Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News


ROBBERY, KIDNAPPING ALLEGATIONS: Trial of Simpson opens

Jury selection gets under way without past fanfare













The O.J. Simpson circus came to town Monday, but nobody went.

Throngs of media, curiosity seekers and publicity hounds were expected to converge on the Regional Justice Center to take part in Las Vegas' most high-profile criminal trial.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields




  • Yet only a handful of media and even fewer spectators were on hand for the start of trial for the Hall of Fame running back and co-defendant Clarence "C.J." Stewart, who each face armed robbery and kidnapping charges in connection with a sports memorabilia heist at Palace Station.

    As jury selection began inside the courthouse, the circus outside was barely one-ring material.

    It included a woman dressed as Wonder Woman and Joe Pepitone, a holdover from last year's preliminary hearing who showed up wearing only a barrel and carrying a sign blasting his grievances with the judicial system.

    "Power to the people! Power to the people!" he shouted.

    His message was heard by a few bystanders and more than three times as many news media.

    Court officials issued more than 585 media credentials for the Simpson trial, including more than 50 for NBC alone. But only a few dozen reporters, producers and anchors actually attended the trial's opening day, choosing to skip what is generally considered one of the least interesting aspects of a trial -- jury selection.

    The first day of jury selection was an often light-hearted affair in the courtroom of District Judge Jackie Glass, who said she hoped to limit the process to a week.

    "I feel like I'm calling bingo," Glass joked to laughter as she read off the numbers assigned to potential jurors, whose names are being kept secret until the end of trial.

    The jury selection process began more than a month ago when 500 potential jurors completed questionnaires with 116 questions.

    Lawyers reviewed the questionnaires and whittled the pool down to 248.

    Of that group, 86 entered the courtroom Monday morning. Jury selection is taking place in District Judge David Wall's courtroom because he has more room.

    Also Monday, lawyer Don Campbell filed a motion on behalf of the Review-Journal and The Associated Press to make the questionnaires public.

    Glass said she would release the sample questionnaire once a jury is picked, but she denied the request to release completed questionnaires until she researched the issue.

    Glass told lawyers to avoid questioning potential jurors about Simpson's past, including his 1995 acquittal on double-murder charges in Los Angeles County.

    "We are not here to relitigate that case," Glass told the lawyers. "A jury adjudicated that case. I realize a lot of people have really strong feelings about that case, but this case is about what happened in Las Vegas."

    Glass also emphatically rejected another motion by Stewart's lawyers to separate his trial from Simpson's trial. She ordered them not to ask for a severance again.

    Glass spent most of the day questioning the jury pool about personal conflicts and their ability to remain fair and impartial. Her questions included whether potential jurors watched the 1995 trial or had ever been victims of crime.

    She also tried to ferret out what she called "stealth jurors" who might be lurking in the jury pool.

    "If you're here looking to become famous for your participation in this case and write a book and be on TV, quite honestly folks, this is not the case for you," she said.

    By the end of the day, Glass excused 17 potential jurors for various medical, personal and other reasons. They included a neurologist with upcoming surgeries, a University of Nevada, Las Vegas student, and a man who admitted he couldn't be impartial because of Simpson's past.

    Between excusals and a mid-morning reduction of the group to 50 potential jurors, 46 were left when Monday's session came to a close. When they return to court this morning, prosecutors and defense lawyers will continue questioning each juror one at a time.

    Opening statements will begin once a panel of 12 jurors and six alternates is picked.

    Bill "Moondog" Wantland, a 54-year-old who came to the courthouse Monday wearing a bright red sequined suit, oversized U.S.-flag top hat and star-framed sunglasses, predicted the crowds outside the courthouse will pick up once opening statements start.

    We might see a three-ring circus just yet.

    Contact reporter Brian Haynes at bhaynes@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0281.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 10 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    MGH wrote on September 11, 2008 09:24 AM: 1. opening statements....imposible to get a fair trial in Las Vegas. This goes for the people of the State of Nevada, and O.J.

    2. This trial is a vindictive move on behalf of the people of the State of Nevada, and the Honorable Jackie Glass should surely see this and dismiss this case, if she still applies her pricipals as she did as a Lawyer with her opened eye husband Mr. Steve Wolfson.


    Report abuse

    M wrote on September 09, 2008 09:27 AM: Can you PLEASE stop reporting him? I don't care and I'm sick of hearing about him. This makes me not want to read or watch the news anymore.


    Report abuse

    tmosley wrote on September 09, 2008 08:11 AM: The AP Story Reads, "Judge limits Simpson jury questioning". Then that story is removed with the RJ Story today which offers this;

    Judge limits Simpson jury questioning Also Monday, lawyer Don Campbell filed a motion on behalf of the Review-Journal and The Associated Press to make the questionnaires public.

    Can anyone see an appeal brewing? Let's hope the Nevada Judiciary follows the rules this time, as everyone is watching. If I were one of his defense attorneys I'd sit back and let the Nevada Judicial System handle it. It fact it appears that is exactly what they are doing.





    Report abuse

    what? wrote on September 09, 2008 07:58 AM: What would happen if I got a gun to go retreive "my stuff?" I would be arrested and jailed, just like O.J. However, if I killed two people, I'd be on death row, like O.J. should be.


    Report abuse

    Dave B wrote on September 09, 2008 07:58 AM: It wasn't OJ's stuff. He was hired by a local boxer who was ripped off to get it back for him. Don't you know anything? Geesh.


    Report abuse

    Reality Check wrote on September 09, 2008 05:28 AM: As one respondant commented "He only took his stuff", I can only say then why did he have to break in to take it?
    It was not his "stuff". When you make ignorant statements like that, it only reveals your comments are based upon emotion, rather than facts. The jury will decide his fate after they review the "facts". Given OJ's history, it is not hard to believe he took something not belonging to him.


    Report abuse

    Fred G wrote on September 09, 2008 03:51 AM: Answer = SHINE


    Report abuse

    David wrote on September 09, 2008 03:40 AM: OJ Guilty Again!But on the serious side, why would he with all he had going for him, get himself involved in something like this?


    Report abuse

    mauna loa wrote on September 09, 2008 03:29 AM: A. Main issue to the jurors, what did OJ take, what did he steal. Did he only steal his "stuff", or did he take their watches,rings,wallets, ect. He only took his "stuff". HELLO. B. I would also bring up the fact, of how many robberty detectives were assigned to this case compare to a AVG joe robbery last night off of D street. HELLO. I'm not trying to condone the incident;however, I don't want this case to be stacked against OJ, trying to make up for the past.
    It doesn't look good for the public image. Like I stated before, when the next "JOE Citz" gets robbed, please write to the sheriff, and ask him why didn't you get a least 10 or more detectives assinged to your case. They (the GOVT) try to tell the people that justice is blind, but we know different. All I'm saying is, it's not right!


    Report abuse

    Russ from N.J. wrote on September 09, 2008 03:19 AM: Judge Jackie Glass-Please kept a tight rein on the lawyers so O J gets a fair trial and them we can hang him. He beat the system once. Let's make sure he doesn't do it again.