Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

sponsored by
News


THREE GROUPS: Forecasts of voting lag, so far

Record turnout was seen for new voters, young, Hispanics







Analysts have predicted that new voters, young voters and Hispanic voters will turn out in record numbers in this election. But as Nevadans continue to flock to the polls, turnout among those three groups is lagging, at least in the early going.

While turnout statewide was nearly 25 percent through Sunday, it was just 20 percent among Hispanic voters, 14 percent among voters under 30 and 15 percent among those who didn't vote in the last three elections, according to an analysis of state early voting records through Sunday prepared by America Votes, an organization that works to mobilize voters.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: When live news shots turn bad
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back




  • The data provide a glimpse into the composition of the more than 300,000 Nevadans who had taken advantage of early voting over the first nine days of the 14-day period. The information comes from proprietary databases that political action groups purchase from commercial vendors, cross-referenced with the public data the state releases showing who has voted.

    Traditionally, older people, whites and people who vote consistently tend to turn out at the highest rates overall, said David Damore, a political scientist at UNLV. But this year, much has been made of the idea that the youth vote, the Hispanic vote and first-time voters would turn out at unprecedented rates, galvanized by a heightened political climate and the candidacy of Democratic nominee Barack Obama.

    "I would have expected those numbers to be a little higher," Damore said. "At the same time, the people who come out for early voting may tend to be the tried and true."

    The idea that the electorate will be radically reshaped this year remains an open question, he said, and it's possible the Obama campaign faces a challenge turning out the untested voters it's relying on to win.

    Recent polling shows Obama leading in the Silver State by varying margins. Democrats' hopes have been boosted by a tectonic shift in voter registration that has left them with more than 110,000 more registered voters than Republicans, but the GOP insists there's hope because the election will be decided by who votes and how.

    "What Republicans have been saying is that registration is only half the game, and they have the tried and true model to get people out," Damore said.

    U.S. Rep. Hilda Solis, D-Calif., was in Las Vegas on Tuesday working to rally Hispanic voters for Obama. She said she expects high Hispanic turnout this year.

    "Many of them are registering to vote for the first time; they may be immigrants, and many are not familiar with the process here," she said.

    An important part of the Obama campaign's outreach to Latinos is clarifying how voting works, she said: making sure they understand that filling out a registration form is not the same as casting a vote, that early votes count just like votes on Election Day, and that they cannot vote over the phone.

    Deceptive phone calls targeting Hispanic Obama supporters in Nevada have tried to trick them into "voting" by phone and not going to the polls.

    Early voting turnout continues to be high overall. Through the end of voting Monday, more than 334,000 voters had cast ballots statewide, including 242,000 in Clark County and 59,000 in Washoe County. Statewide turnout is up to 29 percent, according to the secretary of state's office.

    In the urban counties, Democrats continue to turn out at higher rates than Republicans. In Clark County, 54 percent of those who voted through Monday were Democrats, 29 percent Republicans. In Washoe County, 51 percent of voters through Monday were Democrats, while 33 percent were Republicans.

    Partisan statistics were not available for the 15 rural counties, home to less than 15 percent of the electorate, which tend to be heavily Republican.

    At a Las Vegas early voting site on Tuesday, the effects of high turnout were clearly visible. About 25 people waited in line to get into a trailer on the grounds of the Las Vegas Athletic Club near the intersection of Sahara Avenue and Decatur Boulevard.

    "I haven't voted since I was 18, but it's time to start making a difference," said Denise Farrell, a 42-year-old black woman with braided hair who had just gotten off her graveyard shift as a housekeeping manager at a Strip resort.

    She said she was voting for Obama because "he's focusing on the middle class, not so much the rich. They're already rich. They don't need help."

    Janet Soldan, a 56-year-old real estate agent who is white, said she's a registered Republican who has never voted Democratic before, but this year, "I just want change. I just don't feel we can take it any longer. It's time to try something new." She, too, said she voted for Obama.

    John Collopy also said he was voting for change, but in his case that meant McCain. The 50-year-old white man, a Las Vegas limo driver, said he considers himself a conservative Republican, "but I'm not a happy Republican. I think McCain's going to be President Bush all over again, and I'm not a fan of Bush."

