JANE ANN MORRISON: Krolicki planted seed of doubt, but facts and figures speak for themselves - News

PRINT THIS Popular

Dec. 04, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

JANE ANN MORRISON: Krolicki planted seed of doubt, but facts and figures speak for themselves

JANE ANN MORRISON
MORE COLUMNS

If Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki hadn't launched his first-strike offensive, his indictment Wednesday would have been a huge surprise. But because he went public beforehand, insisting he was the victim of political shenanigans, the seed was planted that his indictment was nothing more than a political assault by Democratic Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto serving as the tool of U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Unfortunately for Republican Krolicki, the factual timeline doesn't support his assertion, no matter how forcefully he makes it.

Most Popular Stories

NORM: When live news shots turn bad

NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage

NORM: Lance Burton renews contract

Motorcyclist killed in collision with CAT bus

NORM: Details emerge in Jackson probe

NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area

Motorcyclist killed in crash with SUV at Durango and Sahara

OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING: Police account is disputed

NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act

Interstate 15 projects pile up

Krolicki launched his offensive Nov. 24, saying Reid was behind the indictment and noting that only a few days earlier he said he might challenge Reid in 2010. But an audit by the Legislature, which first raised questions about Krolicki's handling of the Nevada College Savings Program when he was state treasurer, is dated Dec. 31, 2006.

While recognizing Reid's prodigious skill for political gamesmanship, it's unbelievable that two years ago he was working non-partisan legislative auditors to issue a hard-hitting audit against a potential political rival so that an indictment would pop up in 2008.

Cortez Masto hasn't shown any evidence of partisan game-playing as attorney general. Some of her legal efforts have hurt Democratic interests, such as term-limiting Regent Thalia Dondero and investigating ACORN, the Democratic-leaning voter registration group. If she conducted her job wearing partisan blue glasses, we ought to have seen evidence before now.

Krolicki has done an excellent job of sowing doubts with any potential jury pool with his accusations. Instead of a headline "Krolicki to be indicted soon," the Las Vegas Review-Journal went with the banner "Krolicki blames Reid for inquiry." Score one for Krolicki.

The only real surprise in Wednesday's indictment was that his chief of staff, Kathy Besser, was indicted alongside him. She also was his chief of staff when he was treasurer.

The indictment charges Krolicki with misappropriation and falsification of accounts when he was in charge of the college savings program from its start in July 2001 until he left office Dec. 31, 2006. Besser is charged with being a principal to the crimes of misappropriation and falsification.

Basically, the indictment alleges the duo didn't turn over program earnings of "$250 or more" that should have gone to the state and kept false and fraudulent accounts of the program earnings and the marketing and administration funds. Half of the six charges deal with not turning the money over to the state, and half deal with the marketing and administration accounts. The indictment focuses on contracts with Upromise Inc., Upromise Investments Inc., Strong Capital Management Inc. and Strong Investment Inc.

The college savings program established in 2001 is a way for Nevadans to save money for higher education expenses through tax-free investment methods, commonly called 529 plans. At the end of 2006, the program had assets of $3.3 billion. It had earned $11.2 million. Krolicki gave $5.2 million to the state's general fund and held back $6 million to administer the program.

Don't worry that your child or grandchild's college fund is in danger. It's not. The audit was clear. "Although participant money in the Nevada College Savings Program was properly handled and accounted for, money earned by the state was not."

The audit, which Krolicki disputes, made it sound as if the treasurer were running the program as his own fiefdom, separate and apart from the state.

Some of the audit's concerns suggested the treasurer wasn't following the most basic accounting rules. He didn't provide annual financial statements. He didn't require much verification of expenses from contractors. He didn't follow Nevada law when contracting services. A law firm received almost $1 million, an overpayment of nearly $96,000, because it was paid $429 an hour rather than the $225 provided in the contract. And while the Legislature approved $1.6 million in expenses to run the program for five years, Krolicki spent more than $7 million -- overspending by more than $5 million.

