Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


OLDER DRIVER DILEMMA

Cases involving seniors in traffic accidents lead to different outcomes

CARSON CITY -- Lifelong motorcycle enthusiast Stephen Emens was driving his Harley-Davidson on Rainbow Boulevard the morning of April 27, 2006, when he suddenly was struck by a Buick pulling into traffic out of a driveway.

The collision killed Emens.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying




  • Lois Ostraat, the driver of the Buick, was found guilty of a left turn violation in June by Las Vegas Justice of the Peace Deborah Lippis.

    She paid a $500 fine. But she was allowed to keep her license. Ostraat was 79 when she hit Emens, a 56-year-old pilot.

    Emens' son Nathan has been left inconsolable by the death of his father and what he perceives as a lack of justice.

    "We would have liked to have seen her do some community service and lose her license," he said. "We weren't going for jail time. She just pulled into him, and she showed absolutely no remorse."

    A year earlier, Douglas High School junior Bridget Chambers was killed in July 2005, as she was driving her car on U.S. Highway 395 south of Carson City.

    Minden resident Forrest Ladd, 79, turned his SUV into the path of Bridget's oncoming vehicle.

    Douglas County prosecutors decided they could not bring charges against Ladd because he suffered from progressive dementia and could not understand or remember what happened the day of the accident.

    Ladd surrendered his driver's license.

    The two cases illustrate a national problem of inattentive older drivers causing fatal accidents.

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found last year that drivers over age 74 are involved in six fatal crashes per 100 million miles driven, only slightly less than teenage drivers.

    The fatality rate for drivers 85 and older was nine times that of drivers 25 to 55.

    Only Illinois and New Hampshire require drivers to submit to mandatory road test examinations to keep their licenses after age 75.

    Texas approved a law in 2007 that requires people 79 and older to appear in person to renew their licenses and take a vision test. If the examiner notices they are shaking or having trouble answering questions, the applicant must take a driving test.

    The law was passed after a 90-year-old driver ran a red light and killed a teenager. In the first year after its passage, fatal accidents involving senior citizens dropped by 25 percent.

    In Nevada, one generally can secure a drivers license at age 16 and keep it without ever taking another road test.

    Applicants 70 and older who renew their licenses by mail must include a medical statement from a doctor. If they renew in person, that is not necessary.

    But Kevin Malone, a spokesman for the Department of Motor Vehicles, said DMV employees can require drivers of any age to submit to written or road tests if they suspect the driver has physical or mental problems.

    "It has to be an extreme case," added Malone, who concedes this additional check is rarely done.

    Of Nevada's nearly 1.7 million licensed drivers, 14 percent, or nearly 233,000, are age 65 and older. Nearly 14,000 are age 85 and older. The oldest licensed driver is 102.

    Clark County District Attorney Bruce Nelson said prosecutors originally charged Ostraat with misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter.

    Witnesses, however, failed to show up and the judge refused to allow any more delays, he said.

    The left turn violation and $500 fine was the best he could secure in a plea bargain with Ostraat's lawyer.

    Ostraat's lawyer refused repeated requests to talk about the crash.

    State Senate Transportation Chairman Dennis Nolan said the time has arrived to discuss what can be done to keep drivers off the road when they lack the faculties to continue driving.

    "We have to address it," said Nolan, R-Las Vegas. "We encourage and want seniors to lead independent lives, but we have to get them off the road (when they are dangerous to other drivers)."

    Nolan said his committee has a traffic safety bill that can be used to begin discussions on older drivers during the 2009 Legislature.

    AARP Nevada spokeswoman Deborah Moore said her organization opposes any special test or requirement on older drivers.

    "Some people in their 70s and 80s are incredibly smart and better drivers than those in their 40s," Moore said. "By and large, our older drivers are extremely careful. We don't agree with age-based licensing standards."

    In her view, it falls upon the families of older drivers to persuade them to give up their licenses when they no longer are capable of being good drivers.

    Moore acknowledges older drivers might not always agree with family members who want them to stop driving. AARP considers family persuasion the best approach.

    "We are asking the family to take away the car and keys when it is necessary," she said.

