Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

sponsored by
News


ROAD WARRIOR: Same old rules keep truckers on road



Truck drivers better get used to driving longer hours.

And since Interstate 15 is the gateway for truck drivers between the shipping ports in California and much of the Northwest, valley drivers should know about the rules governing the truckers alongside them.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: When live news shots turn bad
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back




  • The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, or FMCSA, has finalized the regulation of how long the nation's approximate 3.5 million truck drivers can drive in a day.

    The new hours of service rule states truckers can drive up to 11 hours and work no more than 14 hours each day. (In case you're wondering, the extra three hours could be used to load and unload cargo.)

    The rule also requires truck drivers to spend at least 10 hours resting before getting back on the road. Drivers also cannot operate a truck if they have worked more than 60 hours in a given week.

    Also, drivers who are off the roads for at least 34 hours can reset their weekly work schedule, which by my count is a full 14 hours less than the 48 hours off that most full-time employees receive.

    The trucking industry has operated under those rules on an interim basis since 2004. Before that, truckers were not allowed to drive more than 10 hours and work 15 hours total in a day.

    Opponents, which include public safety advocates and unions, have criticized the FMCSA for kowtowing to corporate interests and making safety secondary.

    Joan Claybrook, president of the consumer and safety advocacy group Public Citizen, said the rule "will continue to force truck drivers to continue enduring sweatshoplike working conditions. This puts the health and safety of drivers at risk, along with the public who must share the road with tired truckers."

    But John Hill, head of the FMCSA, believes another hour of driving for truckers isn't a safety concern.

    He said it will lead to "more alert and efficient drivers, safer roads, and even fewer fatalities.

    "These rules are crafted to match what we know about drivers' circadian rhythms and the real world work environment truckers face every day," Hill added.

    Hill points to a reduction of large truck fatalities, from 5,240 in 2005 to 4,808 in 2007 as proof that the 11 hours of driving is safe.

    What Hill didn't point out was that when the rule was first put into place, large truck fatalities increased from about 5,000 in 2003 to nearly 5,200 in 2004 and again in 2005.

    Public Citizen, along with Parents Against Tired Truckers and Citizens for Reliable and Safe Highways, have twice challenged this rule in court.

    In 2004, a federal court said FMCSA had failed to consider the health of truck drivers when increasing the allowable driving time and it ordered the agency to revise its regulation.

    Still, the FMCSA reinstituted the same rules in 2005.

    Again, the federal agency was taken to court. The FMCSA was then ordered to better explain its justifications for adopting the new driving regulations. In the meantime, the regulations were kept in place.

    An appeal to invalidate the interim rule was denied, and now the FMCSA has made the regulation permanent.

    By finalizing the rule, the next administration will have a far more difficult time reversing it.

    The regulation will take effect on Jan. 19, a day before the new administration takes office.

    In the meantime, lets hope we don't see a whole bunch of yawning truckers on I-15.

    If you have a question, tip or tirade, call the Road Warrior at 387-2904, or e-mail him at roadwarrior@reviewjournal.com or fmccabe@reviewjournal.com. Please include your phone number.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 10 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    FMG wrote on December 07, 2008 10:55 PM: Is there any evidence that controlled stop lites,at 35/45 mph on streets such as Charleston or Rainbow would cut down on speeders and move traffic better. Also why not show auto accidents, Showing why and whom is at fault,the cost of the tickets and the court ruling.


    Joe Bama wrote on November 30, 2008 09:18 PM: california has lane restrictions on trucks and split speed limits. Have you been on I-15 lately? And use spell check dummy.


    7.62mm FMJ wrote on November 30, 2008 04:44 PM: TimeRanger:

    Hmmm-interesting, so it will hard to merge? that's your position huh?-doesn't seem to be in issue in other states. That's like saying all the bars will go broke if we ban smoking-so they must be allowed to poison the rest of us with second hand smoke so they can make a profit. Well, I don't see any for sale signs popping up on PT's, and I never see traffic backed up because of a correct and proper merge right law either.
    Good argument dummie......


    TimeRanger wrote on November 30, 2008 03:48 PM: 7.62 FMJ - Be realistic for a second or 2 - can you imagine trying to get on or off of I-15 if all the trucks were restricted to the right-hand-lane? You would rarely get on, then when you finally DID manage to enter the freeway, you might be stuck there - for miles past your intended exit ramp.

