Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Saturday
Jul 31, 2010
Mostly Cloudy
Mostly Cloudy 101° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


Outside groups join Porter-Titus ad blitz

Candidates also attacking each other in commercials







A new television ad attacking Dina Titus features banjo music, a high-lonesome whistle and the outline of the Lone Star State. A commercial attacking Jon Porter has thumping disco music and Porter's head on an awkwardly dancing body.

The campaign ads, both of which began airing this week, aren't coming from the candidates, but from external groups with a stake in their campaigns for Congress.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Poll: Reid, Angle neck and neck
  2. Attorney, arrested while jogging, has lawsuit pending against police
  3. Warrant seeks unlicensed process server
  4. Poll: Nevadans angry, pessimistic
  5. 'King James' feels heat of spotlight
  6. High court suspends Las Vegas lawyer
  7. Power lines endangered
  8. Pacquiao-Margarito fight will happen outside of Nevada
  9. Immigration raid's timing 'bizarre,' Las Vegas activist says
  10. Poll: Voters support higher taxes on gambling, mining industries




Titus, a state senator, is the Democratic candidate for the 3rd Congressional District, looking to unseat incumbent Republican Porter as he seeks a fourth term.

Porter has one of the toughest fights in the nation on his hands, so it's no surprise that the candidates are getting help from national groups. The anti-Titus ad, which began airing Wednesday, is sponsored by Freedom's Watch, a Washington-based conservative advocacy group whose major backer is Las Vegas casino magnate Sheldon Adelson.

The anti-Porter ad, which went on the air Tuesday, comes from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democrats' campaign arm for House races.

"For the special interests in D.C., it's one big party, and Congressman Jon Porter is all in," the ad says, as images of boogie-ing clubgoers beneath a disco ball flash alongside the Capitol dome. "Porter took over $400,000 from insurance and drug interests, $233,000 from oil and gas interests, and voted them billions in tax breaks. Porter receives taxpayer funded health care, yet voted to cut billions from veterans' benefits. This year, the party's over."

A spokesman for Porter said the contributions cited in the ad go back to 1989 and noted that Titus has taken money from those industries, too.

"The ad omits contributions Senator Titus has received from the same industries, including $15,000 from the oil and gas industry, $10,615 from the pharmaceutical industry and $24,500 from the insurance industry," Matt Leffingwell said. "The best moves in the ad are the DCCC dancing around Dina's past."

The Freedom's Watch ad attacking Titus employs a narrator with a broad twang to make the words "tax us" and "Texas" sound alike.

"Dina Titus -- she must be from Taxes!" the narrator says as a silhouette of Texas appears onscreen. "Dina voted for the biggest tax increase in Nevada's history." The ad pronounces the name of the state in a manner that most Nevadans consider incorrect, rhyming the middle syllable with "law" rather than "bad."

"She voted to 'taxus' by raising taxes on small businesses, and to 'taxus' when we buy a house," it continues. "Titus never had enough tax money to spend. So why 'taxus'? Titus wants to give scholarships to illegal immigrants and to quadruple her state pension."

The tax-hike criticism stems from the 2003 tax battle in the Legislature, which was supported by Democrats and Republicans and signed by a Republican governor. The pension claim, also raised in a Porter ad, refers to a 1989 move to increase lawmakers' pensions that was later repealed.

A spokesman for Titus said the ad was "to be expected from a group with ties to Karl Rove," the Bush campaign architect who reportedly serves as a Freedom's Watch consultant.

"It's no surprise that Jon Porter and his friends at Freedom's Watch continue their negative attacks instead of focusing on real solutions or his record," Andrew Stoddard added. "While Jon Porter has taken $1.6 million from the finance, insurance, and real estate sector, Nevadans have seen the worst financial crisis, record gas prices, record foreclosures and record job losses on his watch."

Freedom's Watch is a technically nonpartisan organization that has been active in multiple congressional races over the past year. Democrats charge that the group is filling the void left by the cash-scrapped Republican campaign arm, the National Republican Congressional Committee, which has had fundraising trouble and an embezzlement scandal to boot.

According to documents on file with local television stations, the NRCC had reserved ad time starting Sept. 30 but recently canceled the first two weeks' reservations. An NRCC spokesman would not comment on campaign strategy but said any changes didn't reflect a lack of confidence in Porter's ability to win.

"Jon Porter is in good shape for re-election," Ken Spain said.

Porter and Titus also have been airing their own ads, some of them attacking one another. But outside groups generally can be more brutal in their attacks because the candidates don't have to answer for what they say.

Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball @reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (8)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

Alan wrote on September 25, 2008 07:11 PM: Close all Casino's, freak em, they don't pay taxes, supply jobs, bring in tourist hell with them. Democrats do not or can not understand that the President does not pass bills, laws, he Either signs them into law or vetos them. Look at all the bills that the President signed into law and you will find many demoncrats name on them. That is a vote with the President. Many nevadans need too stop listening to the TV and go get a history lesson on the United States government and how it suppose too work. Revolution is what we need and greed must be burned down and out. Greeds profits and personal property needs to be returned to the Citizens Of USA.


Report abuse

Revolution Calling wrote on September 25, 2008 12:56 PM: Well for the squeamish that would rather revolt by proxy, might I suggest you use the politicians' system against them and vote 3rd party. If you can't stomach pummelling one for real, do it at the ballot box. BUT DON'T JUST VOTE FOR THE "OTHER PARTY!!!" They are one in the same.

POLITICIAN was not a choice to consider on career day back in grade school. Stop making it a choice for society's LEECHES!


Report abuse

LittleBird wrote on September 25, 2008 11:27 AM: Glad to know just how close Porter is to the gaming influence,being the gaming runs the corrupt State of Nevada.Four terms is long enough,and Porter thinks he's entrenched by his cronies.Vote out all incumbents.Titus is scary,too.What wounderful choices we have.LOL


Report abuse

Steve.Bozell wrote on September 25, 2008 08:44 AM: One more time, for everyone who swallows what Titus says without stopping to think for even a second:

Porter doesn't vote "with Bush" 90% of the time, 95% of the time, or 99.9% of the time.

Bush is an executive, not a legislator. He doesn't "vote" on anything. He simply signs bills into law, or vetoes them.

Of course, if a bill crosses his desk, that means most congressmen voted for it - which presumably would include Porter most of the time. So if anything, Bush "votes" with Porter (and hundreds of other congressmen), not the other way around, if that's how you want to come up with that 90+% figure.

Besides, the overwhelming majority of bills that go through Congress include stuff like "a bill proclaiming August National Herpes Awareness Month" and "a resolution to honor the memory of Bob Hope". In other words, whichever congressman disagrees with Bush the most still probably votes "with" him 75% of the time or so.


Report abuse

Arvid Harbinger wrote on September 25, 2008 07:39 AM: I am voting for Jon Porter. Dina Titus will simply raise taxes, then spend the money on huge government programs that accomplish nothing.


Report abuse

Jamie wrote on September 25, 2008 07:34 AM: Jon Porter voted with Bush 99.9% of the time, and that should be the end of the story. Our wrecked economy, our ruined stature in the world, our devastated constitution...Porter supports all of it. I hope Nevada voters in that district are smart enough to reject his smear campaign and help get our country back on the right track...but I wonder.


Report abuse

Jeroethel wrote on September 25, 2008 06:39 AM: Bottom line is that both ads are true. Neither candidate offers much of a choice for a voter who wants smaller government.


Report abuse

Miles Monroe wrote on September 25, 2008 06:35 AM: I like Dina Titus. She's been my state senator for years. But she lost my vote when she voted for that last big tax increase. I haven't voted for her since.