Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


FAMILY COURT: Judge's removal ordered

Panel rules after Del Vecchio admits sexual improprieties

RENO -- Clark County Family Court Judge Nicholas Del Vecchio was removed from office Tuesday by the Commission on Judicial Discipline after he admitted to numerous sexual improprieties, including having sex in hotels with a staff member during working hours.

The commission's decision, effective immediately, put the eight-year judge in the company of three other Southern Nevada jurists removed from the bench since 1987.


Most Popular Stories
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • The ruling also bars Del Vecchio from again seeking judicial office in Nevada.

    It came despite the pleas of his attorney Bob Dickerson for "some compassion," in light of a stroke suffered by the judge in 2005 and accompanying memory loss.

    But Mary Boetsch, special prosecutor for the commission, described Del Vecchio as a man with great sexual hunger.

    "He was constantly on the prowl," she said, adding that it was "abundantly clear he has no business being a judge."

    After the judgment was announced, Del Vecchio asked if he could continue to receive his salary and health care benefits until his term concludes at the end of the year.

    Del Vecchio said he needed to "deal with some health issues" before his insurance runs out.

    "Our order immediately removes you," said District Judge Richard Wagner of Lovelock, not answering Del Vecchio's question directly.

    Because of the "egregious nature" of the actions committed by Del Vecchio, Washoe County District Judge Jerry Polaha said, he was "no longer fit to serve as a judge."

    Both judges serve on the commission, although Wagner is a temporary member assigned to Del Vecchio's case.

    Polaha said Del Vecchio should contact David Sarnowski, the commission's executive director, and make arrangements for removing personal items from his courthouse office in Las Vegas.

    Del Vecchio earlier asked the commission to allow him to work until Dec. 10 so he could finish pending trials and use three weeks of comp time to secure treatment for medical problems.

    But he also had agreed to accept and not appeal the seven-member commission's judgment.

    Del Vecchio won't receive any further salary but is eligible for a portion of his judicial pension.

    Kateri Cavin, operations officer of the Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, said Del Vecchio also is eligible for COBRA, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, for 18 months.

    COBRA provides health care benefits for a limited time. He will be paying the full premium.

    Del Vecchio unsuccessfully attempted to win a judge's seat seven times before he was elected in 2000.

    Polaha noted that Clark County voters in the August primary election rejected Del Vecchio's bid for re-election. Candidates Vincent Ochoa and Cynthia Giuliani advanced to the general election for Family Court Department K.

    Del Vecchio, 51, apologized for 11 violations of the code of judicial conduct, but added he never before had been accused of any improprieties while sitting on the bench.

    He was accused in February of 38 judicial code violations in a complaint filed by Boetsch.

    The first set of allegations included sexual abuse of his 14-year-old stepdaughter in the 1990s. Del Vecchio vehemently denied that charge.

    On Friday, Boetsch released an amended 11-count formal statement of charges against Del Vecchio.

    The charges represented a negotiated settlement with Del Vecchio that would end the need for a weeklong hearing before the commission.

    None of the final charges included any mention of Del Vecchio having sex with a minor.

    But he did admit to having an ongoing sexual relationship with Rebeccah Murray, his former stepdaughter, after he hired her as his judicial executive assistant in May 2002. She was then 24.

    Del Vecchio said he would meet with Murray "at various hotels for sexual liaisons during working hours." She was paid her regular salary during those hotel visits.

    Del Vecchio also admitted he gave Murray thousands of dollars during the time he was having sex with her.

    He did not contest that after his sexual relationship with Murray ended, he no longer accommodated the flex schedule she had been given so she could attend the Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

    "This was a person I cared about," Del Vecchio told the commission. "I loved her. We bought property together."

    Other charges admitted by Del Vecchio included:

    • Calling his court bailiff Richard Tamez a "lazy Mexican" and referring to Mexicans as "wetbacks."

    • Discussing in graphic detail with others sexual acts between him and his ex-wife.

    • Staring at the breasts of a female court employee and mimicking the speech of an African-American employee.

    • Making sexually suggestive comments to Tamez about a female law clerk and telling him that a female judge "had a fine ass."

    • Telling Tamez how he found some female courthouse employees especially attractive and how lucky it would be to go home to them.

    Dickerson said most of the sexually suggestive comments made by Del Vecchio were said in the presence of Tamez, whom he considered a close friend.

    "It was like high school days, locker room talk," Dickerson said.

    Tamez and Murray quit working for Del Vecchio in May 2006.

    Del Vecchio said he spoke in Italian with Tamez when he made the sexual comments about women.

    Del Vecchio's lawyer, Bob Dickerson, said the commission should have "some compassion" for Del Vecchio, mentioning he had a stroke in 2005 and suffered some memory loss.

    Clark County's Chief Family Court Judge Art Ritchie said Tuesday that the court probably will assign Del Vecchio's cases to a senior judge or another Family Court judge.

    Ritchie said Del Vecchio is responsible for about 2,000 cases a year.

    "It's always difficult when a judge faces serious accusations," Ritchie said. "We'll handle it the best way we can to make sure court business continues."

    Del Vecchio only had about two months left to serve on his term. He didn't earn enough votes to advance to the general election.

    Marsha Kelley, 63, said she was overjoyed to hear that Del Vecchio was removed from the bench.

    Kelley had a contentious divorce case in front of Del Vecchio and she believes he was biased in favor of her ex-husband.

    She filed a complaint against Del Vecchio with authorities this year.

    "I believe he never should have been on the bench," she said.

    While removing judges from the bench is rare, the commission has done so.

    In 1987, it kicked District Judge Paul Goldman off the bench after it found him guilty of judicial misconduct.

