Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Nevadans criticize plan to ship waste

Yucca draft lacks details, officials say

The Department of Energy's plan for hauling nuclear waste across the nation to a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain is a brush job at best, Nevada officials who are reviewing the document said this week.

"It's really a sad indictment of what little has been accomplished. There was more in the previous draft plan," said Robert Halstead, transportation adviser for the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects.


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • Halstead and other experts met Wednesday with the agency's new chief to discuss how state officials intend to express their concerns about the plan for transporting 77,000 tons of potentially deadly, spent nuclear fuel and highly radioactive waste to entomb it in the volcanic rock ridge, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

    Bruce Breslow, who replaced Bob Loux this month as the agency's executive director, said the plan is "ripe for us to respond to because it lacks so much specificity."

    "There's obviously many, many points that we're going to make comments on that are not detailed here," Breslow said Tuesday in a telephone interview from Carson City.

    But a spokesman for DOE's Yucca Mountain Project said the department welcomes those comments and others from the public to help shape the final "National Transportation Plan" into a more detailed document.

    "Those are exactly the type of comments we're asking for. The program looks forward to receive those comments, and we'll deal with it," Allen Benson, a DOE spokesman in Las Vegas, said Wednesday.

    Halstead said he is concerned about the lack of discussion of the dangerous radioactive nature of spent nuclear fuel and the lack of a requirement that dedicated trains be required for all shipments. "And DOE persists in claiming that rail shipments by general freight are safe," he wrote in an e-mail after the plan was released last week.

    The most recent map of "representative rail and truck routes" shows routes from the Pacific Northwest and from Kansas City that would maximize shipments through Las Vegas, Halstead said.

    "With the outgoing administration, they wanted to check off things, and they left out some of the controversial things, like cost," he said.

    He said the cost of shipping nuclear waste and spent fuel assemblies in what are called "transportation, aging and disposal" canisters probably will be between $10 billion and $20 billion, including some $3 billion to build a rail line from Caliente to Yucca Mountain.

    Benson, asked why the plan does not include designated routes, said that shipping will not start until about 2020, and if nuclear regulators grant a license and if construction of the repository is completed, identifying any specific routes would be premature.

    "Routing is something we would want to work with the public on," Benson said.

    Contact reporter Keith Rogers at krogers@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0308.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 8 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Bob wrote on January 22, 2009 01:15 PM: Fyi Ugly, the rail line is nothing new. It has always been planned.


    Transportation Solved by Clinton wrote on January 22, 2009 12:58 PM: Robert Halstead said he is concerned about the lack of discussion of the dangerous radioactive nature of spent nuclear fuel and the lack of a requirement that dedicated trains be required for all shipments.

    The point was made in the R-J on 1-17-2008, that Bill Clinton and Bill Richardson held 21 formal draft EIS hearings (9 in Nevada) in 1999 and 2000, to establish that danger from transportation of nuclear waste is less then such hazardous materials as chorine and propane. This has been a long closed issue, but still raised by Nevada even though they will not do anything about chlorine tankers running by the Vegas Strip. Bill Richardson was engaged in preparing a positive the Site Recommendation right before he left office.

    Transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) is not a problem. If Nevada representatives would demand similar protection for Chlorine tankers as will be in place for SNF such as dedicate trains, exclusion zones, evacuation plans, GPS locators, armed guards (to protect from terrorist with TOW missiles), track and signal inspects, alerts to local officials of the location of hazardous materials, trained emergency responders then we could be less concerned about the potential Bhopal like deaths from a toxic laden tankers of 90,000 people.


    Sudden Concern about cost wrote on January 22, 2009 12:56 PM: "With the outgoing administration, they wanted to check off things, and they left out some of the controversial things, like cost," he said.

    Robert Halstead said "the cost of shipping nuclear waste and spent fuel assemblies in what are called "transportation, aging and disposal" canisters probably will be between $10 billion and $20 billion, including some $3 billion to build a rail line from Caliente to Yucca Mountain.

    Last I looked the cask as paid by the nuclear power electric rate payers. Why does he care?

    The cask and shipping cost is in the is in the total project budget. I bet that is where he got his number - so what is the question Robert Halstead

    By slow walking the project Harry Reid does not care about cost why does Robert Halstead.


    It a Draft Bruce wrote on January 22, 2009 12:49 PM: Former Sparks mayor and television sports Bruce Breslow, who replaced confessed crook and lobbyist Bob Loux this month as the agency's executive director, said the plan is "ripe for us to respond to because it lacks so much specificity."

    What about draft did Bruce Breslow not understand.Comments on the draft to help shape the final "National Transportation Plan" into a more detailed document answering the questions that the public has.


    Ugly American wrote on January 22, 2009 12:03 PM: I'm glad their finally talking about a rail line instead of driving it on the roads. But Yucca is still not optimal. It has water running though it and it's near a dormant volcano that has had multiple earthquakes in just the past year.

    What the US needs is spent fuel reprocessing (like France) & breeder reactors (like Japan) closer to where the power is consumed. The vast majority of reactors in the US are east of the Mississippi and it would make more sense to minimize the transportation.


    letsciencedecide wrote on January 22, 2009 10:19 AM: Contentions, you should not be surprised. The anti’s (which includes the Nevada press) don’t want the general public to see them. Nevada got spanked badly for failing to comply with the legal requirements, lack of technical experts, and overall lack of viable contentions. DOE’s clearly paved the way for the NRC to throw out the entirety of Nevada’s fake science. The incompetence continues. The state has no scientific argument to stand on so they must rely on politics.

    I hope Obama waits to hear technical arguments before he acts on Harry’s behalf.


    letsciencedecide wrote on January 22, 2009 07:41 AM: Interesting headline???

    Nevadans Criticize???

    Halstead lives in Wisconsin. So in reality the headline should be: "Nevadan criticizes".

    Bruce is living up to the reason he was picked, he can give a professional "sound bite".


    Contentions wrote on January 22, 2009 06:22 AM: Though not directly related to this Yucca transportation story, I did notice that the DOE has already responded to those thousand plus pages of Contentions that the State and Counties submitted last month. They are at:

    http://www.state.nv.us/nucwaste/licensing.htm

    I am somewhat surprised that there has been little, if any press on this.