Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


JOHN L. SMITH: Sometimes little people come out on top against arrogant big shots

Gerald and Katrina Thitchener lost nearly all their material possessions thanks to an arrogant error by Countrywide Home Loans officials.

They weren't just stripped of their furniture and clothing when a mistake by Countrywide in 2002 set in motion a foreclosure procedure that resulted in their condominium being "trashed out." Couches and coats can be replaced.


Most Popular Stories
  • Planet Hollywood fined for Prive nightclub's actions
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • SENATOR'S AFFAIR: Hamptons given $96,000 in gifts
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back




  • These little people with little money and no political clout also lost precious and irreplaceable things. There were Gerald's service medals from the Persian Gulf War and the picture he cherished of his Air Force unit's meeting with President George H.W. Bush. There was Katrina's wedding band and dress, and the video taken the day they were married.

    Then there were the lost pictures, photos of departed family members, of high school days, of their children.

    The Thitcheners lost a lot back in 2002, including some of their faith in the system; but on Thursday the Nevada Supreme Court determined that their losses, and the actions of the mortgage giant, deserved compensation in the approximate amount of $2 million.

    It took a six-year fight, but Thitchener is no stranger to battle.

    A Gulf War veteran, he served 15 years in the Air Force as an F-16 mechanic before being honorably discharged in April 2001. On the same week he left active duty, he signed on with Nevada's Air National Guard.

    There was little time to rest.

    Thitchener quickly returned to active duty following the events of Sept. 11, 2001. He was transferred from Las Vegas to Tucson, Ariz.

    Katrina, pregnant at the time, remained in the family's condominium with the couple's children, Kaitlyn and Steven. When it became apparent Gerald wouldn't be returning to Las Vegas soon, Katrina made occasional commutes to Tucson and eventually took an apartment there.

    Although they had missed some payments on the condo to Countrywide in early 2002, their mortgage was current in June of that year, and the family's monthly bills were forwarded to their Tucson address.

    They left their power on in Las Vegas and paid their property taxes and homeowner association's dues. In addition to all the personal items, food was left in the cupboards and refrigerator.

    But when Countrywide moved to foreclose on another condo in the Thitchener's complex, a mistake was made that resulted in the Air Force man and his family losing almost everything. The Thitcheners lived in unit 118. Unit 10 was in foreclosure.

    When the time came to "trash out" the foreclosed-upon condo, unit 118 was selected despite all the warning signs of occupancy. The result was devastating.

    Not that Countrywide admitted the gravity of its mistake. The Thitcheners through their lawyers, Terry Coffing and Terry Moore, fought for more than two years before winning a $3.4 million judgment in District Court. Before trial, they had sought to settle the case for $400,000.

    During trial, Thitchener wore his Air Force uniform to court. While some might have groused that he was playing up his military status during a time of heightened patriotism, it was also true that his only suit was thrown away during the assault on his condominium.

    Countrywide lost, but wasn't chastened. It appealed to the state Supreme Court.

    The state Supreme Court on Thursday not only agreed with the Thitcheners that the punitive damage award in the case "was supported by substantial evidence," but it used the case as a vehicle to "clarify" the state's case law on the subject. In doing so, it overruled two previous decisions and refined its own legal language regarding punitive damages.

    That amounts to a substantial amount of fine-tuning in this area of Nevada law. It also should mean that the Thitcheners will be compensated for their losses.

    "Despite the fact Countrywide knew where the Thitcheners were, the foreclosure went forward," Coffing says. "Despite all the red flags going up that said, 'This is wrong,' they went ahead and did it anyway.

    "Here's a guy, a salt-of-the-Earth, good-hearted guy who never harmed a fly, slugging it out for our country and enduring incredible hardship. And then this happens to him. It's very fulfilling to help those kinds of people."

    It is, in fact, enough to restore your faith in a legal system known all too often for comforting the comfortable and trashing the little people.

    John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0295.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Deberah Roberts wrote on September 15, 2008 01:24 PM: I am currently going through some very similar trouble with Countrywide. I started the process of a Loan Modification with Countrywide last October. It was completed and papers signed and submitted in January, 2008. Please note that I have NEVER been late nor have I missed a payment. The modification was to change the adjustment date of my loan out 5 years to avoid such a problem. Since that time, every payment I have made has been misapplied to my mortgage. Countrywide admittedly did not take the appropriate action in completing the modification and their computer continuously reports me as having not made my payments on time. This, in return, causes their computer to report to the credit bureau as being 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, 120 days, and now 150 days late. Countrywide tells me that they have backed out all of my payments since January into another account until such time that they are able to correct the problem. My credit is ruined. The continually tell me they are working on it and that they will provide a letter to the bureaus when it has been corrected. What am I to do in the mean time? I have been denied credit on three seperate occasions (after receiving letters from Countrywide that the problem was fixed). This has gone on for 10 months now, and they have ruined me. It would be nice to find an attorney that would be willing to go after their jugglar on this one! It was bad enough when the credit bureaus ran your life, now apparently Countrywide does too! Anyone with any advice, please let me know at djguess1@yahoo.com


    Robin wrote on September 14, 2008 02:52 PM: Support the Nevada New Home Lemon Law.
    http://lasvegaslemonade.org


    zebra123 wrote on September 14, 2008 12:14 PM: In addition, last week Countrywide announced that 2 million clients had their personal information sold, including SS numbers (don't know who has that info), by an employee. They are offering free credit security measures.

    I don't know, sounds like it's another of their illegal business strategies.


    art wrote on September 14, 2008 07:32 AM: Great! The little guy finally gets justice! Countrywide has the one of the worse reputations of any mortgage lender in the county, and was publically exposed years ago for ot's often illegal practises. If I were on the jury they would have gotten punative damages of $10 million!


    lughead wrote on September 14, 2008 07:18 AM: Sometimes little people come out on top against arrogant big shots-NO MOST ALL TIMES THey DON'T-the reason they won is because country wide foreclosed on the wrong house that was a blantant mistake on their part and they took away irreplaceable items which led to the big win. I'm glad they came out ahead after all country wide put them thru-The Thitcheners lived in unit 118. Unit 10 was in foreclosure. Your title is misleading-little guy wins- anyone that wouldn't have awarded this couple would have been insane


    Andy wrote on September 14, 2008 06:10 AM: Countrywide is evil. They deserve to be put out of business.