    In 1995, the Judicial Discipline Commission ousted North Las Vegas Municipal Court Judge Gary Davis, who was accused of borrowing money from court employees and endorsing political candidates.

    The commission also removed Family Court Judge Fran Fine from the bench in 1998 for having ex-parte conversations, or conversations involving only one side of a case.

    Fine also was accused of appointing a cousin as a mediator without disclosing the relationship.

    The commission now has before it the misconduct case of suspended Clark County District Judge Elizabeth Halverson.

    Halverson is accused of improperly communicating with jurors, falling asleep on the bench and mistreating staff.

    The commission in August held a quasi-judicial disciplinary proceeding, conducted like a trial, to determine whether she will be removed from the bench.

    The commission, which has not issued a decision, could permanently bar Halverson from serving as a judge.

    Review-Journal reporter David Kihara contributed to this report. Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 43 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    jennifer wrote on December 08, 2008 09:55 AM: I am glad, this man gave my children to their dad - just because I was not in court to defend myself. why wasn't i there - because the kids dad never served me the papers to know to come!!!!! then we went to kent who screwed my family up even more when she refused a default, she always was mean in court even as i poured my heart out in tears. now my son is failing school because dad doesn't pay any attention to him and my daughter needs therapy because she always wants to be with me. thank God neither of these people will be on the bench anymore!!!


    Report abuse

    anonymous wrote on October 31, 2008 03:54 PM: He is getting what he deserves. And NO ONE knows the girl's life or what it was like to have to have him in it continually. Where was the Mother / ex-wife in all of this? Who protects the children?


    Report abuse

    Elliott is as bad wrote on October 24, 2008 11:42 AM: I agree with the problems most people had in front of Del Vecchio (unless you were lucky enough to hire the "right" attorney). In addition to everything in the JDC complaint against him and what is said here in the comments, he was very lazy as a judge and his rulings were all over the place. Very unpredictible. And he never allowed anyone to have a real trial so that decisions could be based upon admissible evidence. If he liked your attorney, you might have got a good decision from him. He never should have been elected.

    However, Jennifer Elliott is just as bad as Del Vecchio. She may not be as lazy, but she is clueless. Can't even do basic math, lacks common sense and lets cases drag on forever. She thinks she can just "encourage" (more like coerce) everyone to just share custody and get along. She ignores serious allegations of sexual abuse and mental illness and believes that the parents making the allegations are just engaging in "parental alienation." She refers families for services from her friends in the mental health field and then "rubber stamps" whatever her good friends recommend.

    We cannot let these incompetent people be re-elected and keep hurting families for another 6 years. We have thankfully got rid of Del Vecchio (but only because his sexual deviance and racial bias, not on the basis of his total incompetence), now we need to get rid of the others - ELLIOTT, MOSS AND KENT ALL NEED TO GO TOO - by exercising our right to vote for their opponents! We need to stop re-electing all these idiots and get some good judges on the Family Court bench.


    Report abuse

    Richard Ctreeter wrote on October 23, 2008 03:52 PM: it would appear that there are different standards of justice for JUDGES and "JUSTICE" for the general public.

    "He admitted to numerous sexual improprietiesThe first set of allegations included sexual abuse of his 14-year-old stepdaughter in the 1990s. Del Vecchio vehemently denied that charge.

    On Friday, Boetsch released an amended 11-count formal statement of charges against Del Vecchio."

    "None of the final charges included any mention of Del Vecchio having sex with a minor."

    Shouldn't sexual abuses against minors, "sexual abuse of his 14-year-old stepdaughter " be investigated and handled by the district Attorney? Do judicial commissions override the district attorney?

    DO WE HAVE TWO FORMS OF JUSTICE IN NEVADA?





    Report abuse

    Patrick wrote on October 23, 2008 08:10 AM: Judge D was very fair in my child custody/divorce case. To further prove my point my X is still pissed at our 50/50 arrangement.


    Report abuse

    SPACE wrote on October 23, 2008 05:55 AM: HE HIS GONNA NEED MORE THAN A PENSION AND HIS HEATH CARE BENNIFS.


    Report abuse

    John wrote on October 22, 2008 03:39 PM: Who would have sex with that fat tub of lard? Must be some dog on the staff.


    Report abuse

    sammy wrote on October 22, 2008 03:28 PM: Ok people...

    It's time everybody come forward...

    It seems that so many people have had major problems and issues will the new Mr. Delvecchio and not Judge Delvecchio...The problem is he never acted like a judge anyway so why did they call him that...

    Please to all you people that have had problems with this man, please e-mail me at cardinals1105@yahoo.com and lets pursue it further...

    You're right, he's out of office, and there's not much anybody can do. Lets not give up and I think if we get enough people together the committee and the chief Judge might finally listen and do something...

    We all deserve a fair and not bios of a hearing and a proper judgement according to the law, not according to the mood of a person...

    Please e-mail me and lets pursue thsi further...

    Thanks

    Sammy

    cardinals1105@yahoo.com


    Report abuse

    Brent Bucy wrote on October 22, 2008 12:07 PM: Wow, a corrupt judge go figue. Some of these people think they are above the law themselves.

    Maybe he can appeal and hire the "Heavyyy Hitter." He too seems like another credible,honest and staight forward "Lier" I Mean lawyer.

    Maybe Del-hikkio can run for Gov...


    Report abuse

    Joshua wrote on October 22, 2008 12:05 PM:
    Don't be surprised with this SOB, he isn't the only one so biased like hell.

    Moss in DEPT:I is close to this m***er f***er, she rules the same way or worse,and gets so upset if you contest any of her decisions.

    PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR CHERYL MOSS in the next elections. Make her pay for the abuse.
    THANKS.


    Read All Comments