Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


TAX FOUNDATION NUMBERS: Study: Nevada's tax burden low

Survey shows residents of Silver State have the second lowest local rate next to Alaska

CARSON CITY -- Forget all that talk about taxes in Nevada being higher than the Himalayas.

A new study shows Silver State residents actually have the second lowest state and local tax burden in the nation.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas
  • DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Halverson removed from bench



  • Nevadans paid 6.6 percent of their income in state and local taxes during the fiscal year that ended June 30, according to the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan education association based in Washington, D.C.

    That rate was second lowest to Alaska's 6.4 percent rate. The national average was 9.7 percent.

    Nevada has ranked as the third, second or lowest taxed state in all of its annual surveys for the last 30 years, according to Bill Ahern, a Tax Foundation spokesman.

    "There is no question Nevada is a low taxed state," he said Monday.

    Ahern said that unlike other studies that tend to place Nevada in the middle of states in terms of total taxation, his organization's study credits gaming taxes -- paid mostly by out-of-state residents -- to the states where gamblers actually live before it calculates the percentages.

    About 27.4 percent of Nevada's revenue comes from gaming taxes.

    The Tax Foundation also did not figure in lodging, rental car and sales taxes paid by tourists spending time in Nevada in calculating the tax burden of Nevadans.

    Ahern said these calculations are difficult to make, but they give a truer picture of the tax burden on actual residents in each state.

    The states with the lowest tax burden all are among the nine without a state income tax, or five without sales taxes, he said. Nevada has no state income tax; Alaska has no sales tax.

    The 6.5 percent state sales tax rate in Nevada is slightly above the 6 percent national average, according to the Tax Foundation study.

    But add-ons assessed by local and county governments bring the Nevada sales tax rate to an average of 7.56 percent.

    That overall rate is not out of line with the rest of the nation, Ahern said.

    New York local governments added 4 percentage points to the state's 4 percent sales tax rate. In parts of Massachusetts, the sales tax rate is 9.75 percent. California has a 7.25 percent sales tax rate, but add-ons have brought the tax rate to more than 9 percent in some cities.

    The Tax Foundation bases its results not on total state and local tax collections, but on taxes actually paid by individual taxpayers.

    That means that payroll, unemployment and other taxes paid by Nevada businesses were not counted in determining the rankings. These taxes are not paid by workers, but by the businesses.

    State Sen. Bob Beers, R-Las Vegas, said the most important fact he secured from the study was that Nevada is one of six states which receives a majority of its tax revenue from people visiting the state.

    If you count the taxes paid in the state by nonresidents, Nevada ranks 25th in terms of per capita taxes, he said.

    "We are right in the middle," Beers said. "Government doesn't really care if the taxes come from residents or visitors; a dollar is a dollar," he said.

    Carole Vilardo, president of the Nevada Taxpayers Association, said she won't buy the conclusion that Nevada is the second lowest taxed state until she reviews the study in detail.

    But she did say Nevada is among the lower taxed states and that the Tax Foundation does qualify how it makes its calculations. The Nevada Taxpayers Association represents many different types of Nevada businesses.

    Vilardo said economic development organizations can use the study results to sell the state to potential businesses.

    "This is a tool that can be used to tout Nevada economically," Vilardo said. "It is particularly good for companies that might be looking at Nevada."

    Ben Kieckhefer, a spokesman for Gov. Jim Gibbons, said the study results are positive for Nevada.

    "It is our low tax burden that causes people to create business in this state and businesses to relocate in this state," he said. "It is something to be proud of."

    He said it's important for Nevada to have lower taxes than California since companies there are more likely to relocate to Nevada. Californians face a 10.5 percent state and local tax burden, the sixth highest in the nation.

    Former Assemblywoman Sharron Angle, R-Reno, could not be reached for comment on the study.

    Angle is pushing for voters to adopt a constitutional amendment along the lines of California's Proposition 13 which would limit property tax increases to 2 percent a year.

    According to Vilardo, whose organization opposes Angle's initiative, Nevada ranks 36th among the states in property taxes.

    A state law passed in 2005 limits property tax increases to 3 percent a year for resident-occupied homes, and 8 percent for commercial properties.

    Angle, a state Senate candidate, has argued that legislators could increase property taxes at any time, while if voters approve her initiative, then it could not be changed from 2 percent without a subsequent vote of the people.

    Her proposal, however, faces court challenges before it can win a spot on the November ballot.

    Ahern said property taxes were included in the Tax Foundation calculations.

    While Nevada legislators in 2003 increased taxes by a record $833 million, the Tax Foundation found it made only a slight difference in the percentage of taxes paid by Nevada residents.

    Residents paid 7.2 percent of their income, or $1,625 in state and local taxes, in fiscal year 2003.

    In fiscal year 2004, the period when higher taxes were implemented, they paid $1,860, or $235 more in state in local taxes.

