Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Judicial contest still tight

Poll says Pickering edging Schumacher







CARSON CITY -- Las Vegas attorney Kris Pickering has pulled slightly ahead of her judicial rival in one Supreme Court race, while incumbent Chief Justice Mark Gibbons has opened up a wide lead over his opponent in the other high court contest in the November election, a Review-Journal poll shows.

In the Seat B contest, Pickering has the support of 33 percent of likely voters, while Washoe County Family Court Judge Deborah Schumacher has 30 percent. But a healthy 26 percent remain undecided, and 11 percent want neither candidate.


Most Popular Stories
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream




  • Gibbons, running for a second term on the court, has pulled far ahead of Las Vegas attorney Thomas Christensen and now leads 45 percent to 16 percent with 23 percent undecided. Sixteen percent support neither candidate.

    The statewide poll of 625 registered and likely voters conducted Tuesday and Wednesday by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, D.C., has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

    The poll results in the Pickering-Schumacher matchup are dramatically different from a similar Review-Journal poll conducted a few weeks ago. In that poll, Schumacher led Pickering 22 percent to 13 percent with 46 percent undecided.

    The Gibbons-Christensen poll results are different too as voters have made up their minds about who to vote for in Seat D. Gibbons in the earlier poll was leading Christensen 24 percent to 15 percent with 44 percent undecided.

    "Gibbons seems to be putting this one away," said Brad Coker, managing partner of the polling firm. "He was ahead before, but he has increased his margin."

    But in the other matchup for the seat being vacated by retiring Justice Bill Maupin, "Pickering has made it a horse race," he said. "Schumacher was up by nine points, and now Pickering is up by three points."

    The change has come after the disclosure that Pickering had contacted the FBI earlier this year and alleged that her former campaign manager Gary Gray said she would be given campaign contributions for agreeing to recuse herself from cases involving Las Vegas attorney Laura Fitzsimmons. Both Gray and Fitzsimmons have denied the allegations.

    Pickering is running television ads touting her support from the law enforcement community and highlighting the fact that she "stood up" to and "blew the whistle" on judicial corruption.

    Pickering could not say whether the incident is a factor for voters.

    "I am heartened by the numbers, but I'm still working hard and every vote counts,' she said. "It's a close race, and I think the poll reflects that."

    Ronni Council, campaign manager for Schumacher, said the numbers are positive for the judge, given the amount of television time bought by Pickering.

    "We went on TV quite late compared to Ms. Pickering," Council said. "She has been on since prior to the primaries. The fact that the numbers are within the margin of error are good for us."

    Schumacher is gearing up, both on television and in personal campaigning, she said.

    Gibbons, who is not related to Gov. Jim Gibbons, called the poll results very encouraging.

    "I'm just ecstatic about those results," he said. "I've jumped over 20 points in just a couple of weeks. It shows we're getting our message out and that my record as a justice is resonating with voters."

    Christensen said the results reflect that he has not spent any money on his campaign. Voters have responded favorably to his campaign, but it has been quite limited, he said.

    Christensen said that if he had money to spend on the race, it would be competitive because voters are not entirely happy with the performance of Gibbons or the court as a whole.

    Contact reporter Sean Whaley at swhaley@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3900.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 21 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Pickering stepped up wrote on October 31, 2008 05:48 PM: Schumacker's campaign has to be experiencing collateral damage from this incident, and it should. Fitzsimmons active support of Schumacker's campaign speaks for itself.

    I find it an interesting thought that Grey was in bed with whatever the outcome would have been by offering the $200,000 bribe to Pickering. Grey was the one who presented the conflict of interest. Like in the Godfather..."whoever delivers the deal is the traitor."

    Except, of course, Pickering firing him and turning the incident over to the FBI.




    There is more to the story wrote on October 31, 2008 01:43 PM: A snippet from Dana Gentry over at the Sun.

    And on the eve of Nevada Day, here's a trivia question: What's the connection between the Mosleys' tortured custody battle and the recent story on attorney Laura Fitzsimmons' alleged attempt through Gary Gray to gain state Supreme Court candidate Kris Pickering's promise to recuse on cases involving Fitzsimmons' firm, if she were elected?

