Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


O.J. Simpson sentencing in Las Vegas
















Slideshow
For more than 13 years, he has been widely regarded as the man who got away with murder.

But this morning, O.J. Simpson was punished for other crimes: last year’s kidnapping and armed robbery of two sports memorabilia dealers at Palace Station.


Most Popular Stories
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested




  • After hearing a statement of remorse from Simpson, whose voice quavered as he spoke, District Judge Jackie Glass imposed a sentence that will keep the former football star behind bars between nine and 33 years.

    “I’m not here to try and cause any retribution or any payback for anything else,” the judge told the packed courtroom before announcing her decision. “I want that to be perfectly clear to everyone.”

    Simpson, 61, and co-defendant Clarence “C.J.” Stewart, 54, were convicted in October of all counts in the robbery case. Immediately after the verdicts were read, Simpson and Stewart were handcuffed and taken into custody to await today’s hearing.

    Glass sentenced Stewart this morning to between 7 1/2 and 27 years.

    Simpson, who plans to appeal his convictions, surprised the judge and other onlookers by making a statement at his sentencing hearing.

    He said he made the trip to Las Vegas last year to attend a wedding — not to reclaim property. But his plans changed when he learned the dealers possessed family heirlooms that he had unsuccessfully tried to recover in the past. “This was the first time I had an opportunity to catch the guys red-handed who had been stealing from my family,” he said.

    Simpson apologized, saying he did not know his actions amounted to crimes. He also said he asked Stewart to come along and help him.

    Glass said overwhelming evidence at the trial assured her that Simpson knew what he was doing when he entered the small hotel room where the robbery occurred. The trial also showed her that Simpson is both arrogant and ignorant, she said. “It was clear to the court that you believed you could do in Las Vegas what you couldn’t do elsewhere — you could get your stuff back,” the judge said, adding that the ownership of the items remains in question.

    Glass noted that the incident, which involved the use of at least one gun, was captured on audio tape.

    “That was actually a very violent event,” she said.

    During the trial, jurors heard hours of secret audio recordings that were made before, during and after the Sept. 13, 2007, incident.

    “Everything in this case was on tape,” Glass said.

    She said judges rarely have such “overwhelming” evidence before them when imposing a sentence.

    The Nevada Division of Parole and Probation had recommended a minimum sentence of 18 years for Simpson, who was acquitted of murder in 1995 in the Los Angeles slayings of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman.

    Simpson was found liable for the killings in a civil case and later wrote a book titled “If I Did It.” Members of the Goldman family were present in Glass’ courtroom this morning.

    On Oct. 3, exactly 13 years after the acquittal, a Las Vegas jury convicted Simpson and Stewart of robbing Alfred Beardsley and Bruce Fromong in a Palace Station hotel room.

    In court this morning, defense attorney Yale Galanter said Simpson’s acts “were beyond stupid.” But, he added, “Stupidity is not criminality.”

    The lawyer said Simpson’s behavior did not spring from an evil mind, and he had no intent to injury anyone. Galanter said even Simpson’s strongest detractors would have to agree that the case presented some “highly unusual circumstances.”

    Most of the property taken during the incident had Simpson’s name on it, the lawyer said, and Simpson acted without stealth.

    Galanter asked Glass to impose the minimum penalty, which would have given Simpson a chance at parole after six years. “He didn’t go into a bank and rob somebody,” the lawyer said.

    Stewart read a prepared statement at the hearing. He apologized and asked for the judge’s mercy.

    The defendant said he has successfully raised four children and has no prior criminal convictions.

    His attorney, Charles Jones, described Stewart as a good man who merely intended to help a friend.

    “He is a person who likes to try to help people if he can,” Jones said.

    The lawyer also said Stewart was unarmed and had “minimal participation” in the incident.

    Fromong watched the sentencing hearing on a news crew’s television outside the Regional Justice Center. He said the sentences imposed on both defendants were fair.

    “I hope people don’t consider this retribution for 1995,” he said, echoing the judge’s words. “This had to do with what happened in 2007.”

    Fromong said he had no opinion about what penalty Simpson deserved.

    “I wasn’t here to judge O.J.,” he said. “I was here to tell the truth.”

    He said he chatted with Simpson for about 10 minutes after testifying at the trial. The pair then shook hands and parted ways.

    “I have no bad feelings toward O.J.,” Fromong said.

    During the 3 1/2-week trial, Simpson’s lawyers portrayed him as a man who simply sought to recover game-used footballs, plaques and other cherished family heirlooms that had been stolen from him a decade ago.

    Prosecutors, on the other hand, painted a picture of a ringleader who orchestrated the armed stickup to exact revenge against his estranged former agent and the man Simpson believed had stolen his property.

     

    Contact reporter Carri Geer Thevenot at cgeer@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-8135.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 456 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Gregor wrote on December 29, 2008 11:15 AM: We now have a whole new meaning to
    "all alone in the end zone". And he's soon to loose his tight end statis.