    But income rose dramatically during that period and the total tax burden rose to 7.3 percent.

    The overall tax burden has declined each year in Nevada since 2004. The 6.6 percent current tax burden was tied for the lowest over the past 30 years.

    Contact reporter Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.



    Leave Your Comment 13 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    CAS127 wrote on August 13, 2008 08:13 AM: Eagerly awaiting teacher union's inevitable demand that they are entitled to everyone else's money.


    ths wrote on August 12, 2008 11:36 AM: Share the Burden movement, email me at recallgibbons@yahoo.com.

    We need to step forward and fix the system to make this ok state a great state with still low taxes but can attract more then a casino to the community.

    Everytime a new master plan goes up instead of trying to create a coorporate HUB of activity they say lets build a casino. This will only get this state so far.

    Time to put true leadership in power and time to move past the 'Ignorance of the Masses' to the 'Masses of the Educated'.

    This state is just an example of how the country can go wrong as a whole. We need to turn course and we can do it first in the state level.


    wildbill wrote on August 12, 2008 09:57 AM: I moved her 10 years ago from the armpit of the nation (Joisey) so I could afford a house. I pay less than half now in property taxes than I would have paid 10 years ago in Joisey. My brother pays over $8,000 a year in property taxes on a house about the same size as mine. I have no kids, but am willing to pay a little more for public schools. Businesses need to realize that when they move here, more people use public services. They should pay something to help. The tax structure in this state is too dependant on gaming. Time to share the burden.


    Chris wrote on August 12, 2008 09:28 AM: Dr J - vehicle registration is $33, the rest of the payment is taxes, not registration, based on the original base mrsp of the vehicle. This tax is included in the 6.6%.


    ths wrote on August 12, 2008 09:18 AM: There are two sure things in life, taxes and death. Don't move to Nevada to escape taxes as some want services and are willing to pay for it.

    While you pay 1% property you complain about high registration. You can't have your cake and eat it to.

    IGNORANCE OF THE MASSES reign in this state at the sacrafice of the well being of all.


    HELENWEILS wrote on August 12, 2008 09:05 AM: OUR LICENSE PLATES ARE THE HIGHEST IN THE
    COUNTRY. OUR COPS ARE THE HIGHEST PAID IN THE COUNTRY. OUR FIREMAN ARE THE HIGHEST PAID IN THE COUNTRY. OUR GOVERNMENT WORKERS ARE SOME OF THE HIGHEST PAID IN THE COUNTRY.
    Where does Senator Bob Beers stand on this? He wants to cut the license plate fees in half. Thank you, Bob!
    We moved here to get away from high taxes.
    If the DemoRats get their way they would
    have us be the highest taxed state in the US. We are at a very dangerous crossroads. We have Barbara biach Buckley wanting to lead the way to higher taxes. We have Dina Taxes running for Congress. We are at a tipping point
    this election. If we get one more DemoRat they will be picking your pockets for the special interests government employees unions which they
    are part of!
    Be aware and very scared for the future of Nevada if this happens.


    Dr J wrote on August 12, 2008 08:41 AM: While taxes are low, "fees" and "assessments" are becoming outrageous. Consider the DMV. The costs of registering vehicles is absoluting sickening. Where is Bob Beers on this issue?


    ths wrote on August 12, 2008 07:49 AM: One problem with the concept that businesses will move here because the tax burden is low.

    Education and transportation infrastructure. These are the other two most major concerns for a business with qualifying higher paid positions. They need educated people to fill the positions and they need good transportation to do commerce.

    To give these two infrastructures it only comes from taxes. Also the fact that majority of our tax dollars come from tourism why you think we are in such a big pinch.

    2nd lowest taxes per resident matches our second lowest education system, crowded roads, and lack of services. Perhaps we can diversify our tax basin while still staying low on the charts.

    I am willing to pay more so my future kids can get a good education. About you? We need a real leader that will make the tough decisions, not the popular decisions.

    Recall Gibbons. Email me at recallgibbons@yahoo.com as I am building the list of volunteers to bring a revolution to how Nevada does business. We will prosper through education and well invested money rather then no investment and continue 'Ignorance of the Masses'.


    Jack wrote on August 12, 2008 07:42 AM: I notice whenever there is a headline or byline in the paper, LL responds with some remark about how he hates cops.

    We are wondering LL, why the itense hatred, after all, it isnt the cops fault that he had to take you in for what you did to the neighbors dog...you just got caught now GET OVER IT!


    Jack wrote on August 12, 2008 07:41 AM: I notice whenever there is a headline or byline in the paper, LL responds with some remark about how he hates cops.
    We are wondering LL, why the itense hatred, after all, it isnt the cops fault that he had to take you in for what you did to the neighbors dog...you just got caught now GET OVER IT!


    Read All Comments