Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


Nye County races must be staged again

Call it a do-over, election style.

Come Nov. 4, voters in Nye County will get one more crack at a pair of school board races that looked like they had been decided during Tuesday's primary.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Penthouse wants piece of the Strip
  • RAMPAGE ENDS IN SUICIDE: Man runs amok in Las Vegas
  • ROBBERY-HOMICIDE CASE: Juror sent flirtatious messages
  • Father mourns his daughter
  • NORM: 'Joe the Plumber' too booked for LV
  • Judge asks court to release son arrested after crash that killed girl
  • NORM: Strip club owners, 'Vinny' part ways
  • Anger over cuts reaches fever pitch
  • Working beneath Lake Las Vegas
  • DISCIPLINE COMMISSION: Halverson removed from bench



  • State election officials on Friday ruled that the two contests never should have been placed on the primary ballot in the first place and ordered the races to be repeated during the general election.

    Nye County Clerk Sam Merlino said the mistake was hers, the result of misreading state election law.

    She reported the error to the Nevada secretary of state's office immediately after the Review-Journal brought it to her attention on Thursday.

    "Every election you worry about whether you've done something wrong. All someone has to do is ask the question, and you think, 'Oh no,' " Merlino said.

    One of the races pits incumbent school board member J.E. "Doc" McNeely against Kathleen Bienenstein. The other features incumbent Harold Tokerud and Courtland Ofelt.

    Merlino said she thought state law had been changed recently to require nonpartisan races among two or fewer candidates to be decided during the primary as part of an effort to reduce the length of general election ballots in some counties.

    That's why she placed the two school board contests on Tuesday's ballot, and that's why her office declared McNeely and Tokerud as the outright winners after the votes had been tallied.

    Ofelt was surprised and more than a little upset to open the Review-Journal on Thursday and read that he had lost.

    As far as he was concerned, the campaign hadn't even started yet.

    "I didn't plan to get out there at all before the primary. Why would you? There's just two candidates," he said.

    Merlino said she has lost sleep over the mistake, and she was glad to get an answer from state election officials when she did late Friday afternoon so she wouldn't have to fret about it all weekend.

    What they told her, she said, is that there was "really no harm done." She would be let off on a technicality: While state law requires nonpartisan races between two candidates to be decided during the general election, there is nothing in the statutes that prohibits such races from being placed on the primary ballot first.

    The good news for Bienenstein and Ofelt is that they are still in the hunt, and now they have a clear idea of exactly what they're up against.

    On Tuesday, McNeely took 54 percent of the vote to Bienenstein's 46 percent, while Tokerud captured 67 percent to Ofelt's 33 percent, results that represent little more than an elaborate public opinion poll.

    Frankly, Ofelt thinks he did pretty well for someone who didn't participate in any meet-the-candidates events or put up any campaign signs, which he considers a form of "visual pollution" anyway.

    "I came up with a third of the vote. That's incredible," he said. "I don't have my name out there."

    Starting next month, though, Ofelt aims to change that.

    "I'm going to campaign voraciously," he said. "I'm going to get out there with the facts."

    Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@ reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0350.



    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Dr. Ofelt wrote on August 18, 2008 04:39 PM: Thank you for this "fair and balanced report."

    I left a message on your tele.

    I wish I could produce a cartoon a day for U all....here in A-51.


    Jon H. wrote on August 16, 2008 02:30 PM: Nye County Clerk Sam Merlino said the mistake was hers, the result of misreading state election law.

    This is rich . . .

    In other words, there was not a single other person in Nye County that reviewed and approved her actions?

    Consider that a rhetorical question, with an obvious answer.


    Roger wrote on August 16, 2008 10:24 AM: What? Nye County may be a tad crooked? Noooooooooooo!