    Report abuse

    Rachel Ashburton wrote on December 28, 2008 04:46 AM: The O.J. Simpson saga began with football notoriety and having been one of the first African Americans to appear in TV commercials. It's incredible that Blacks' reverse racism defended him in in the first case just because his wife was white; with no more information than the media provided. Ridiculous comments included "I don't think he did it but he knows who did" and "How could one man kill two people". O.J. told the judge in the second case, he didn't know what he did was wrong that he came to Nevada to attend a wedding. O.J. is one of the most notorious cases of narcissim - no regard for the lives, safety and rights of others. In both instances, O.J. demonstrated an inability to care or determine reality, even to the extent of portraying a lack of self-survival. "What do you mean that you didn't think it was wrong to confront people with a weapon making demands and forcing them to remain against their will. You would have attained more respectful attention seeking police assistance and use your high priced attorneys to retrieve your property." Undoubtedly, cases like this sheds light to some whites as to intellectual inferiority of blacks. Here's a man who could have done some much good in the world beyond football; who'd been raved and proclaimed as one of the most gifted athletes in the world. In the end, he's shuttered by his own inner demons. As an African-American, the history of racism in this country does not dismiss O.J. Simpson's illegal actions, including taking a life, if he did it," or threatening other human beings. May God continue to bless us all i this world and the next.


    Report abuse

    Private wrote on December 09, 2008 08:29 AM: I honestly dont care what color OJ Simpson is. He got what he deserved and is finally behind bars. If he knew that the guys that stoled his personal belongings were in that hotel than he should have gone to the police instead of committing a crime... If you think he was placed in prison due to being black than your wrong. Ever since the presidential elections we have been hearing nothing but racist comments and it is getting old.


    Report abuse

    Michael Ray Thompson wrote on December 08, 2008 07:25 PM: Wow, what do you know? O.J. is finally going to jail. He couldn't buy his way out of this one!


    Report abuse

    Tom wrote on December 07, 2008 10:23 AM: Gerry said, "I am caucasian!" What's the exclamation about? Could it be the revelation of a lie?

    Gerry said, "HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY!!!!" (in wife and friend slaying).

    Then Gerry said about this trial, "Why can people be so ignorant that since OJ is black, that he must be guilty??"

    Gerry, so when OJ was found not guilty, it was okay. But when OJ was found guilty, then it's because he was black?

    Then Gerry said, " I still cannot believe that Goldman was able to win in the civil trial". Gerry, to use your own words, OJ WAS FOUND GUILTY!

    Gerry picked and chose what he wanted to believe. When the verdict was what he liked, then "HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY!!!", like we should regard the jurors to have the unquestionable wisdom. But now this jury found OJ guilty, suddenly Gerry did not give such deference any more. What a contradition to the deference he gave to the first jury? Why? You read and read again, the only reasoning he had quoted was race - he is Caucasian and OJ is black.

    Gerry, I am afraid people are tired of race card being played. There is this thing called law and precedence. According to the precedences, OJ's sentence is on the light side.

    I urge Judge Jacky Glass, based on OJ's argument that he had no idea he broke the law, to conclude that this man has proven that he thinks he is above the law. While others can NOT storm other people's hotel room with a group of accomplices, and some carried a gun, then hold people hostage, OJ didn't think this was illegal for him to do. Wonder what gave him the idea. This is aggrevated crime. Such arrogant criminal deserves more punishment in sentencing, not less.


    Report abuse

    Rick in Ohio wrote on December 07, 2008 07:28 AM: If it don't fit.....

    Bubba will make it fit....


    Report abuse

    Mary wrote on December 07, 2008 02:26 AM: OJ got what any NORMAL non-celebrity would have got. Celebrities should not be sentenced any differently than regular people. I don't know who in the heck thinks that "anyone else would have got probation"...you DON'T GET probation for pulling a gun on someone and kidnapping, which is what you are doing when you refuse to allow someone to leave. As the judge said, we have courts to "get stuff back" you cannot resort to self-help measures.


    Report abuse

    Tammy B. wrote on December 07, 2008 12:35 AM: Earlier I wrote:

    "I believe it is to gain the judge publicity"

    Since then I've had opportunity to read some of the evidence and it's clear that O.J. should serve hard time for his crime. I am sorry I made such a stupid statement to start with.


    Report abuse

    Tammy B. wrote on December 06, 2008 09:46 PM: Let me make it clear that I am no fan of O.J.....he should have been found guilty the last go around. This time...to me it is BS....and I believe it is to gain the judge publicity. Anyone else would have received a lesser sentence...likely probation.


    Report abuse

    Lare wrote on December 06, 2008 07:07 PM: It is not Charles Darwin's book that caused the Black Reputation. It is the actions of some of the Blacks that dragged down the larger hard working Black community. Just as the gangs of the Asian community dragging down the hard working and family respecting reputation of the Asian Community.


    Read All Comments