Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


WASTE DISPOSAL PLAN: NRC takes on Yucca application

Action begins process for studies, hearings on dump







WASHINGTON -- The once-stumbling Department of Energy reached another milestone Monday when the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced it will conduct in-depth studies and have safety hearings on plans to build a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

The nuclear safety agency's decision to accept a Yucca Mountain application onto its licensing docket represents the latest step forward for the project over the objections of Nevada's elected leaders.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say




  • An 8,600-page license application DOE filed on June 3 "contains sufficient information" for the agency to move ahead to the next stage of formal review, according to Michael Weber, director of the NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

    The move opens the way for detailed safety studies that will be performed by NRC technical staff over the next year and for legal hearings starting next spring before panels of administrative judges where lawyers for Nevada and other parties will be able to raise challenges to the application.

    The entire licensing process is envisioned by law to take three to four years. Many believe it could take years longer for the NRC to sort through a complex, first-of-its-kind project with weighty health and safety implications.

    Weber said budget shortfalls also could cause delays in the agency's work. The agency's budget for Yucca work this year was cut by $8 million, while Weber said a proposed budget for next year also is about $30 million less than what would be needed.

    The fate of the Yucca project also could hinge on the presidential election in November. Democrat Barack Obama has said he will halt the project if he is elected.

    "The Bush administration is continuing to pursue the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump, despite the mounting scientific evidence that it is not safe for the people of Nevada," Kirsten Searer, Nevada communications director for the Obama campaign in Nevada, said Monday.

    Republican John McCain has voted for the repository in the past. Campaign spokesman Rick Gorka said Monday that McCain "is supportive of Yucca as long as it meets environmental and safety concerns." NRC docketing "is one step in the process."

    The NRC's docketing decision came at the end of a 90-day screening period. Roughly 40 NRC staffers and consultants reviewed the DOE's license application, said Lawrence Kokajko, director of the division of high-level waste repository safety.

    Weber stressed the license application was not reviewed for merit, but to ensure it was complete enough to proceed.

    The docketing decision was announced after the NRC notified members of Congress.

    Those from Nevada were not happy although they were not altogether surprised. The NRC last month rejected a call by Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto for the DOE license application to be set aside immediately as flawed and incomplete.

    "The latest development was a formality we expected," said Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev.

    Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., said safety reviews are sure to turn up red flags "and will result in NRC's rejection of the DOE proposal."

    Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., indicated that the battle against the repository is not over.

    "The NRC's decision puts nuclear politics over the health and safety of Nevada families and you can bet that we will continue fighting the Bush-McCain Yucca Mountain plan," she said.

    But Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said he was confident the NRC's "rigorous review process will validate that the Yucca Mountain repository will safely store this waste in a manner that is most protective of human health and the environment."

    The agency's docketing decision "is a significant step forward in solving the nation's problem of disposing of spent nuclear fuel and high-level nuclear waste," Bodman said.

    Besides docketing the license application, the NRC also accepted DOE environmental impact studies for the repository, with one exception. It called for DOE to bolster analyses of how the repository operations would affect groundwater.

    "There appeared to be a gap in some of their analyses," Weber said. "It is not an extensive gap but will require at least several months of effort and analysis to close."

    The Energy Department proposes to build a warren of tunnels beneath Yucca Mountain, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas, where 77,000 tons of used nuclear fuel and highly radioactive material from U.S. weapons manufacturing would be stored and eventually sealed within the mountain.

    An above-ground waste handling complex also would be constructed where canisters of waste would arrive, mostly by rail, from sites in 39 states.

    The department had missed a series of deadlines and was buffeted by budget cuts and bad headlines until new managers in recent years appeared to get the program on track.

    But even as the project makes headway at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a number of other barricades lie ahead.

    DOE needs Congress to pass special legislation to clear away regulatory obstacles and to make larger sums of money available for construction, and lawmakers have shown little interest to date.

    Reid, the Senate majority leader, has said pro-Yucca bills will never pass during his tenure. The repository plan is opposed by a majority of Nevadans. State leaders have committed millions of dollars to fight at the NRC and in courts.

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@ stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 8 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Glaiza Librado wrote on August 13, 2009 12:04 PM: Good thing, there are waste disposal company where they offer trash removal service and provide waste containers such as Trash-a-Haulics wherein they are the number one Trash Company in Augusta GA.


    Report abuse

    ObamaNation wrote on September 09, 2008 02:25 PM: "The Bush administration is continuing to pursue the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump, despite the mounting scientific evidence that it is not safe for the people of Nevada," Kirsten Searer, Nevada communications director for the Obama campaign in Nevada, said Monday.


    Amazing how Obama parrots dingy Harry's safety comments about Yucca even before the scientists and engineers at the NRC begin to weigh in. (Never knew that Obama was an engineering major with a background in nuclear science. Did he read that 8,000 page license yet?)

