YUCCA MOUNTAIN: Waste site critics see opening - News

PRINT THIS Popular

Nov. 10, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

YUCCA MOUNTAIN: Waste site critics see opening

Obama's victory might keep repository out of state

By STEVE TETREAULT
STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU

Yucca Mountain: Nuclear Waste in Nevada

Workers prepare to ride a shuttle in April 2006 into the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. Opponents of the waste site hope Barack Obama's presidential victory brings a slowdown to the project.
Photo by Gary Thompson.

WASHINGTON -- It probably won't happen overnight, but opponents of the Yucca Mountain repository express confidence that President-elect Barack Obama will make good on a campaign promise to steer nuclear waste away from Nevada.

What is unclear is how that might happen, or when. And before it does, proponents are expected to make an appeal to keep the project alive.

Most Popular Stories

Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer

FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade

NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges

Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty

NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch

DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family

Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss

NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat

Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop

Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty

Among Nevada elected leaders who oppose nuclear waste storage in the state, Rep. Shelley Berkley, for one, said she can be patient.

"After having spent 10 years fighting Yucca, I can wait three or four more months in order to get this right to make sure this issue gets done," Berkley said.

Obama's victory on Tuesday elected a president who took a position against the storage of highly radioactive nuclear waste at the Yucca site, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

All of the Democrats who ran for president opposed Yucca Mountain in a campaign in which Nevada was a key early caucus state, where Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has staked a career on opposing the nuclear waste site.

"After spending billions of dollars on the Yucca Mountain Project, there are still significant questions about whether nuclear waste can be safely stored there," Obama wrote in a May 2007 letter to the Review-Journal.

"I believe a better short-term solution is to store nuclear waste on-site at the reactors where it is produced, or at a designated facility in the state where it is produced, until we find a safe, long-term disposal solution that is based on sound science.

"In the meantime, I believe all spending on Yucca Mountain should be redirected to other uses, such as improving the safety and security of spent fuel at plant sites around the country and exploring other long-term disposal options," he wrote.

Obama repeated that point elsewhere, including in an Oct. 30, 2007, letter to Reid and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., that has been parsed by people looking for clues as to how he might address the issue as president.

"In short, the selection of Yucca Mountain has failed, the time for debate on the site is over and it is time to start exploring new alternatives for safe, long-term solutions based on sound science," Obama wrote to the senators.

At least two advisers on the Obama transition team share that view.

John Podesta, former chief of staff in the Clinton White House, was hired by Reid in 2002 to help lobby the Senate in advance of a major Yucca Mountain vote. Podesta now heads Obama's transition team.

Also, Obama's thinking has been reflected by Jason Grumet, his lead transition adviser on energy, who has been mentioned as a possible energy secretary in the new administration.

In a telephone talk with young nuclear professionals in September, Grumet said Obama also was concerned that Nevada "got squeezed" into taking the waste because at the time it did not have "a lot of clout."

Organizations that have supported continuation of the nuclear repository have dissected Obama's campaign statements and replayed his YouTube videos on the topic, looking for openings where they can make their case.

One view taking shape in that group is that if Obama is looking for certainty as to whether the Nevada site is suitable or not, he should let the Nuclear Regulatory Commission continue its review of the license application submitted by the Department of Energy in June.

"My recommendation is to continue the process so we can once and for all see if there is anything to these questions of technical suitability and safety of the repository. That seems like the way to go," said Brian O'Connell, nuclear waste adviser to the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, representing state public service boards.

Ward Sproat, the chief of DOE's Office of Civilian Waste Management, made a similar point at a panel discussion sponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies held two days after the election.

"We have a license application before the NRC," Sproat said. "Let's figure out what they are going to say and what the rationale is for their decision before we say we can't do it at Yucca and that we have to do something else."

Sproat said the NRC "is three or four years away" from a decision, although others expect it could take years longer to assess the first-of-its-kind effort.

A decision to stop or redirect the Yucca program could take one of several forms or a combination of them.

The most dramatic would have the energy secretary withdraw the license application.

Sproat said that could be done, but the result "would basically cast the whole process into a lot of confusion and uncertainty" because Congress set up the licensing process through law.

Berkley said it is more likely Congress would sort out Yucca Mountain in legislation, perhaps as part of an energy bill expected to be debated in the new year.

Like most everything dealing with Yucca Mountain in Congress, Reid holds a key to how Obama might move forward, observers said.

Obama would waver at the risk of inflaming the Senate leader.

"Were it any other time, and if Harry Reid was not there as majority leader, I would have written (Obama's campaign statements) off as rhetoric," said Bob Loux, the departing director of the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects.

