 3.

    No Jed...I don't think they should have found more. The point I was making was to find 2 or 3 out of thousands means that they're pointing their fingers in the wrong direction if you ask me...which no one did. But since my opinion comes freely, you have it. My spouse goes to work sober everyday, monitors his guys for safety issues and corrects them since that is part of his job. These guys look out for each other also. Do you seriously think one would let a friend do something to hurt himself? If you do, I'd hope I'm not your friend OR your enemy.


    spark tramp wrote on August 08, 2008 06:32 PM: It sure is easy for these people that don't work on the City Center project to be judgmental. I haven't smelled alcohol on anybody or seen anybody drunk. We all know that person would be fired on the spot. Thanks to this newspapers witch hunt, the men in the video are out of a job. I've worked with them both, they certainly always had their wits about them. About overtime, the reason I'm working it now is, as with most workers there, work was scarce at home out of state. I worked 3 months last year. Many of us have even lost our homes because of the economy. I'm not greedy, just starving. I personally don't know why their have been so many deaths on this job. I've never seen anything like it, and I've been working construction for 30 years. That part is a tragedy.


    Safety Dude wrote on August 08, 2008 11:26 AM: Control of the work at the site is the real issue. It is easy to blame drinking workers, because that makes a dramatic picture. How about taking some pictures of unsafe acts and conditions on the site. How about reviewing the required Site Specific Safety Plan for the project, and comparing that to what is really happening.

    What controls are in place for safety? Yell at employees that are two slow, but blame them for injuries/ deaths?

    We all have our issues. Should one minor mistake by an employee or another employee be allowed to kill somebody?

    The Las Vegas papers are doing a decent job covering the deaths at the project. I have not seen where beer was a factor in the deaths.

    Is this a way to imply blame for workers in those deaths? If that is the reason for the article, shame on you.


    Super B wrote on August 08, 2008 09:20 AM: Having been a super for PBC for almost 10 years, I have seen both sides of this argument. The bottom line is that random drug and alcohol testing should be required on all construction projects. Unfortunately, we will never know if the workers that were killed on this project had anything at all in their systems. And for those people who say that prescription drugs would alter or skew the results, drug testing can identify those too.

    The unions will never allow it. They view it as an invasion of privacy. Allow contractors to do random testing and you will quickly find out how big of a problem this really is.


    ..temujin ... khan of the yakka mongols ... wrote on August 08, 2008 05:58 AM: The great Khan worked on this project folks....

    The reality is you got 30 minutes for lunch. five minutes to walk to a bar 20 minutes to lunch and have a taste five minutes to return to work.

    This covers 99% of the workforce.. there may be the occasional sweethearts that can hang out longer but if the majority show up five minutes late once too often they get their money and there down the road

    Get real Citizens.. its really a twenty minute lunch..How much of a buzz can you get in a twenty minute lunch...???

    As for the after work crowd it's none of your business...Possibly the Review Journal may be responsible for a wrongful termination lawsuit for those photographs...

    Some of these postings show extreme prejudice and thats a real pity citizens..


    Read All Comments