Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


O.J.'s co-defendant again loses bid to postpone trial

Simpson, Stewart face charges in 2007 memorabilia case




O.J. Simpson's co-defendant lost another bid Thursday to get the Nevada Supreme Court to delay or separate their kidnapping and armed robbery trial, due to begin with jury selection Monday.

"We are not satisfied that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted," Justice James Hardesty said in a two-page order rejecting an emergency motion filed hours earlier by Robert Lucherini, lawyer for Clarence "C.J." Stewart.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty




  • In his plea for the state high court to intervene, Lucherini shed light on a closed-door deposition last week by an FBI audio recording expert and a review of jury questionnaires last week by prosecutors, defense lawyers and Clark County District Court Judge Jackie Glass.

    Lucherini said the court ruling spoke for itself.

    Earlier, he told The Associated Press he wanted the court to stay the trial and sever the defendants based on "prejudicial answers" in the jury questionnaire.

    Simpson's lawyers say they're ready for trial.

    Simpson and Stewart face 12 felony charges including kidnapping, armed robbery and assault with a deadly weapon in the Sept. 13, 2007, confrontation with sports memorabilia dealers at a Las Vegas casino hotel room. Four other men who were with them that night have accepted plea deals and agreed to testify for the prosecution.

    Simpson, 61, a former NFL star, film actor and advertising pitchman, maintains that he was trying to retrieve items that had been stolen from him, that he didn't ask anyone to bring guns and that he didn't know anyone in the room was armed.

    Glass delayed the start of the trial once in April, and reset it for Sept. 8. She has since denied repeated requests by Lucherini to sever or postpone the trial, and a state Supreme Court panel last week upheld those rulings. On Wednesday, Glass issued an order prohibiting the release of the 26-page questionnaires completed by prospective jurors until a jury is seated.

    "Out of the 500 jury questionnaires, 252 potential jurors were excluded," Lucherini said in his Thursday plea to the state high court.

    "A significant number of those jurors excluded were because of their prejudice toward Stewart based upon his relationship with Simpson," he said. "Of the remaining 248 prospective jurors, it is unknown how many have not explicitly expressed their prejudice against Stewart."

    Lucherini argues it will be impossible for Stewart, 54, a Simpson golfing buddy from North Las Vegas, to get a fair trial sitting at the defendant's table with Simpson.

    Stewart's lawyer says he fears jurors will want to "correct a perceived miscarriage of justice" in Simpson's acquittal in the 1994 slaying his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, in Los Angeles. Simpson was later found liable for the deaths in a civil case. He now lives in Miami.

    The stakes are high. A kidnapping conviction carries the possibility of life in prison with the possibility of parole, and a robbery conviction would mean mandatory prison time.

    Lucherini referred to the closed-door deposition by Kenneth Marr, an FBI forensic audio examiner, about the authenticity of recordings alleged to be of Simpson and others talking before confronting the two memorabilia dealers.

    Glass sealed Marr's videotaped deposition until it can be shown to a jury.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    mocksy wrote on September 05, 2008 10:48 AM: Get that idiot..bendoverbristol on the jury...this dumdum will pass hummers to the jury..and YAWN....put em' to sleep...


    tapdancing wrote on September 05, 2008 06:35 AM: The deals already been planned out its just the show for the public now with a trial


    Jack wrote on September 05, 2008 04:12 AM: Lets hope at least that the DA does not make the Chris Darden mistake of trusting a jury of black women to do the right thing.
    What a joke that was! Without exception, the black people I talk to think OJ was framed and that he should be set free. What is interesting is that one does not see this type of burying the head in the sand in the white community or the hispanic or latino commmunities.


    Mauna loa wrote on September 05, 2008 03:51 AM: Like I stated before:covering all bets. It's called Jury nullification. How is the DA going to find four or five African Americans to vote guilty is way above my paygrade. The downtown hotel rooms will receive a bump, and the Juice will walk.