Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


CHAMBER REPORT: State tax structure praised

Collections per capita rank ninth most stable, study says

CARSON CITY -- Despite Nevada's reliance on volatile sales and gaming taxes to fund much of its budget, the state's revenue structure is superior to those of many other states by at least one measure, a study sponsored by the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce has found.

The study, released Thursday, found that Nevada's tax system is the ninth most stable of all the states when looking at state tax collections per capita, adjusted for inflation.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat




  • It also found that Nevada ranked 27th nationally for state tax collections per $1,000 of personal income, and ranked 43rd nationally in state tax collections as a percentage of gross state product.

    Although these other types of analysis showed the state's revenue structure to be less stable than other states', "this system has generally worked well for Nevada in most years, providing the capacity for substantial growth, bolstering economic development and providing a comparably stable revenue stream," the study said.

    "The results of this analysis suggest that Nevada's state tax system does not sit at either end of the spectrum," the report said. "It is neither among the nation's most stable systems, nor is it among its most volatile."

    The issue of revenue stability has become even more pressing because of the current economic crisis. Lower than expected gaming and sales tax revenues have forced Gov. Jim Gibbons and the Legislature to cut spending and tap emergency funds totaling $1.2 billion so far. Officials learned this week that the budget will have to be trimmed by another $250 million.

    "Now is a good time to analyze our state budgeting process to see if it can be improved," said Hugh Anderson, chairman of the Chamber's Government Affairs Committee. "This analysis should include a look at the rainy day fund size and process.

    "We should also consider establishing a budget stabilization fund specifically dedicated to K-12 education," Anderson said. "By setting aside money in good years specifically for education, we protect our schools from having to endure draconian budget cuts during lean times, such as we are facing today."

    The study by Hobbs, Ong & Associates and Applied Analysis also found that the assumption that local government finances are more stable because of a reliance on property taxes as a major revenue source does not hold up under analysis.

    "Revenue sources are an important consideration; however, the idea that simply trading sales tax for property tax between the state and local level will somehow improve the state's lot lacks foundation."

    The complete report can be found on the Chamber's Web site at www.lvchamber.com.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Jim wrote on November 07, 2008 11:04 AM: I'm all for cutting taxes even the MBT. Per the Economic Forum, the MBT for FY 2009, both financial and non-financial, is expected to total $280,386,000.

    Of course this decrease in the revenue stream requires an equivalent off-set in expenditures. Does anybody have any specific recommendations to accomplish this, and if so please identify the specific line item numbers as found in the Nevada State budget FY 2007-2009.

    Thanks.


    Michael Green wrote on November 07, 2008 10:58 AM: Patrick, would you please tell me where I referred to corporate income taxes or suggested that property taxes alone should be the basis of our taxation? My point is that when you have essentially regressive taxes or those based on "luxury" items as the basis for your tax structure, there is a problem.


    Patrick wrote on November 07, 2008 09:39 AM: Yes Mike that is correct.

    The reason is because corporate income taxes are the most volitile tax of all.

    Nevada has property, sales, gaming taxes as well as a state payroll tax (which is a really bad one and should be repealed).

    Not one state has a system based on property taxes alone. Arizona has higher property taxes than Nevada, I believe, no gaming taxes, and it is in worse shape than Nevada.


    Michael Green wrote on November 07, 2008 08:18 AM: Let me get this straight. A revenue stream based primarily on gambling and tourism revenue and sales taxes is more STABLE than one based on property taxes?