    Collopy said he's concerned that the government spends too much money and doesn't pay any attention to the little guy. He was disgusted by the Wall Street bailout. But he said he figured McCain was the lesser of two evils.

    Three new polls released this week find Obama with a lead over Republican John McCain in Nevada. A Rasmussen Reports poll released Tuesday put Obama at 50 percent, McCain at 46 percent. The automated poll of 700 likely voters was conducted Monday and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

    A poll conducted by Boston's Suffolk University and also released Tuesday found a bigger lead for Obama: He had 50 percent of the vote to McCain's 40 percent. That poll of 450 likely voters was conducted Thursday through Monday and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 4.6 percent.

    A poll Zogby International released Monday put Obama at 48 percent and McCain at 44 percent.

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 135 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    j wrote on November 02, 2008 06:32 PM: gee I wonder if there will be riots when/if McCain wins.. Like those happy gleeful riots that occured in chicago when da bulls won or in La when rodney king wins?? Gee or maybe there will be riots if McCain loses, I'm sure .. scary


    Michael Ray Thompson wrote on November 02, 2008 03:30 PM: I use to work for Gallup Poll. It was very professional and extremely accurate. I'm not so sure about these polls that the RJ is using. I hope that they are wrong and that John McCain, an American hero beats Barack Obama, a one-term Senator.


    LindyH wrote on October 30, 2008 09:07 AM: I'm so confused this time around. What the heck is with the "early voting" stuff going on in our country. Isn't election day, exactly THAT, election day. I can see absentee ballots for those travelling legitimately, but perhaps you can enlighten us all about what has changed this time around. Is it all Acorn? Why are the rules changing? I really dislike this and how it's being publicized so much.


    David wrote on October 30, 2008 08:03 AM: From snopes.com If one votes straight Democrat or Republican BEFORE you have voted for president, your vote for president WILL NOT be counted. This is being circulating amoung Obama supporters and not to McCain supporters. www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/strightticket.asp


    RufusVonDufus wrote on October 30, 2008 04:55 AM: Vote Early; Vote Often! This is the battle cry of the Obama campaign headed by that bipartisan organization called Acorn. Why do you suppose so many homeless people in Ohio have registered a bench as their residence in all 88 Ohio counties. Voting early also made it possible for them to vote in all 88 counties. The only thing bipartisan about Acorn is that they don't care who you vote for as long as it is either Barack Hussein Obama or the black candidate, Barry Obama--you have a choice.

    MCCAIN/PALIN FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY


    john smith wrote on October 30, 2008 04:52 AM: Were the Hispanics legal?????? There seems to be a lot of them voting . when there are tons that are not legal surely those stayed home. If they did not stay home then there is a massive mis-vote in this election and the Obama may be a Bush like character; being a non-president or illegal president.


    Raiderdad wrote on October 30, 2008 04:49 AM: The most fearful thing about Obama is not his names, but what he has advocated regarding appointment of judges to the courts in our country. If you think the 9th Circus Court in CA is scary, wait until Obama starts appointing his "redistribution" judges.


    matt wrote on October 30, 2008 04:34 AM: How about voting against someone because you believe that, though it is flawed, capitalism is fundamentally more functional than socialism.
    (btw, fixed incomes can be attained through retirement accounts, not necessarily Social Security).


    Dave wrote on October 30, 2008 04:26 AM: One comment is spot on, "there are alot of uneducated people out there!" Well, many of us have seen this movie before...raise taxes in a recession, and a vote for change...like 1932...many people don't know the economy was actually worse after 6 years of FDR than it was after Hoover...and it was the regulation, new taxes, and bigger gov't...good thing the war came along to bail us out...maybe we see that again too. One thing for sure though...in times of higher tax burdens charitable giving goes down dramatically. Well, we've seen one hell of a stock bubble, then one hell of a housing bubble, so it only makes sense we see one hell of a bust. Unfortunately, that's not the "change" I was looking for.


    Gabe Shepherd wrote on October 29, 2008 11:13 PM: Lot of trolls on here tonight...

    All I know is the Democrats have out voted Republicans 2 to 1 so far so for all of you out there voting against someone because of their middle name better get to the polls...


    Read All Comments