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 31 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Distressed wrote on October 08, 2008 02:10 PM: I am an insurance agent here in Las Vegas. I understand the need for anyone to drive here. The public transportation system is terrible, it is far too hot in the summer to walk, and too dangerous to bike. Who honestly wants to sit in the DMV for three hours to do anything, let alone renewing a drivers’ license anyway? The DMV system really needs a boost.

    Driving is a PRIVELAGE, not a right. I believe that EVERYONE regardless of age, race, or health should be required to take a drivers test in order to renew their licenses. If you are deemed incapable, you should be required to give up your license for a minimum of one year before being subject to another drivers test.

    I like Think's idea of using a driving simulator, not only testing night/day environments, but also situations that test reaction time and decision making skills.

    Just think about it. Maybe a little bit of hassle for everyone, but lives and limbs be would be saved. Another perk - EVERYONE'S auto insurance costs would go down…


    Report abuse

    Jim wrote on October 08, 2008 11:29 AM: I have been rearended 3 times by people in their 40s. The ones that scare me the most have a cell phone in one hand and a coffee cup in the other while they read the paper, eat breakfast, shave , apply make up, read a book and or yell at their kids that are not in car seats or seat belts.


    Report abuse

    George Maxwell wrote on October 07, 2008 07:51 AM: I am 62 and I fully agree with testing after a certain age but first I would ask that those with multiple dui's be removed from the roads.


    Report abuse

    Paul wrote on October 07, 2008 12:12 AM: Supposedly, driving is a privilege, not a right. And, I believe that the first priority should be on safety.

    Therefore, it is my opinion that the State should do whatever is necessary to assure that all drivers, including the elderly, are both mentally and physically able to drive safely.


    Report abuse

    Travesty wrote on October 07, 2008 12:08 AM: To Mr. Emens' son, Nathan, and to the other families who lost loved ones due to older drivers' negligence, I am so sorry for the loss of your loved ones.

    It is incomprehensible to me that the woman who killed Mr. Emens didn't even lose her license. She killed a man and only paid a $500 fine?? Despicable.


    Report abuse

    MM wrote on October 07, 2008 12:02 AM: Interesting, I was hit by an "older" driver today. Thankfully, it was not a severe crash and no one was injured, but it was clearly the "older" driver's fault and she claimed there wasn't even an accident (her paint was all over the side of my car)!

    I'm astounded that AARP spokesperson Moore would say "leave it up to families." How many older folks don't have families to intervene? There most definitely should be a driving test requirement for older drivers, and while it may be true that many drivers in their 70s and 80s are better drivers than their much younger counterparts, most younger people don't "shake" or have dementia, but do have much better reaction times.


    Report abuse

    mauna loa wrote on October 06, 2008 11:00 PM: If you look at the statistics from the police departments across the usa on accidents, seniors cause 10x more accidents than a teenager on a cell phone. However, the gutless,spineless, politicians are not going to bring that up. Suicide for him/her.
    It's a BIG problem, but no one knows how to handle it, and the way things are going now, the woman are driving into their late 80's. I read a story in the paper here that one of the family member stated "we don't let Grandma drive more than 5 miles from the house, and never on the freeway". (what the *****^^^^)


    Report abuse

    nvnospin wrote on October 06, 2008 10:41 PM: Common sense tells you some of these people are not capable of safetly operating a vehicle. I'm sure if you can't persuade them to give up their license a civil lawsuit will be more than adequate. Of course that won't bring back a loved one killed by their poor judgement.


    Report abuse

    Aroogance wrote on October 06, 2008 10:09 PM: I am surprised by the arrogance of some folks that are willing to trade someone elses life for their own independence and convenience. I commend the gentleman that was intelligent enough to realize that he may be incapable of operating a 5000 plus pound weapon and chose to err on the side of safety. I bet that if Deborah Moore lost a limb or a loved one to someone too old to operate a motor vehicle she would change her tune.


    Report abuse

    Mamamia wrote on October 06, 2008 08:28 PM: If any person over age 70 hasn't got the sense to realize they could pose a danger while driving, they are more dangerous for that kind of attitude. Everyone at any age can have an accident, but older people have to show they have the good sense to quit driving in these dangerous times we live in. Remember, it's up to us older people to look out for the world.


    Read All Comments