Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


DOMESTIC PARTNERS: Panel OKs benefits expansion

Budget cutting makes funding in '09 unlikely

CARSON CITY -- A regulation that makes it state policy to provide health care insurance benefits to domestic partners of state employees -- including those of the same sex -- was adopted Tuesday by a legislative subcommittee on a 3-2 vote.

But Sen. Randolph Townsend, R-Reno, said money still must be found during the legislative session, which starts in February, to expand the health care benefit.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying




  • The amount has been estimated at more than $4 million. In the coming session, Townsend said, the entire Legislature also could debate whether it wants domestic partners to secure the benefit.

    Domestic partners include not only unmarried people of the same sex but of the opposite sex. The state now provides $626 per month per employee in health care benefits.

    "I do think it is the right thing to do," Townsend said during a brief discussion of the rule at a meeting of the Subcommittee on Regulations.

    But chances of the Legislature funding the health care benefits appear slim because Gov. Jim Gibbons has asked state agencies to prepare for cuts of 14 percent for the 2009-11 budget cycle.

    Gibbons has told the Public Employee Benefits Program Board that no increase in state support for the self-funded health insurance program will take place because of declining tax revenue.

    Ben Kieckhefer, the governor's communications director, said Gibbons will not include money for domestic partners in the proposed budget he submits to the Legislature in January.

    "It is not a time we can expand state benefits," Kieckhefer said. "This is $4 million that would have to be taken out of other state programs."

    But he added legislators should have a "policy debate" on whether health care benefits should be given to domestic partners.

    Gary Peck, state director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said his group was pleased by the subcommittee's action.

    "We fully understand that money is an issue, but we hope the governor will reconsider his decision against funding these benefits," he added.

    Officials from the Higher Education System of Nevada have argued that they have been hurt in recruiting efforts because the state does not offer health care benefits to domestic partners.

    The higher education system was the first to approach the Public Employee Benefits Program Board with the request that health care benefits be given to domestic partners.

    The board backed the proposed regulation in June but decided earlier this month to delay requesting money until the economy recovers.

    Sen. Maggie Carlton and Assembly Majority Leader John Oceguera, both D-Las Vegas, joined Townsend in backing the regulation.

    Sen. Warren Hardy, R-Las Vegas, and Assemblyman John Carpenter, R-Elko, voted against the plan.

    Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, did not attend the meeting. She is a delegate at the Democratic National Convention in Denver.

    Hardy said the entire Legislature, not just a six-member committee, should decide whether domestic partners should receive health care benefits.

    "I agree it should be brought before the entire Legislature," Carpenter said.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 8 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    John (Gay...and I pay taxes, too!) wrote on August 29, 2008 12:57 AM: I don't have a "livein", I have a partner of 15 years, and because the state of Nevada doesn't recognize that we are "married" shouldn't mean that we don't have the right to the same insurance benefits that heterosexual couples do. We pay more taxes than heterosexual couples, because we are "forced" to be single by the narrow-minded voter base in this state, so these are our tax dollars, too. If heterosexual state employees are allowed the benefit of insurance coverage for their spouses, I say more power to Senator Townsend, Senator Carlton and Assemblyman Oceguera. When the money is there, the benefit should be put in place!


    Report abuse

    Jay wrote on August 28, 2008 10:32 AM: I thought recruiting was on hold due to state budget cutbacks??

    Why are they even bringing this up?


    Report abuse

    Gay People are Tired of Paying for your Kids' Insurance wrote on August 27, 2008 08:41 PM: Single same-sex loving couples, who have been unable to insure their spouses, are tired of paying to insure the brats of straight people, over half of which eventually get divorced.

    (This message brought to you by a straight person who, like gay people, was born that way).


    Report abuse

    Pay for your own insurance! wrote on August 27, 2008 08:11 PM: I am so confused. There is no money available. Voters have twice voted overwhelmingly against same sex marriage. Now these idiots are saying that "domestic" partners of the same sex and opposite sex can extend benefits to their "livein". So bascially they are saying that every state employee is entitled to medical insurance for life for themself and one other person on the public dime.

    This year the Nevada Supreme court made a self serving vote to complel Metro to pay for medical insurance of retirees on the state plan --- for life. The judges will be reaping the benefit of that decision as well as some of our legislators and those they are beholding to. Metro fought the good fight against this misappropriation of tax dollars.

    P.S. Don't be fooled when you read how teachers and others in the state retirement system are retiring early so they will have medical insurance. The truth is, they are retiring early so they will have the bulk of their insurance premium paid for by us, the tax payers, rather than paying themselves. For the rest of us, who pay our own insurance premiums .. call your legislator and hold their dirty rotten feet to the fire on this farce. Considering the monetary shortfall the state is experiencing, perhaps the whole darn plan will go belly up.

    To Senator Hardy and Assemblyman Carpenter -- thank you for voting your conscience rather than along the PC party lines that further take advantage of the taxpapayers. Hardy is right, make the full legislature vote on this next year. Also, a full disclosure as to whether our Supreme Court and elected officials will be participants in the PEBP plan would be appropriate.


    Report abuse

    sharpton wrote on August 27, 2008 10:08 AM: Come on, bureaucrats! Just say it once and for all. You're nothing but a bunch of communistic fascists intent on regulating every aspect of everything.

    That's the truth but you'll never say it in public for fear of the inevitable revolt. So you'll just sneak this by the average dolt in tiny, incremental steps until there's no free America left for anyone, just a collection of regions with a populace giving according to their abilities and receiving according to their needs. And if we don't like it, we'll get the David Copperfield treatment and disappear.


    Report abuse

    SC wrote on August 27, 2008 08:22 AM: This issue was pushed by a gay HR director that is no longer working in Nevada.


    Report abuse

    br wrote on August 27, 2008 06:47 AM: "Officials from the Higher Education System of Nevada have argued that they have been hurt in recruiting efforts because the state does not offer health care benefits to domestic partners."

    Higher Education System wants us to believe they can only recruit the best people by taking care of their partners. That often means hiring the less qualified "mate" to fill a "created" position. Remember UNLVs Harter and her husband?


    They have been trying to slip this by the public for a long time. Now we have three of a five member panel voting for it. Don't be fooled. Domestic partners is just a cover name for same-sex couples. We voted against official marriage of SSC. Permitting benefits to "domestic partners" by including opposite sex partners is a simple ruse.

    Sen. Maggie Carlton and Assembly Majority Leader John Oceguera, both D-Las Vegas, joined Townsend in backing the regulation.

    I'll remember those names.

    They say it will only cost $4 MILLION. You can bet that's a low ball figure. Public employee benefits are already severely underfunded. Some cities have gone into bankruptcy over PE pay and benefits.

    I don't think this legislative panel should be allowed to impose such REGULATION. Bring this matter before the full legislature. The heat will drive a stake through this same-sex benefits monster.








    Report abuse

    odog wrote on August 27, 2008 05:36 AM: more wasted taxes!