Because he isn't accused of embezzlement, the question now is: What would his motive be for overspending?

When the grand jury transcripts become public, we'll see if any mention is made about all those televised promotional ads for the college savings program featuring Krolicki in 2006 -- when he was running for lieutenant governor.

Jane Ann Morrison's column appears Monday, Thursday and Saturday. E-mail her at Jane@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0275. She also blogs at lvrj.com/blogs/morrison/

Share & Save

Leave Your Comment	21 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor. Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Please enter your name Name: Please enter your email Email: Please enter a comment COMMENTS : (word count limit is 300) You have reached the maximum number of words allowed Current Word Count: Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background. Tit Tat wrote on December 04, 2008 07:13 PM: Jim, Governor not residing in Carson City is breaking the law and no one indicted him! Governor voting in Washoe County, when he's required by law to reside in carson City might be breaking the law...and yet, no indictment. Jim Nance wrote on December 04, 2008 04:06 PM: Giving yourself a 30% that is not authorized by the state is breaking the law. There is tons of evidence and a confession. Why has Loux not been indicted? 1. Democrat 2. Friend of Reid Arnold Sheffield wrote on December 04, 2008 03:52 PM: "Ou812" is also known as Jim Nance an attorney with an office in Green Valley....he loves Bob Beers; he's also known as "selective prosecutorial discretion". There are more charges that could be leveled at Krocliki, so don't think for a minute that they threw all the chickens in this one pot. As a personal injury attorney you must know how criminal cases are handled, right? Again, Counselor, have you reported the felonious activities that you throw on Kate Marshall to the AGs office yet? I mean come on, you have accused the sitting Nevada treasurer of committing multiple felonies in the performance of her office. A licensed attorney in Nevada wouldn't come on a blog like this and say such a thing unless he had proof! He could lose his license to practice law in the state! 0u812 wrote on December 04, 2008 02:09 PM: Let this play out in the courts and then and only then lets see what happens. If found not guilty, all dems in nevadead must move back too gayaforniacate. We know who you are because we just have too ask ACORN.. 0u812 wrote on December 04, 2008 02:08 PM: Let this play out in the courts and then and only then lets see what happens. If found not guilty, all dems in nevadead must move back too gayaforniacate. We know who you are because we just have too ask ACORN. Not Sheep wrote on December 04, 2008 01:51 PM: Attorney Jim Nance; You wrote earlier that kate Marshall has done the same thing that Krolciki was indicted on. Have you prepared your eveidence for the Attorney General? Are YOU totally corrupt? You would be if as an officer of the Court you did not report felonious activities that you are aware of! No, Nance is just another Beers follower who wouldn't say "boo" about any republicrat. Reagan's 11 commandment cut your honesty? Well as an officer of the court, I believe you have a duty...do you? Jim Nance wrote on December 04, 2008 12:59 PM: The only way to get Loux indicted for the King Reid to give the say-so. This state is totally corrupt. Johnathan L. Abbinett wrote on December 04, 2008 12:47 PM: Krolicki is using the same old, tired, lying, cheating, thieving, Republican tactics of: Deny, Diffuse, Re-Direct and Re-Frame to confuse and conflabulate the facts, in a pre-emptive strike to baffle everyone with more bull than they can stomach! It won't work - reasonable people will wait to see the facts, and get the truth and full truth! Then justice will be served! leslie wrote on December 04, 2008 10:54 AM: selective prosecutorial discretion, aka jim nance the republican; Please, file the ethics complaint. Do a citizen's arrest. OR, what if they are going to indict him and it takes two years to do so (like it took for Krolicki)? I assume that if each of the 4 counts against Krolicki are returned true, you will still support him to be an elected public official? Nope....good judgement not involved on who republicans support in Nevada. Jim Nance wrote on December 04, 2008 10:29 AM: Bob Loux, a big time Democrat, gave himself an illegal 30% raise.....not indicted. Nope....politics not involved on who gets indicated in Nevada. Read All Comments