    If he did, maybe he is more than the incompetent empty suit that most people think he is!


    Report abuse

    Retire Harry wrote on September 09, 2008 01:33 PM: I see that Harry Reid made a promise not to pass pro-Yucca bills during his tenure.

    Will the current NWPA law is all that need for Yucca. nothing new.

    So Harry what can we do to help ypu retire?


    Report abuse

    Bill Clinton Supported YMP wrote on September 09, 2008 07:29 AM: Don't forget the leadership that Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson provided to get the project to this point. They dug the tunnel in Yucca Mountain in 1997.

    The point was made in the R-J on 1-17-2008, that Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson held 21 formal draft EIS hearings (9 in Nevada) in 1999 and 2000, to establish that danger from transportation of nuclear waste is less then such hazardous materials as chorine and propane. This has been a long closed issue, but still raised by Nevada even though they will not do anything about chlorine tankers running by the Vegas Strip.

    Did anyone read the recent article about the Southwest Desert Oasis High School located by the railroad track with daily passings of chlorine and propane tankers? What protection are they provided?

    If Nevada representatives would demand similar protection for Chlorine tankers as will be in place for SNF such as dedicate trains, exclusion zones, evacuation plans, GPS locators, armed guards (to protect from terrorist with TOW missiles), track and signal inspects, alerts to local officials of the location of hazardous materials, trained emergency responders then we could be less concerned about the potential Bhopal like deaths from a toxic laden tankers of 90,000 people.

    Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson had engaged in preparing a positive the Site Recommendation right before they left office.


    Report abuse

    Harry Reid Supports YMP Review wrote on September 09, 2008 07:28 AM: Even Harry Reid has finally admitted that the process has to go on as dictated by the NWPA.

    As noted by the LV Sun, Harry Reid,correctly pointed out in a statement, Nevada now has an estimated four years to persuade the NRC commission to reject the Energy Department request for a license to build the dump.


    Report abuse

    Bill Clinton Supported YMP wrote on September 09, 2008 07:26 AM: Don't forget the leadership that Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson provided to get the project to this point. They dug the tunnel in Yucca Mountain in 1997.

    The point was made in the R-J on 1-17-2008, that Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson held 21 formal draft EIS hearings (9 in Nevada) in 1999 and 2000, to establish that danger from transportation of nuclear waste is less then such hazardous materials as chorine and propane. This has been a long closed issue, but still raised by Nevada even though they will not do anything about chlorine tankers running by the Vegas Strip.

    Did anyone read the recent article about the Southwest Desert Oasis High School located by the railroad track with daily passings of chlorine and propane tankers? What protection are they provided?

    If Nevada representatives would demand similar protection for Chlorine tankers as will be in place for SNF such as dedicate trains, exclusion zones, evacuation plans, GPS locators, armed guards (to protect from terrorist with TOW missiles), track and signal inspects, alerts to local officials of the location of hazardous materials, trained emergency responders then we could be less concerned about the potential Bhopal like deaths from a toxic laden tankers of 90,000 people.

    Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson had engaged in preparing a positive the Site Recommendation right before they left office.


    Report abuse

    Yucca wrote on September 09, 2008 07:24 AM: Fortunately there are bipartisan Nevadans out there that are willing to allow the science to determine the outcome. Even Obama has stopped running those fear mongering ads.

    With the LA docketed for review, Opponents, if they permit an adjudication their positions on technical facts of the program, have should have nothing to fear from a quality review process.

    The LA process continues to establish the suitability of the Yucca Mountain site, and is based on the science of the five supporting national labs and the USGS.

    Obama' idea to withdraw the application is a false promise.

    Is Obama really smarter than the five national labs, the USGS, and the NRC to make a decision to stop the project?

    Stopping Yucca is not a political decision but a legal and technical decision as played out by interveners, the NRC, the five supporting national labs, and the USGS.

    Obama has a dilemma with the false promise he is making to Nevada and Senator Reid with regards to Yucca (to garner five electoral votes. NV Rep. Shelly Berkley let the cat out of the bag when she in a seven minute "assurance" phone call was pleased to note that Obama in Berkley's words (LV R-J 6-21-2008) said "He didn't know how he would stop it."


    Report abuse

    elroy wrote on September 09, 2008 07:08 AM: The Nevada delegation is an embarrassment. The application has yet to be reviewed and Berkley states "The NRC's decision puts nuclear politics over the health and safety of Nevada families and you can bet that we will continue fighting the Bush-McCain Yucca Mountain plan,". Sounds like politics over science. Shelley and the rest of them are nothing but foolish asses. Does the country realy believe that these asses know more about science and engineering than the NRC techical staff? Vote these bozoos out of office