"But since Reid is there and how strongly he feels about Yucca -- and any legislative agenda the president will want, will come through Reid -- he is in reasonably good shape to make sure Obama makes good."

In an interview on Nov. 1, after he met with Obama and introduced him at a rally in Henderson, Reid was asked about the project's fate in an Obama administration.

"Listen, Yucca Mountain's gone. Obama's president, Yucca Mountain's history," Reid said.

Since the election, Reid has been silent on the issue.

Review-Journal writer Molly Ball contributed to this report. Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

Share & Save

Leave Your Comment	25 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor. Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Please enter your name Name: Please enter your email Email: Please enter a comment COMMENTS : (word count limit is 300) You have reached the maximum number of words allowed Current Word Count: Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background. theroyprocess wrote on November 11, 2008 06:51 AM: Yucca Mt. proposed nuclear dump won't work. The DOE "knew or should have known" nothing will contain high level nuclear waste. It will continue to generate heat and already has leaked out of containment at Hanford, WA and other places. You can not change the laws of physics and pretend its OK. The apple always falls down and all the pay checks Yucca Mt. makes will not save your life! Mankind should not have spent trillions of dollars world wide on doomsday nuclear weapons. It took billions of years for nature to isolate natural radiation which allowed life to happen! The aim of nuclear power is to make the BIG STICK by adding neutons and producing atom bombs! The trick is to hide behind "national security" laws grab trillions of tax payer money to do it and make slaves of us all. You can photon transmute Plutonium 239 the element for atom bombs, to zero radioactivity and create electricity from the heat produced. But president Ronald Reagan signed the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act which limited science to "geologic isolation". Yucca Mt. was chosen for a dump site. davelv wrote on November 10, 2008 08:44 PM: If Obama overturns the NWPA, the next time the Democrats are not in power will there be Presidential national security ordered waste emplacement at Yucca Mountain? Democrats are playing a dangerous no win game for the whole country by trying to change 30 years of law just for political payback. This bodes poorly for the next four years of "cooperative" government between the two political parties. JD wrote on November 10, 2008 05:45 PM: Where are we going to put the waste and what are we going to do with this facility that has already been built.Your lying to yourselves if you think Obama is going to stop this, he wanted our votes.Plain and simple I Got a Solution wrote on November 10, 2008 05:15 PM: Can someone shove some of that nuke waste up Harry's & Shelley's (_!_) ? Pipe Dreamin' wrote on November 10, 2008 01:15 PM: Ha! Like already stated below, there's just way too much blegislation that needs to go away before this is a dead issue. I guess the next administration and several congressess can just do nothing about it like... -border security -social security -securing our vanishing liberties -challenging us as a nation to become better, insteAd of MORE dependent on sh*tty government programs -CHANGE!?! Blue1 wrote on November 10, 2008 12:59 PM: A few years ago Nevada had a budget surplus and I could have cared a less either way about Yucca Mountain. But now we're in debt up to our eyeballs and there's no hope on the horizon. I say open YUCCA MOUNTAIN, and lets reap the benefits. And with the profits we could also build our own nuclear power plant at the Test Site. Not only could we sell power to California, Utah and Arizona, but it could also serve as a back-up to Hoover Dam in case anything ever happened there. todd wrote on November 10, 2008 12:42 PM: Tom V, look at the waste that comes to this town, let alone the waste that lives in North Vegas. It's dark over there,, them people need to be stuck in Yucca Mountain, along with Obama. White Power Tom V. wrote on November 10, 2008 12:17 PM: This state is crazy, they can get paid for this. Folks if you knew what was already being transported in this state you would change your tune. everyday radioactive material travels through town. You wouldnt even know if you were next to it on the road. I say lets do it and get paid. Life will go on as normal. Las Vegas Native wrote on November 10, 2008 11:14 AM: "This is the best place for a Waste Dump". ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? How can you make that statement? You are only saying that because of what you have read from the Yucca Mountain people. Yucca Mountain came here originally because of the lack of Clout we USED to have in the government. Now that we have some influence in the Senate and House, we need to move it somewhere else. Trust me, more money has been wasted in other places ( See Haliburton in Iraq) I have an idea. A state with much much more isolated land that will never be seen by any actual people. Where there are no earthquakes or faults. A state like.. Texas! Thats it, Texas. A much better place for a nuclear Dump. ( See what political clout can get you?) 5150 dave wrote on November 10, 2008 10:49 AM: Thank You "Yucca Insider". There is nothing that is going to stop Yucca Mountain.. not even Obama. So. lets figure out how Nevada can earn from it.... as Yucca insider notes,"the host state can negotiate for benefits". So who is in charge of this... 59 degrees... it's getting warmer... nice Read All Comments