    "That way-we "non-commercial" drivers would not have speed up to get in front of you because you are going 20 miles under the limit,..." Gee, why not have a little patience and WAIT until you get to your exit. These drivers are "going 20 miles under the limit" because they don't want to end up in the back seat of fools like you.

    As for your other comments, I highly suggest that you spend a day in a Big-Rig before you spout your drivel. But then again, maybe YOU should be required to have mandatory physical exams and drug tests on a regular basis, just like the Professionals.


    ET wrote on November 30, 2008 03:30 PM: Lets face it we all hate trucks(not the drivers),however, we like the Goodies they bring.We hear a Semi truck = 8000 or more cars in damage to the road.


    7.62mm FMJ wrote on November 30, 2008 01:07 PM: And another thing:
    Before all the "poor me" I'm a trucker and pay a lot of taxes stuff starts-Listen closely- you pay a lot in taxes because your heavy trucks ruin the roads that we average taxpayers have already paid for. You are paying us back for destroying our roads.You think you should pay the same as me with my Ford Explorer? I don't think so!
    That's it that's all-now I'm going out on the 215 and will probably be cut off again by a "professional driver"


    7.62mm FMJ wrote on November 30, 2008 12:54 PM: Why don't all of you "driving professionals" lobby for forcing you to ALL stay in the far right lane, like most other states laws are? That way-we "non-commercial" drivers would not have speed up to get in front of you because you are going 20 miles under the limit,or watching all you "professional drivers" try to get in the fast lane then CUT OFF all of us, including us with "children in the back", when you need to get off on your exit. And I read talk about mind boggling? Are you kidding me? Why don't you people address the real problem, and we would never have to deal with you at all! Then you can continue to get all hyped up on your crystal meth and drive 20 hours a day-we wouldn't care less!


    TimeRanger wrote on November 30, 2008 12:21 PM: Gotta agree with Marc D on this one. And, just why is it that truckers are limited to "hours of service", but there are no regulations on cars, SUVs or motorhomes?

    Lets apply the "hours of service" to evrybody - Lets say that you work in an office or factory...you leave home at 7:AM. While at work, there is a problem that requires you to work until 9:PM. Now its time to go home, but you can't drive because you are "out of hours".


    Clay wrote on November 30, 2008 11:48 AM: You should also point out, since as I read it, your article sounds one-sided against the trucker driver, the fact is a in full 72% of the accidents on the road, where a tractor-trailer is involved, with a non-commercial vehicle, 100% percent of the time the fault, as determined by the POLICE REPORTS, is found to be the with the NON COMMERCIAL VEHICLE.

    And, don't go comparing our time off with that of "other full time employees". We aren't you. We don't want to be you. And, if we did, we'd choose a different profession.

    All that said, yes. Perhaps I am the "non-typical" trucking professional considering the massive pile of money I spent getting multiple higher education degrees from good schools. Sure, that by itself makes me a bit different, but the fact is, I do what I do because I like it, and I don't like people much..... especially the kind that sticks their nose into business that IS NOT their's in the first place.


    Marc D wrote on November 30, 2008 08:36 AM: wow,another uninformed column in the R-J.

    all you would have to do is spend one day in my dump truck riding around in this town to see what the real danger is out there.

    I see parents with children in the backseat do the stupidest things you can imagine so many times daily it boggles the mind yet you are worried about truckers running one more hour a day.

    if trucks were as dangerous to everyone as they get blamed for then the carnage would be shocking because when you have to deal with cars doing things like flying by you at 20 miles an hour over the speed limit then diving into your lane, slamming on the brakes and turning into a friggin Wal Mart because we see that silly crap multiple times daily and ppl do it with their kids in the darn car.

    the real safety problem on Las Vegas roads are ppl that drive like jerk offs,always in a big hurry that don't care what red light they run or who they cut off.

    the courts need to take away the licenses of ppl that get convicted of running more that two red lights for 6 months and get real with the rest of the penalties doled out for idiotic drivers,make taking stupid chances a serious crime, then ppl will be safe on the road.