Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


Judge keeps questionnaires secret

District Judge Jackie Glass refused Thursday to release copies of completed juror questionnaires in O.J. Simpson's armed robbery and kidnapping case.

Glass also wouldn't release a blank copy of the jury questionnaire until 12 jurors and six alternates are seated.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • In her order, Glass said she wouldn't release the filled out questionnaires because she didn't want to break a promise she made to potential jurors that their answers would be "kept in confidence, under seal."

    "The Court refuses to betray the trust of those individuals who relied on the representations of the Court in this case," the order states.

    Glass' order was in response to a motion filed by Stephens Media, LLC, the owners of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, and The Associated Press. The news organizations filed the motion to get copies of the blank and filled juror questionnaires on Monday, the day Simpson's trial began. Glass denied the motion orally on Monday.

    About 500 prospective jurors filled out questionnaires for the trial. The court included a letter with the questionnaires stating that potential jurors' answers will be part of the permanent record and therefore will become public documents. But the letter went on to say that after the jury is selected, answers on the questionnaires "will be returned to the Clerk of the Court and kept in confidence, under seal."

    During jury selection this week, attorneys cited some of the questions on the questionnaire when interviewing potential jurors. The jury was asked what they thought of Simpson and his 1995 murder trial, in which he was acquitted of killing his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.

    Glass also said in Thursday's order that she wouldn't release a blank jury questionnaire until the jury is picked, because she doesn't want potential jurors to look at the questionnaire and "tailor their responses to maneuver themselves onto the jury."

    Attorney Don Campbell, who is representing the Review-Journal and The Associated Press, said an appeal was filed with the Nevada Supreme Court seeking to compel Glass to turn over the questionnaires.

    Campbell said there is abundant case law showing that journalists have the right to jury questionnaires in cases.

    In his appeal, Campbell argued that the U.S. Supreme Court "has expressly held that the public and press have a qualified First Amendment right of access" to jury selection proceedings.

    Thomas Mitchell, editor of the Review-Journal, said Glass' promise to the jurors not to release a public document doesn't trump the law.

    "Just because she misspoke to the jurors doesn't give it legal authority," Mitchell said.

    NAKED BOY CONFESSES

    Naked boy is coming clean.

    Jason Dinant, 27, made the news in Simpson's trial when he approached two potential jurors Tuesday night in front of the courthouse. At the time, no one knew who Dinant was or why he approached two potential jurors in violation of Glass' court order.

    Glass, informed by the jurors of the encounter, asked on Wednesday that an investigation be started.

    Dinant learned Wednesday morning that he caused an issue in the Simpson trial and wanted to explain himself.

    "There was no ill intent," he said Thursday.

    Dinant said he approached the potential jurors because he wanted to do man-on-the-street interviews about the trial for his Web site, www.nakedboynews.com.

    On his site, Dinant discusses current events in front of a camera while naked or nearly naked.

    Dinant said he didn't know the two women were potential jurors when he approached them.

    Originally from New York, Dinant lives in Las Vegas and has always been interested in politics and the entertainment industry. He started his site in May so he could "tell the naked truth about how he sees the news."

    "Oftentimes, the major media is afraid to say what they really want to say," he said.

    Contact reporter David Kihara at dkihara@reviewjournal.com or 702 380-1039.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    nearby wrote on September 14, 2008 10:00 PM: She's a whiny, spoiled, self-absorbed brat, who has inherited the "God Complex", so typical of new judges.

    Someone needs to knock her off that pedestal.


    spartacusproject wrote on September 13, 2008 05:06 PM: Jackie Glass meets my definition of an egotistical, hypocritical two faced mirror.

    Makes court decisions and/or rulings without regard of her being overturned by a higher court.

    I am no fan of O.J. Simpson, but to allow a man to stay in the jury pool after stating he is of the mind that Simpson is a murderer--is sucking up to the prosecutor to make any conviction a guilty verdict that she can contribute, and for certain, get a donation to her next campaign.

    Couple this to her mental health courtroom denials to defendant attorneys for mental evaluation reports, says to me, she needs to be replaced. Don't wait Mr. & Mrs. Citizen--she may be your critical overseer someday.

    Even worse, maybe some member of your family will stand before her and get little or no consideration--sooner than you believe. You will think next time you go into a voter's booth, but it may be too late. Rid Nevada of the scum now presiding in Nevada's district courtrooms.

    Get rid of Jackie Glass, you might get rid of her AK-47 gun toting thug-punk bailiffs. Can you imagine the need for that type gun in America's courtrooms?

    Why is there a need for heavy rifles in a courtroom to begin with? Maybe it has to do for the disrespect Nevada's district courts show towards the general public? Just a thought and opinion.


    De wrote on September 12, 2008 04:58 PM: Who completed this so called investigation? Was it court house security, Roger's boy wonders, or the real Police?

    Or was it your office, Judge?

    CONFLICT!


    me wrote on September 12, 2008 03:10 PM: Judge Glass and her Councilman husband, steve wolfson have no respect for the law or legal precedent. They care what is best for themselves and their personal friends. Both need to be replaced come election time. Wolfson peddles his influence like an Olympic cyclist. It's about time someone knocked him off his bike.