Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Saturday
Mar 20, 2010
Clear
Clear 58° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


Ban on new charter schools lifted

Some on Board of Education worry funding for staff still will be an issue




Once put on hold, the charter school movement is back in Nevada as the state Board of Education on Saturday lifted a moratorium, approved new regulations and allowed two online charter schools to expand to kindergarten through third grade.

Charter schools are alternative public schools that receive per-pupil funding from the state government, but are not as closely regulated as traditional public schools.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Rare, exotic birds killed in fire
  2. Ex-NFL linebacker Livingston dies
  3. Woman tells how suspect killed husband, shot her
  4. Titus, Berkley say they will vote for House bill; 'public is demanding this,' says Titus
  5. Court: Anna Nicole Smith gets none of oil fortune
  6. Northern Iowa guard's 25-foot 3-pointer KOs Rebels
  7. Northern Iowa guard's 25-foot 3-pointer KOs Rebels
  8. Student arrested for bringing gun to school
  9. Republicans subpoenaed in Ensign probe
  10. Madness trip turns into memorial

  • Ensign targets Titus constituents with health care phone call



  • They are organized by private groups to fill a particular role in education. State Board member John W. Gwaltney of Reno, for instance, said charter schools are better "for students with serious problems" who would otherwise impede education at traditional schools.

    Gwaltney said he looks at charter schools as possible salvation for a "broken public school system" that is too underfunded.

    Funding problems, however, are what led the board to impose a moratorium on applications for new charter schools late last year. Officials with the state Department of Education said they did not have the staffing to process applications.

    The state was inundated after Nevada's two largest school districts, Clark and Washoe, decided they would no longer sponsor charter schools.

    State officials also wanted time to devise more regulations, such as a process for revoking a charter school.

    On Saturday, the Board of Education approved new guidelines for charter schools and decided in a 6-2 vote to lift the moratorium after Keith Rheault, state superintendent of public instruction, said the state's Interim Finance Committee had approved the hire of a new staff person.

    Barbara Myers, a board member from Carson City, said the board was obligated to lift the moratorium because the terms for it had been met.

    The state Department of Education plans to use money from charter school applicant fees to hire additional staff.

    Ideally, state officials would like to have 41/2 employees to monitor and evaluate charter schools. However, state officials admitted they were unsure of how many employees they actually could hire because of uncertainty with the state budget and doubts about how much money could be generated from fees.

    "We got one (employee) out of the 41/2 we'd like," said Vice President Anthony Ruggiero, who joined board member Cindy Reid in voting against lifting the ban on new charter schools.

    Reid also complained that the state board is turning into a "mini-school district" because it has to supervise so many charter schools. It had nine active charter schools last year but more are under review and others might be expanding.

    Reid also criticized charter schools as money-making schemes often run by for-profit, out-of-state companies.

    Craig Butz, principal of Nevada Connections Academy, said for-profit companies are responsible for innovation. Without them, education would be back to the days of "learning from Socrates sitting out in the grass," Butz said.

    In 6-2 votes with Reid and Ruggiero in opposition, the board also allowed Nevada Connections Academy and another online charter school, Nevada Virtual Academy, to expand to early grades of kindergarten through third grade.

    Though there was concern about K-3 students being too young for online education, the state imposed stipulations, such as mandating independent surveys of parental satisfaction and keeping class sizes at 32-1.

    Ruggiero, again, criticized the online schools as too much like home schools, putting too much responsibility on parents for their children's education.

    Contact reporter James Haug at jhaug@reviewjournal.com or 702-799-2922.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    sack wrote on August 12, 2008 08:41 AM: This thread is worthless without photos :)


    Report abuse

    Zero wrote on August 12, 2008 07:15 AM: Adam:

    I don't see where Gman questioned Mr. Nance's intelligence. You say to use some decency? Perhaps use some decency and correct someone... Oh, I don't know... Correctly?


    Report abuse

    Adam wrote on August 11, 2008 10:45 PM: Gman,

    Shouldn't it be at it's worst? If you're going to insult someone's intelligence, have the decency to do it right.


    Report abuse

    J. Sugarmann wrote on August 11, 2008 07:58 PM: The big question is is Ms.Nance hit able?

    Josh


    Report abuse

    TheCheat wrote on August 11, 2008 07:40 PM: Meh!


    Report abuse

    Gman wrote on August 11, 2008 06:18 PM: Greg Nance....in-breeding at its worse.


    Report abuse

    Frank Hush wrote on August 11, 2008 04:47 PM: After reading the side bar I conclude we need a photo of Mrs.Nance.
    Thank You


    Report abuse

    nvnospin wrote on August 11, 2008 03:17 PM: Can we place too much responsibility on the shoulders of the parents? You know... the people who made it their responsibilty when they decided to have children. If you can't handle the responsibilty don't have the kids.


    Report abuse

    Harry wrote on August 10, 2008 10:25 PM: Cindy Reid and Ruggiero are the real clowns of the board. They have never given a believable reason for voting against these schools. They are nothing more than puppets for the union. It is about time parents have a choice to get out of failing public schools. These charter schools are stuck with having to jump through hoops that a regular school doesn't have. Nance is different but really cares about doing the right thing for parents and kids which is more than I can say about Reid and Ruggiero.


    Report abuse

    HELENWEILS wrote on August 10, 2008 12:02 PM: Charter schools are the only hope Nevada has of eliminating some of the damage done by the teacher's union.


    Read All Comments