Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


CORRECTION ON 09/04/08 -- An article Saturday on how a January fire at the Monte Carlo was fueled by an improper type of resin applied to decorative features misspelled the name of Clark County Development Services Director Ron Lynn.

Resin fueled blaze at resort

Monte Carlo ordered to examine building




An improper type of resin on two decorative features helped spread flames faster in a fire that caused $100 million in damage and forced 6,000 people to evacuate from the Monte Carlo hotel-casino in January, according to a Clark County report released Friday.

An investigation found that an unauthorized resin on a foam band and on parts of a rooftop wall helped spur the fiery spectacle on the 32-story hotel in which plumes of black smoke spewed across the skyline and sent debris flying.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • U.S. HIGHWAY 95 CRASH: Longtime LV officer mourned
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • NORM: At last, Ripa gets her wedding cake
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • ANOTHER SOMBER DAY: Fourth officer in short span dies
  • Surgeon agrees to plea deal in medical malpractice fraud case




  • The county has ordered MGM Mirage Inc. to hire an engineer to examine the building to see what actions are needed. MGM has 120 days to submit a report to the county.

    "We're going to comply with what they ask us to do," MGM spokesman Gordon Absher said. "We'll do whatever is required to make the building safe."

    That might include fixing construction flaws that the company inherited when it bought the Monte Carlo in 2005, Absher said. Aside from the improper resin, investigators found that the exterior coating was thinner than it should be in certain spots and that it didn't encase some foam decorations. However, they said these defects didn't exacerbate the blaze.

    None of the problems that were uncovered started the Jan. 26 fire, officials say. Workers using a hand-held torch to cut through corrugated steel caused the metal to melt and ignite foam materials, fire officials reported earlier this year.

    Some 120 firefighters fought the blaze, which burned along the roof and spread across the facade of the hotel's upper floors. Water from sprinklers and heavy smoke damaged the rooms.

    The fire closed the more than 3,000-room resort for three weeks, and some rooms were taken out of service for renovations. Seventeen people were treated for smoke inhalation or minor injuries.

    MGM won't be cited or fined for having materials out of compliance, in part because the company has been cooperative, county spokesman Dan Kulin said.

    However, MGM will be asked to reimburse the $18,000 cost of analyzing the materials, said Ron Linn, the county's development services director.

    The county paid the initial tab so MGM wouldn't have a hand in the investigation, thus avoiding the appearance of "the fox guarding the henhouse," Linn said.

    Because the hotel was built in 1992, it is subject to 1991 codes, Linn said.

    A chief concern is the horizontal foam band near the 32nd floor, Linn said, because it contains polyurethane, which spurred the flames.

    Pieces of a screen wall on the roof also contain this chemical and also strengthened the fire, Linn said.

    Samples were taken from other decorative elements, including those that didn't catch fire, he said. One goal of the testing was to research how various elements reacted to the blaze so that safeguards can be improved.

    A foam band on a lower section of the hotel did not burn, Linn said.

    County building codes are updated every three years, Linn said. Like many local governments, the county mainly uses the international building codes as guidelines.

    MGM will have to ensure its materials, including the resin, meet the manufacturers' standards, Linn said. These standards often take the place of codes simply because governments can't keep up with all the new products coming out, he said.

    "There are more things out there than the codes can cover," Linn said.

    Contact reporter Scott Wyland at swyland@reviewjournal.com or 702-455-4519.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Bruce wrote on September 02, 2008 05:57 PM: No, the Monte Carlo was a 50/50 joint venture between Mirage Resorts (before the merger with MGM) and Circus Circus Enterprises. At the time, MGM had a disagreement with Mirage over the previously proposed name for the resort (Grand Victoria), so the name was changed to the Monte Carlo. MGM and Mirage merged about four years later.


    dean wrote on August 30, 2008 08:33 PM: "That might include fixing construction flaws that the company inherited when it bought the Monte Carlo in 2005, Absher said."

    Wasn't the Monte Carlo a 50/50 split between MGM Mirage and Circus Circus?


    Frank wrote on August 30, 2008 02:15 PM: I would like the readers to notice how black the smoke is in the photo of the fire. The smoke from the open pit burning of material at the Nevada Test Site Area 51 was very much like this smoke. Theses plastics and the resin which binds them are extremely toxic and our government burned this type of material in open trenches and this toxic material was shipped across state lines without any type of shipping manifest which is a violation of federal law, and I want the people to know that this action killed or made sick hundreds of workers. In addition, now the government will not accept responsibility for their actions. This smoke will kill you, ask the fire personnel about this type of smoke.


    br wrote on August 30, 2008 08:41 AM: Pay attention Mr Kelly. This article has nothing to do with any politicians.


    edward kelly wrote on August 30, 2008 06:29 AM: The Review Journal endorses Obama
    ...the candidate who reluctantly now
    agrees to some offshore oil drilling.
    He agrees only because he sees the polls. He doesnt really want to drill.
    Las Vegas depends on success with low
    cost fuel for planes and cars.
    Got it?