    The answer tomorrow.

    http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/final-take/2008/oct/30/above-law/


    Dottie wrote on October 31, 2008 11:50 AM: Connect them here. A documented view of our judiciary.



    http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/final-take/2008/oct/30/above-law/


    Dottie wrote on October 31, 2008 11:50 AM: Connect them here. A documented view of our judiciary.

    http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/final-take/2008/oct/30/above-law/


    rose colored glasses wrote on October 31, 2008 11:16 AM: To Karen and John, The key word is "practice". Schumacher practiced......

    I practice the piano......

    With the Laura influence it is not worth the chance.


    Beware of appointed Judges wrote on October 31, 2008 11:11 AM: Voters should do their homework before voting for appointed judges.

    All an appointment says is; The appointing politician likes the person.

    The backdoor contract does exist. Are there others we do not know about?

    Wasn't Fitzsimmons the chief cheerleader for Nancy Saitta? That speaks volumes. Does Laura hand pick our judiciary?


    ML wrote on October 31, 2008 11:08 AM: TERM LIMITS!

    These judges need to be removed from the job. Vote them OUT!!!!!!!


    Karen Henke & John Hill wrote on October 31, 2008 11:00 AM: Two distinct paths to Nevada’s Supreme Court Bench

    In the race for Seat B, Kris Pickering faces Deborah Schumacher.

    Kris Pickering is a good attorney. She’s spent 28 years as a successful trial lawyer. She has limited experience arguing cases at the Supreme Court level but she’s made lots of money; enough to buy $375,000 of media time in Clark County alone. In 1997 the Supreme Court appointed her to be a “Settlement Judge” in its new Settlement Conference Program. Settlement Judges, by definition, are impartial mediators. They don’t actually decide the outcome of cases. In 11 years, she has only mediated 20 cases for the Supreme Court’s program. Now, even though she has never actually been a judge, she wants a seat on the highest court in Nevada.

    Deborah Schumacher practiced law for 14 years. Then, in 1997, Governor Miller appointed her to be a District Court Judge. She was elected in 1998 and re-elected in 2004 without opposition. In 11 years on the bench, while deciding over 20,000 cases, Judge Schumacher has demonstrated a remarkable ability to listen to opposing arguments and render objective opinions in accordance with existing law.

    We need Supreme Court Justices who have proven their ability to examine complex cases and render sound, impartial judgments. Judge Schumacher has the ability to do just that. We support her and urge others to do the same.

    Karen Henke & John Hill


    Pickering has ethics wrote on October 31, 2008 10:38 AM: To the dubious comment at 8:22 A.M. referring to the FBI investigation and the possibility Pickering fabricated the evidence is ludacris.

    The FBI isn't being lead around by a ring in it's nose for anyone. Where do people come up with such idiodic ideas?

    Pickering took a stand against a very manipulative attorney and ethically challenged campaign manager.

    Your very naive if you don't get the limb Pickering went out on, to reject, report and fire her campaign manager because of "the fix" that was offered to her by two politically and money oriented power brokers.

    Pickering's ethically sound.


    Just Watchin wrote on October 31, 2008 10:36 AM: If you did not see face to face with Jon Ralston last night catch the reruns on channel 19 a must see.

    Excellent Reporting! Mosley uses a horse crop to discipline a small child? Mosley uses his position as a judge for his personal gain and to harm others?

    Sitting Judge Donald Mosley asked an attorney to engage in a felonious act to benefit his fiance Tawanna Crabb which would ultimately benefit Judge Mosley? Judge Mosley had already made arrangements with another attorney that was ready and willing to participate in the cover up? Did he?

    I hope Dana follows up on the Bankruptcy of Tawanna Crabb and the other cases involving this group.

    A quick check of Blackstone shows attorney David Winterton as the attorney for Tawanna Crabb. Was Winterton the attorney that was going to doctor the work record for Tawanna?

    Also, one can not ignore Judge Jesse Walsh's participation in Tawanna's cases with Winterton as Tawanna's attorney.

    By the end of the show, I came to the conclusion, JUDGE DONALD MOSLEY HAS CAUGHT A SEVERE CASE OF THE CRABBS.

    Hopefully, Dana will find out if others have too.


    Read All Comments